Cited by 30Cancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Psychological Adjustment of Melanoma Survivors: The Contribution of Hardiness, Attachment, and Cognitive Appraisal

Hamama-Raz, Y., Solomon, Z.·2006·Journal of Individual Differences

Abstract

The study examines the contributions of hardiness, attachment style, and cognitive appraisal to the psychological adjustment of 300 survivors of malignant melanoma: The findings show that the survivors' adjustment is by far better predicted by their personal resources and cognitive appraisal than by their sociodemographic features (with the exception of marital status) and features of their illness. Of all the variables, their adjustment was best predicted by their attachment style, with secure attachment making for greater well-being and less distress. These findings add to the ample evidence that personal resources help persons to cope with stressful or traumatic events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1614-0001.27.3.172

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamama-Raz, Y., & Solomon, Z.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social Work, College of Judea and Samaria, Ariel, Israel
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Individual Differences
Published
2006-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
172-182
ISSN
  • 1614-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2299
OpenAlex
W2139111924
Cited by
30
References
69
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
melanoma survivors, psychological adjustment, hardiness, attachment styles, secure attachment, cognitive appraisal, personal resources, coping, well-being, distress, marital status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review