Cited by 376Cancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Meaning making and psychological adjustment following cancer: The mediating roles of growth, life meaning, and restored just-world beliefs.

Park, Crystal L., Edmondson, Donald, Fenster, Juliane R., Blank, Thomas O.·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Cancer survivors' efforts at meaning making may influence the extent to which they successfully make meaning from their experience (i.e., experience posttraumatic growth, find life meaningful, and restore beliefs in a just world), which may, in turn, influence their psychological adjustment. Previous research regarding both meaning making processes and meanings made as determinants of adjustment has shown inconsistent effects, partly because of the lack of clearly articulated theoretical frameworks and problematic research strategies. In a 1-year longitudinal study, the authors distinguished the meaning making process from the outcomes of that process (meanings made), employing specific measures of both. The authors tested pathways through which meaning making efforts led to 3 different meanings made (growth, life meaning, and restored just-world belief) in a sample of 172 young to middle-age adult cancer survivors, and they explored whether those meanings made mediated the effect of meaning making efforts on psychological adjustment. Cross-sectional and longitudinal path models of the meaning making process indicate that meaning making efforts are related to better adjustment through the successful creation of adaptive meanings made from the cancer experience. The authors conclude with clinical implications and suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013348

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, C. L., Edmondson, D., Fenster, J. R., & Blank, T. O.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008-10
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
863-875
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2075953856
Cited by
376
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lance Armstrong Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
meaning-making, cancer survivors, psychological adjustment, posttraumatic growth, meaning of life, belief in a just world, mediation, cancer experience
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Culture, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sick Role, Survival, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review