Erosion rates on Mars and implications for climate change: constraints from the Pathfinder landing site
Open accessAbstract
The observation that the Mars Pathfinder landing site looks very similar to its appearance after it was deposited by catastrophic floods around 1.8–3.5 Ga allows quantitative constraints to be placed on the rate of change of the site since that time. The abundance of erosional features such as an exhumed former soil horizon, sculpted wind tails, ripplelike and other lag deposits, and ventifacts (fluted and grooved rocks) all suggest the site has undergone net deflation or loss of 3–7 cm of material. The presence of barchan dunes and ventifacts argues for erosion by saltating crystalline sand‐size particles entrained in the wind. Most ventifacts probably formed soon after the catastrophic flood, which likely introduced a large, fresh supply of sand‐size particles distributed across the rocky plain. The strongest winds blew toward the northwest during this time, resulting in the sculpting of ventifacts, deflation of the surface, collections of dunes within Big Crater and other lows, and possibly preferentially eroding small crater rims. The predominant wind direction changed to blow toward the southwest, similar to today. These winds further deflated the surface, completed the deposition of sand‐size material in dunes and ultimately trapped these dunes in lows. The erosional features observed by Pathfinder indicate extremely low longterm deflation rates of 0.01–0.04 nm/yr since the end of the Hesperian (1.8–3.5 Ga) similar to less precise rates of <1 nm/yr based on the preservation of craters at the Viking 1 and Pathfinder landing sites. Short‐term redistribution rates (deposition and removal) of atmospheric dust at the Pathfinder landing site and preexisting dust and sand at other locations on Mars are up to 10 5 nm/yr. Estimates of erosion rates on Mars show a rapid decrease by 3–6 orders of magnitude from 10 2–10 4 nm/yr in Noachian terrains (characterized by rimless, flat‐floored craters and valley networks) to the exceedingly slow rates (10−2–10−1 nm/yr) operating during the Hesperian and Amazonian. Noachian erosion rates comparable to low continental denudation rates on Earth are consistent with erosion by running water and perhaps a more clement climate. The rapid decrease in erosion rates is consistent with a major climatic change during the Noachian, at the tail end of heavy bombardment, and a cold, dry, desiccating climate similar to today's since that time.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants.
“The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants (mostly early in the history of Mars) (McCauley, 1973; Malin and Edgett, 2000; Golombek and Bridges, 2000; Goetz et al., 2005; Yen et al., 2005; Murchie et al., 2009).”
From Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants (2019) · cites this paper as Golombek and Bridges, 2000
The Martian Surface Layer discussion describes sand and dust on Mars and identifies impact, volcanic, and mechanical weathering as sources of sand; it also discusses wind erosion and evidence for a wetter past. It does not establish that Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by all the listed processes, particularly erosion by lava and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Carr, M. H. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195099386.001.0001 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Geomorphic evolution of the Martian highlands through ancient fluvial processes
Craddock, R. A., & Maxwell, T. A. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/92je02508 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Christensen, P. R., and H. J. Moore, The Martian surface layer, in Mars, edited by H. H. Kieffer, B. M. Jakosky, C. W. Snyder, and M. S. Mat- thews, pp. 686-727, Univ. of Ariz. Press, Tucson, 1992.
- Greeley, R., and J. D. Iversen, Wind as a Geological Process on Earth, btars, Venus, and Titan, 333 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1985.
- Greeley, R., S. H. Williams, B. R. White, J. B. Pollack, and J. R. Marshall, Wind abrasion on Earth and Mars, in Models in Geomorphology, pp. 373-422, edited by J. M. Woldenberg, Allen and Unwin, Winchester, Mass., 1985.
- Greeley, R., N. Lancaster, S. Lee, and P. Thomas, Martian aeolian proc- esses, sediments, and features, in Mars, edited by H, H. Kieffer, B. M. Jakosky, C. W. Snyder, and M. S. Matthews, pp. 730-766, Univ. of Ariz. Press, Tucson, 1992.
- Arvidson, R., E. Guiness, and S. Lee, Differential aeolian redistribution Hartmann, W. K., et al., Chronology of planetary volcanism by compara- rates on Mars, Nature, 278, 533-535, 1979. five studies of planetary cratering, in Basaltic Volcanism on the Ter- Baker, V. R., and J. B. Partridge, Small Martian valleys: Pristine and de- restrial Planets, pp. 1049-1127, Pergamon, Tarrytown, N.Y., 1981. graded morphology, d. Geophys. Res., 91, 3561-3572, 1986.
- of Hviid, S. F., et al., Magnetic properties experiments on the Mars Pathfinder Ariz. Press, Tucson, 1992. lander: Preliminary results, Science, 278, 1768-1770, 1997.
- Landis, G. A., and P. P. Jenkins, Mars dust settling rate measured by the MAE on Sojourner rover, (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 79, Fall Meet. Suppl., F549, 1998.
- Parker, T. J., D. S. Gorsline, R. S. Saunders, D.C. Pieri, and D. M. Schneeberger, Coastal geomorphology of the Martian northern plains, d. Geophys. Res., 98, 11,061-11,078, 1993.
- Pettijohn, F. J., P. E. Potter, and R. Siever, Sand and Sandstone, 553 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.
- Saunders, I., and A. Young, Rates of surface processes on slopes, slope re- treat and denudation, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 8, 473-501, 1983.
- Tanaka, K. L., The stratigraphy of Mars, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf 17, Part 1, d. Geophys. Res., 91, suppl., E139~E158, 1986.
- Whitney, M. I., and J. F. Splettstoesser, Ventifacts and their formation: Darwin Mountains, Antarctica, in Catena Supplement 1, Aridic Soils and Geomorphic Processes, edited by D. H. Yalon, pp. 175-194,
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cratering Chronology and the Evolution of Mars
Hartmann, W. K., & Neukum, G. (2001) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1011945222010 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
New Perspectives on Ancient Mars
Solomon, S. C., Aharonson, O., Aurnou, J. M., Banerdt, W. B., Carr, M. H., Dombard, A. J., Frey, H. V., Golombek, M. P., Hauck, S. A., Head, J. W., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1101812 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Self-citationMars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants
Cannon, K. M., Britt, D. T., Smith, T. M., Fritsche, R. F., & Batcheldor, D. (2019) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.019 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Episodic warming of early Mars by punctuated volcanism
Halevy, I., & Head III, J. W. (2014) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2293 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
- Authors
- Golombek, M. P., & Bridges, N. T.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- E1
- Pages
- 1841-1853
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990289290
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- California Institute of Technology
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- Mars climate change, Hesperian period, Noachian period, Amazonian period, wind deflation, ventifacts, barchan dunes, saltation, catastrophic floods, wind direction, heavy bombardment, denudation rates, Mars geology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review