The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive and Negative Affective States in a Performance-Related Setting: Testing the Factorial Structure of the PANAS Across Two Samples of French-Canadian Participants
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to compare alternative factorial structures of the French-Canadian version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988 ) across samples of athletes at different stages of a sport competition. The first sample (N = 305) was used to assess, compare, and improve the measurement model of the PANAS. The second sample (N = 217) was used to cross-validate the model that provided the best fit with the calibration sample. Results of confirmatory factor analyses suggested that a modified three-factor model with cross-loadings provided a better fit to the data than either the hypothesized or the modified two-factor models. This model was partially replicated on the second sample. Results of a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis have shown that the model was partially invariant across the two samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456 · Cited by 4,115
Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/0144665031752934 · Cited by 2,957
Cited by
Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930903274322 · Cited by 875
Self-citationMeasurement invariance: Review of practice and implications
Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003 · Cited by 759
Berthelot, N., Lemieux, R., Garon‐Bissonnette, J., Drouin‐Maziade, C., Martel, É., & Maziade, M. (2020) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.13925 · Cited by 452
What is psychological well-being, really? a grassroots approach from the organizational sciences.
Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2012) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3 · Cited by 305
Díaz-García, A., González-Robles, A., Mor, S., Mira, A., Quero, S., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-2472-1 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J.-P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 240-249
- ISSN
- 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2426
- OpenAlex
- W1902414122
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive and Negative Affective States in a Performance-Related Setting: Testing the Factorial Structure of the PANAS Across Two Samples of French-Canadian Participants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240
- The paper
- Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J.-P. (2006). Positive and Negative Affective States in a Performance-Related Setting: Testing the Factorial Structure of the PANAS Across Two Samples of French-Canadian Participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.4.240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
