CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Mental Health Research TopicsMental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambulatory Assessment: An Innovative and Promising Approach for Clinical Psychology

Ebner-Priemer, Ulrich W., Trull, Timothy J.·2009·European Psychologist
DOI 10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.109
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Convergent experimental data, autobiographical studies, and investigations on daily life have all demonstrated that gathering information retrospectively is a highly dubious methodology. Retrospection is subject to multiple systematic distortions (i.e., affective valence effect, mood congruent memory effect, duration neglect; peak end rule) as it is based on (often biased) storage and recollection of memories of the original experience or the behavior that are of interest. The method of choice to circumvent these biases is the use of electronic diaries to collect self-reported symptoms, behaviors, or physiological processes in real time. Different terms have been used for this kind of methodology: ambulatory assessment, ecological momentary assessment, experience sampling method, and real-time data capture. Even though the terms differ, they have in common the use of computer-assisted methodology to assess self-reported symptoms, behaviors, or physiological processes, while the participant undergoes normal daily activities. In this review we discuss the main features and advantages of ambulatory assessment regarding clinical psychology and psychiatry: (a) the use of realtime assessment to circumvent biased recollection, (b) assessment in real life to enhance generalizability, (c) repeated assessment to investigate within person processes, (d) multimodal assessment, including psychological, physiological and behavioral data, (e) the opportunity to assess and investigate context-specific relationships, and (f) the possibility of giving feedback in real time. Using prototypic examples from the literature of clinical psychology and psychiatry, we demonstrate that ambulatory assessment can answer specific research questions better than laboratory or questionnaire studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.109

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Albrecht V., 2003, Das Erleben von Spannung – eine kontrollierte Studie
  2. Fahrenberg J., 1996, Ambulatory assessment. Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies, 3
  3. Goodman W.K., 1989, I. Development, and reliability
  4. Loranger A.W., 1999, International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE): DSM-IV and ICD-10 modules
  5. Rachman S., 1974, Synchrony and desynchrony in fear and avoidance. Behavior Research and Therapy, 12, 311
  6. Solzbacher S., 2007, Frontiers in stepped eCare – eHealth methods in behavioral and psychosomatic medicine, 111
  7. Wilhelm P., 2001, Progress in ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies, 173
  8. Wilhelm F.H., 2001, Progress in ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies, 313
  9. World Health Organization, 1992, The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Karlsruhe, Germany
  • University of Missouri (US)
ORCID
Trull, Timothy J.
Venue
European Psychologist
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing Group
Published
2009-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
109-119
ISSN
  • 1016-9040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-531X
DOI
10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.109
OpenAlex
W1994645569
Cited by
173
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
ambulatory assessment, ecological momentary assessment, real-time data acquisition, memory distortion, mood-congruent memory, peak-end rule, within-person processes, multimodal assessment, real-time feedback, clinical psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review