The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Properties of dust in the Martian atmosphere from the Imager on Mars Pathfinder
Abstract
The Imager for Mars Pathfinder (IMP) returned sequences of images of the Martian sky characterizing the size distribution, optical constants, and nature of the aerosols suspended in the atmosphere of Mars. These sequences were executed when the solar elevation angle was approximately 15° and consisted of images near the elevation of the Sun, spanning a range in azimuth from about 4° to 180° from the Sun. Images were obtained at four wavelengths from 444 to 965 nm. From one sequence of observations, results are shown from a comparison of absolute photometry of the Martian sky with multiple scattering models. Results include the following. (1) The geometric cross‐section‐weighted mean particle radius is 1.6 ± 0.15 μm almost independent of the assumed width (variance) of the size distribution. (2) The imaginary refractive index shows a steep increase with wavelength from 670 nm to shorter wavelengths, and a shallow increase toward longer wavelengths, consistent with the reflection spectrum observed by IMP for Martian soil. (3) For each assumed variance, two parameters governing the slope and curvature of the portion of the phase function due to internally transmitted light are found uniquely as functions of wavelength. (4) The variance of the gamma size distribution is difficult to constrain from these observations alone. The shape of the single scattering phase functions derived from the IMP observations is compared to laboratory measurements of powder samples. One sample of irregular particles has a single scattering phase function quite similar to that derived for Mars. Overall, the results for the mean cross‐section‐weighted size and imaginary refractive index as a function of wavelength are in remarkably good agreement with the revised analysis by Pollack et al. [1995] of the observations made by the Viking lander 20 years earlier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physics of wind-blown sand and dust
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 · Cited by 1,608
Clancy, R. T., Sandor, B. J., Wolff, M. J., Christensen, P. R., Smith, M. D., Pearl, J. C., Conrath, B. J., & Wilson, R. J. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1999je001089 · Cited by 398
Clancy, R. T., Wolff, M. J., & Christensen, P. R. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2003je002058 · Cited by 309
Golombek, M. P., & Bridges, N. T. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1999je001043 · Cited by 197
Mars in situ resource utilization: a review
Starr, S. O., & Muscatello, A. C. (2020) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2019.104824 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L. R., Lemmon, M., Smith, P. H., & Wegryn, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- E4
- Pages
- 8987-9007
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012430312
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of dust in the Martian atmosphere from the Imager on Mars Pathfinder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998je900016
- The paper
- Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L. R., Lemmon, M., Smith, P. H., & Wegryn, E. (1999). Properties of dust in the Martian atmosphere from the Imager on Mars Pathfinder. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998je900016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.