The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810031002 · Cited by 7,997
Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209528 · Cited by 4,750
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
Meredith, W. (1993) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294825 · Cited by 4,536
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00098-3 · Cited by 2,975
Chan, D. K. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.234 · Cited by 2,972
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
Differential Item Functioning.
Gudgeon, A. C., Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348590 · Cited by 2,091
Cited by
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 4,369
“Schmitt and Kuljanin (2008) identified 75 articles about measurement invariance over a 8-year period from 2000-2007 (9.38 articles per year), and Johnson et al. (2009) reviewed a 3-year period from 2005-2007 and uncovered 153 articles on measurement invariance (51 articles per year).”
BackgroundInfluentialHaar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010 · Cited by 965
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164413498257 · Cited by 767
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., et al. (2013) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus027 · Cited by 587
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085146169
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003
- The paper
- Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
