Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconstructed histories of the annual mean atmospheric mole fractions for the halocarbons CFC‐11 CFC‐12, CFC‐113, and carbon tetrachloride

Open access
Walker, S. J., Weiss, R. F., Salameh, P. K.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Annual mean mixing ratios for the halocarbons CFC‐11 (CCl 3 F), CFC‐12 (CCl 2 F 2), CFC‐113 (CClF 2 CCl 2 F), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4) have been determined from their first year of industrial production through 1998. From the late 1970s (in the case of CFC‐11 and CFC‐12) or early 1980s (in the case of CFC‐113 and carbon tetrachloride) the reported mixing ratios have been determined from experimental observations made by the Atmospheric Lifetime Experiment/Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment/Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment program. For years prior to these times we have used estimates of industrial emissions and atmospheric lifetimes to calculate historic concentrations. The likely error bounds of the annual mean values are also reported here. Errors in the annual mean mixing ratio may primarily be a result of incorrect industrial emissions data, an incorrect atmospheric lifetime, or uncertainty in the ALE/GAGE/AGAGE observations. Each of these possible sources of error has been considered separately. These results show that atmospheric concentrations for each of these compounds have experienced a rapid rise in the early part of their production. It is only within the past decade that rise rates have decreased sharply and (except in the case of CFC‐12) in the past few years that atmospheric concentrations have begun to decrease. The uncertainties in the reconstructed histories are a similar proportion for each of the chlorofluorocarbons (<4% for most of the history). However, uncertainty in the history of carbon tetrachloride is much greater (up to 12%), and this is mainly the result of poor knowledge of CCl 4 emissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jc900273

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Walker, S. J., Weiss, R. F., & Salameh, P. K.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2000-06-15
Volume
105
Issue
C6
Pages
14285-14296
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046610487
Cited by
288
References
15
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructed histories of the annual mean atmospheric mole fractions for the halocarbons CFC‐11 CFC‐12, CFC‐113, and carbon tetrachloride. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jc900273
The paper
Walker, S. J., Weiss, R. F., & Salameh, P. K. (2000). Reconstructed histories of the annual mean atmospheric mole fractions for the halocarbons CFC‐11 CFC‐12, CFC‐113, and carbon tetrachloride. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc900273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.