The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications
Abstract
The lumped‐structure approach for condensing organic chemical mechanisms is attractive, since it yields fewer species and reactions and reduces computational costs. This paper leads through the development of a new lumped‐structure mechanism, largely based on the widely used Carbon Bond Mechanism (CBM‐IV) developed by Gery et al. [1989]. The new mechanism called CBM‐Z extends the original framework to function properly at larger spatial and longer timescales. The major modifications in the mechanism include revised inorganic chemistry; explicit treatment of the lesser reactive paraffins, methane and ethane; revised parameterizations of the reactive paraffin, olefin, and aromatic reactions; inclusion of alkyl and acyl peroxy radical interactions and their reactions with NO 3; inclusion of organic nitrates and hydroperoxides; and refined isoprene chemistry based on the condensed one‐product mechanism of Carter [1996]. CBM‐Z was successfully evaluated along with the CBM‐IV, a partially revised CBM‐IV, and a revised Regional Acid Deposition Model (RADM2) mechanism [Stockwell et al., 1990; Kirchner and Stockwell, 1996] using the low NOx and volatile organic compound concentration smog chamber experiments of Simonaitis et al. [1997]. Box model versions of the four mechanisms were also evaluated under a variety of hypothetical urban and rural scenarios for a period of 30 days. Results from CBM‐Z and revised RADM2 were found to be within ±20% of each other, while CBM‐IV and revised CBM‐IV results deviated significantly by up to 50–95%. Sensitivity tests were performed to elucidate the effects of some of the new features added in CBM‐Z. Relative computational memory and time requirements of these mechanisms are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains
Giorgi, F., Coppola, E., Solmon, F., Mariotti, L., Sylla, M., Bi, X., Elguindi, N., Diro, G., Nair, V, Giuliani, G., et al. (2012) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr01018 · Cited by 1,456
Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006721 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationPeng, L., Liu, F., Zhou, M., Li, M., Zhang, Q., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.007 · Cited by 98
Marelle, L., Thomas, J. L., Raut, J.-C., Law, K. S., Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Kim, J., Reiter, A., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-2359-2016 · Cited by 92
Effects of ground-level ozone pollution on yield and economic losses of winter wheat in Henan, China
Wang, T., Zhang, L., Zhou, S., Zhang, T., Zhai, S., Yang, Z., Wang, D., & Song, H. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118654 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaveri, R. A., & Peters, L. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- D23
- Pages
- 30387-30415
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067318157
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd900876
- The paper
- Zaveri, R. A., & Peters, L. K. (1999). A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.