Cited by 231Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Support and Successful Aging: Investigating the Relationships Between Lifetime Cognitive Change and Life Satisfaction

Abstract

Abstract. Social networks or support may contribute to successful aging. The Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 had their mental ability assessed at age 11 and 79. Almost 500 participants also rated their life satisfaction, social networks, and support at age 80. After controlling for age-11 IQ, sex, years of education, and social class, loneliness was the only social network/support characteristic adding significantly to the prediction of age-79 IQ, explaining about 2% of the variance; in old age, increased loneliness was associated with lower cognitive ability. Social network/support factors accounted for 23% of the variance in satisfaction with life ratings, with the greatest contributions from reduced loneliness (~12%) and having someone to talk to (~6%). Social network/support characteristics explained a greater proportion of the variance in life satisfaction ratings compared with later life cognition, although an individual's level of loneliness emerged as the largest single social support predictor of both outcomes. Possible causal pathways for these associations, which need to be studied in future research, are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.103

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Scottish Council for Research in Education (1933). The intelligence of Scottish children: A national survey of an age-group. London: University of London Press, Ltd

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–231 of 231

Metadata

Authors
Gow, A. J., Pattie, A., Whiteman, M. C., Whalley, L. J., & Deary, I. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Journal of Individual Differences
Published
2007-07
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
103-115
ISSN
  • 1614-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2299
OpenAlex
W2140961087
Cited by
231
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social support, successful aging, loneliness, social networks, life satisfaction, cognitive ability, Lothian Birth Cohort 1921, older adults, causal pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review