Cited by 92Maritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Air quality and radiative impacts of Arctic shipping emissions in the summertime in northern Norway: from the local to the regional scale

Open access
Marelle, Louis, Thomas, Jennie L., Raut, Jean-Christophe, Law, Kathy S., Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka, Johansson, Lasse, Roiger, Anke, Schlager, Hans +3 more·2016·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In this study, we quantify the impacts of shipping pollution on air quality and shortwave radiative effect in northern Norway, using WRF-Chem (Weather Research and Forecasting with chemistry) simulations combined with high-resolution, real-time STEAM2 (Ship Traffic Emissions Assessment Model version 2) shipping emissions. STEAM2 emissions are evaluated using airborne measurements from the ACCESS (Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society) aircraft campaign, which was conducted in the summer 2012, in two ways. First, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) are derived for specific ships by combining in situ measurements in ship plumes and FLEXPART-WRF plume dispersion modeling, and these values are compared to STEAM2 emissions for the same ships. Second, regional WRF-Chem runs with and without STEAM2 ship emissions are performed at two different resolutions, 3 km × 3 km and 15 km × 15 km, and evaluated against measurements along flight tracks and average campaign profiles in the marine boundary layer and lower troposphere. These comparisons show that differences between STEAM2 emissions and calculated emissions can be quite large (−57 to +148 %) for individual ships, but that WRF-Chem simulations using STEAM2 emissions reproduce well the average NO x , SO 2 and O 3 measured during ACCESS flights. The same WRF-Chem simulations show that the magnitude of NO x and ozone (O 3 ) production from ship emissions at the surface is not very sensitive (< 5 %) to the horizontal grid resolution (15 or 3 km), while surface PM 10 particulate matter enhancements due to ships are moderately sensitive (15 %) to resolution. The 15 km resolution WRF-Chem simulations are used to estimate the regional impacts of shipping pollution in northern Norway. Our results indicate that ship emissions are an important source of pollution along the Norwegian coast, enhancing 15-day-averaged surface concentrations of NO x ( ∼ +80 %), SO 2 ( ∼ +80 %), O 3 ( ∼ +5 %), black carbon ( ∼ +40 %), and PM 2.5 ( ∼ +10 %). The residence time of black carbon originating from shipping emissions is 1.4 days. Over the same 15-day period, ship emissions in northern Norway have a global shortwave (direct + semi-direct + indirect) radiative effect of −9.3 m Wm −2 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-16-2359-2016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Future shipping may lead to significant increases in ozone levels, introducing a potential extra burden on already stressed Arctic ecosystems.

    “As discussed earlier, future shipping may also lead to signi fi cant increases in ozone levels (Granier et al., 2006; Marelle et al., 2016) thus introducing a potential extra burden on the already stressed Arctic ecosystems.”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Marelle et al., 2016

    Section 5.2.1 reports that shipping increased modeled surface ozone by about 6% along the northern Norwegian coast during a 15-day period in 2012, and the Introduction projects growth in Arctic shipping. The paper does not quantify future ozone increases; its Conclusions say the study's limited region and timescale prevent assessment of some wider shipping impacts. The potential burden on Arctic ecosystems is the citing authors' inference, not a finding reported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using the STEAM2 emissions, Marelle et al. (2016) simulated enhancements in ozone (5%), BC (40%), and PM2.5 (10%) for the Norwegian coast during July 2012.

    “Using the STEAM2 emissions, Marelle et al. (2016) simulated enhancements in ozone (5%), BC (40%), and PM2.5 (10%) for the Norwegian coast during July 2012.”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Marelle et al., 2016

  • Changes in ozone concentrations depend strongly on dispersion of precursor emissions due to nonlinearity in the relationship between ozone production rates and NOx concentration.

    “In addition, changes in ozone concentrations depend strongly on dispersion of precursor emissions due to nonlinearity in the relationship between ozone production rates and NO x concentration (Marelle et al., 2016; Ryerson et al., 2001).”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Marelle et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Ahmadov, R., McKeen, S., Trainer, M., Banta, R., Brewer, A., Brown, S., Edwards, P. M., de Gouw, J. A., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J., Helmig, D., Johnson, B., Karion, A., Koss, A., Langford, A., Lerner, B., Olson, J., Oltmans, S., Peischl, J., Pétron, G., Pichugina, Y., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T., Schnell, R., Senff, C., Sweeney, C., Thompson, C., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Wild, R., Williams, E. J., Yuan, B., and Zamora, R.: Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil-and natural gas- producing region of the western US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 411-429, doi:10.5194/acp-15-411-2015, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aliabadi, A. A., Staebler, R. M., and Sharma, S.: Air quality mon- itoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution, At- mos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2651-2673, doi:10.5194/acp-15-2651- 2015, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beecken, J., Mellqvist, J., Salo, K., Ekholm, J., Jalkanen, J.-P., Jo- hansson, L., Litvinenko, V., Volodin, K., and Frank-Kamenetsky, D. A.: Emission factors of SO 2 , NO x and particles from ships in Neva Bay from ground-based and helicopter-borne measure- ments and AIS-based modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5229- 5241, doi:10.5194/acp-15-5229-2015, 2015. · DOI
  4. Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.- K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  5. Brioude, J., Arnold, D., Stohl, A., Cassiani, M., Morton, D., Seibert, P., Angevine, W., Evan, S., Dingwell, A., Fast, J. D., Easter, R. C., Pisso, I., Burkhart, J., and Wotawa, G.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF ver- sion 3.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1889-1904, doi:10.5194/gmd- 6-1889-2013, 2013. · DOI
  6. Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 mod- eling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitiv- ity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569-585, doi:10.1175/1520- 0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.Co;2, 2001. · DOI
  7. Cohan, D. S., Hu, Y., and Russell, A. G.: Dependence of ozone sensitivity analysis on grid resolution, Atmos. Environ., 40, 126- 135, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.031, 2006. · DOI
  8. Cooper, D. A.: Exhaust emissions from high-speed passenger ferries, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4189-4200, doi:10.1016/S1352- 2310(01)00192-3, 2001. · DOI
  9. Corbett, J. J. and Köhler, H. W.: Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4650, doi:10.1029/2003JD003751, 2003. · DOI
  10. Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., and Lauer, A.: Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8512-8518, doi:10.1021/es071686z, 2007. · DOI
  11. Corbett, J. J., Lack, D. A., Winebrake, J. J., Harder, S., Silber- man, J. A., and Gold, M.: Arctic shipping emissions invento- ries and future scenarios, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9689-9704, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9689-2010, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dalsøren, S. B., Endresen, Ø., Isaksen, I. S. A., Gravir, G., and Sørgård, E.: Environmental impacts of an expected increase in sea transportation, with particular focus on oil and gas scenar- ios for Norway and northwest Russia, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02310, doi:10.1029/2005JD006927, 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dalsøren, S. B., Eide, M. S., Endresen, Ø., Mjelde, A., Gravir, G., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Update on emissions and environmental im- pacts from the international fleet of ships: the contribution from major ship types and ports, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2171-2194, doi:10.5194/acp-9-2171-2009, 2009. · DOI
  14. Dalsøren, S. B., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Corbett, J. J., Minjares, R., Lack, D., and Fuglestvedt, J. S.: Environmental impacts of shipping in 2030 with a particular focus on the Arctic region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1941-1955, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1941- 2013, 2013. · DOI
  15. Eckhardt, S., Hermansen, O., Grythe, H., Fiebig, M., Stebel, K., Cassiani, M., Baecklund, A., and Stohl, A.: The influence of cruise ship emissions on air pollution in Svalbard -a harbinger of a more polluted Arctic?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8401-8409, doi:10.5194/acp-13-8401-2013, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43-67, doi:10.5194/gmd- 3-43-2010, 2010. · DOI
  17. Endresen, Ø., Sørgård, E., Sundet, J. K., Dalsøren, S. B., Isak- sen, I. S. A., Berglen, T. F., and Gravir, G.: Emission from in- ternational sea transportation and environmental impact, J. Geo- phys. Res., 108, 4560, doi:10.1029/2002JD002898, 2003. EPA: Analysis of commercial marine vessels emissions and fuel consumption data, Tech. Rep. EPA420-R-00-002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, available at: http:// www.epa.gov/oms/models/nonrdmdl/c-marine/r00002.pdf (last access: 29 June 2015), 2000. · DOI
  18. Eyring, V., Stevenson, D. S., Lauer, A., Dentener, F. J., Butler, T., Collins, W. J., Ellingsen, K., Gauss, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Lawrence, M. G., Richter, A., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., van Noije, T. P. C., and Wild, O.: Multi-model simulations of the impact of international shipping on Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate in 2000 and 2030, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 757-780, doi:10.5194/acp-7-757-2007, 2007. · DOI
  19. Eyring, V., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. J., Cor- bett, J. J., Endresen, O., Grainger, R. G., Moldanova, J., Schlager, H., and Stevenson, D. S.: Transport impacts on atmo- sphere and climate: shipping, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4735-4771, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.059, 2010. · DOI
  20. Fast, J. D., Gustafson Jr., W. W. I., Easter, R., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G., and Peckham, S.: Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radia- tive forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D21305, doi:10.1029/2005JD006721, 2006. · DOI
  21. Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fa- hey, D., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Van Dorland, R.: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, Cli- mate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter- governmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  22. Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T., Eyring, V., Isaksen, I., Lee, D., and Sausen, R.: Shipping emissions: from cooling to warming of climate-and reducing impacts on health, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 9057-9062, doi:10.1021/es901944r, 2009. · DOI
  23. Fuglestvedt, J. S., Dalsøren, S. B., Samset, B. H., Berntsen, T., Myhre, G., Hodnebrog, Ø., Eide, M. S., and Bergh, T. F.: Cli- mate penalty for shifting shipping to the Arctic, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13273-13279, doi:10.1021/es502379d, 2014. · DOI
  24. Granier, C., Niemeier, U., Jungclaus, J. H., Emmons, L., Hess, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Walters, S., and Brasseur, G. P.: Ozone pollution from future ship traffic in the Arctic northern passages, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13807, doi:10.1029/2006GL026180, 2006. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Grell, G. A. and Devenyi, D.: A generalized approach to pa- rameterizing convection combining ensemble and data as- similation techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 38.1-38.4, doi:10.1029/2002GL015311, 2002. · DOI
  26. Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181-3210, doi:10.5194/acp-6- 3181-2006, 2006. · DOI
  27. Huszar, P., Cariolle, D., Paoli, R., Halenka, T., Belda, M., Schlager, H., Miksovsky, J., and Pisoft, P.: Modeling the regional impact of ship emissions on NO x and ozone levels over the Eastern At- lantic and Western Europe using ship plume parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6645-6660, doi:10.5194/acp-10-6645- 2010, 2010. · DOI
  28. Jalkanen, J.-P., Brink, A., Kalli, J., Pettersson, H., Kukkonen, J., and Stipa, T.: A modelling system for the exhaust emissions of marine traffic and its application in the Baltic Sea area, At- mos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9209-9223, doi:10.5194/acp-9-9209-2009, 2009. · DOI
  29. Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., Kukkonen, J., Brink, A., Kalli, J., and Stipa, T.: Extension of an assessment model of ship traffic exhaust emissions for particulate matter and carbon monoxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2641-2659, doi:10.5194/acp-12-2641- 2012, 2012. · DOI
  30. Jonson, J. E., Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., Gauss, M., and De- nier van der Gon, H. A. C.: Model calculations of the effects of present and future emissions of air pollutants from shipping in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 783- 798, doi:10.5194/acp-15-783-2015, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lana, A., Bell, T., Simó, R., Vallina, S., Ballabrera-Poy, J., Ket- tle, A., Dachs, J., Bopp, L., Saltzman, E., Stefels, J., Johnson, J., and Liss, P.: An updated climatology of surface dimethlysulfide concentrations and emission fluxes in the global ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB1004, doi:10.1029/2010GB003850, 2011. · DOI
  32. Lee, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Lee, H., Dickerson, R. R., Hains, J. C., Krotkov, N., Richter, A., Vinnikov, K., and Schwab, J. J.: SO 2 emissions and lifetimes: Estimates from inverse modeling using in situ and global, space-based (SCIAMACHY and OMI) observations, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D06304, doi:10.1029/2010JD014758, 2011. · DOI
  33. Lund, M. T., Eyring, V., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Lee, D., and Righi, M.: Global-mean temperature change from shipping toward 2050: improved representation of the indirect aerosol effect in simple climate models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8868-8877, doi:10.1021/es301166e, 2012. · DOI
  34. Miola, A. and Ciuffo, B.: Estimating air emissions from ships: Meta-analysis of modelling approaches and avail- able data sources, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2242-2251, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.046, 2011. · DOI
  35. Molders, N., Porter, S., Cahill, C., and Grell, G.: Influence of ship emissions on air quality and input of contaminants in southern Alaska National Parks and wilderness areas dur- ing the 2006 tourist season, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1400-1413, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.003, 2010. · DOI
  36. Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform pre- cipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 991-1007, doi:10.1175/2008mwr2556.1, 2009. · DOI
  37. Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: An improved Mellor-Yamada Level-3 Model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional pre- diction of advection fog, Bound. Lay. Meteorol., 119, 397-407, doi:10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8, 2006. · DOI
  38. Ødemark, K., Dalsøren, S. B., Samset, B. H., Berntsen, T. K., Fu- glestvedt, J. S., and Myhre, G.: Short-lived climate forcers from current shipping and petroleum activities in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1979-1993, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1979-2012, 2012. · DOI
  39. Peters, G. P., Nilssen, T. B., Lindholt, L., Eide, M. S., Glomsrød, S., Eide, L. I., and Fuglestvedt, J. S.: Future emissions from shipping and petroleum activities in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5305-5320, doi:10.5194/acp-11-5305-2011, 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Petzold, A., Hasselbach, J., Lauer, P., Baumann, R., Franke, K., Gurk, C., Schlager, H., and Weingartner, E.: Experimental stud- ies on particle emissions from cruising ship, their characteris- tic properties, transformation and atmospheric lifetime in the marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2387-2403, doi:10.5194/acp-8-2387-2008, 2008. · DOI
  41. Prank, M., Sofiev, M., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Kaasik, M., Ruuskanen, T. M., and Kukkonen, J.: A refinement of the emis- sion data for Kola Peninsula based on inverse dispersion mod- elling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10849-10865, doi:10.5194/acp- 10-10849-2010, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  42. RINA (Royal Institute of Naval Architects): Significant Ships of 2009, Pensord Press, Blackwood, UK, 2010.
  43. Roiger, A., Thomas, J.-L., Schlager, H., Law, K. S., Kim, J., Schäfler, A., Weinzierl, B., Dahlkötter, F., Krisch, I., Marelle, L., Minikin, A., Raut, J.-C., Reiter, A., Rose, M., Scheibe, M., Stock, P., Baumann, R., Bouarar, I., Clerbaux, C., George, M., Onishi, T., and Flemming, J.: Quantifying emerging local an- thropogenic emissions in the Arctic region: the ACCESS air- craft campaign experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 441-460, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00169.1, 2015. · DOI
  44. Saide, P. E., Spak, S. N., Carmichael, G. R., Mena-Carrasco, M. A., Yang, Q., Howell, S., Leon, D. C., Snider, J. R., Bandy, A. R., Collett, J. L., Benedict, K. B., de Szoeke, S. P., Hawkins, L. N., Allen, G., Crawford, I., Crosier, J., and Springston, S. R.: Evaluating WRF-Chem aerosol indirect effects in Southeast Pa- cific marine stratocumulus during VOCALS-REx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3045-3064, doi:10.5194/acp-12-3045-2012, 2012. · DOI
  45. Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Herber, A., Kondo, Y., Li, S.-M., Moteki, N., Koike, M., Oshima, N., Schwarz, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Lamar- que, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Zhang, K.: Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observa- tions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12465-12477, doi:10.5194/acp- 14-12465-2014, 2014. · DOI
  46. Smith, L. and Stephenson, S.: New trans-arctic shipping routes nav- igable by midcentury, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, E1191- E1195, doi:10.1073/pnas.1214212110, 2013. · DOI
  47. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461-2474, doi:10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005, 2005. · DOI
  48. Stroeve, J., Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., Kay, J. E., Malanik, J., and Barrett, A. P.: The Arctic's rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis, Climatic Change, 110, 1005-1027, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1, 2011. · DOI
  49. Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., Jacob, D. J., and Meijer, E. W.: Accounting for non-linear chemistry of ship plumes in the GEOS-Chem global chemistry transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11707-11722, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11707-2011, 2011. · DOI
  50. Winebrake, J., Corbett, J., Green, E., Lauer, A., and Eyring, V.: Miti- gating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: an assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates, Environ. Sci. Tech- nol., 43, 4776-4782, doi:10.1021/es803224q, 2009. · DOI
  51. Yang, Q., W. I. Gustafson Jr., Fast, J. D., Wang, H., Easter, R. C., Morrison, H., Lee, Y.-N., Chapman, E. G., Spak, S. N., and Mena-Carrasco, M. A.: Assessing regional scale predictions of aerosols, marine stratocumulus, and their interactions dur- ing VOCALS-REx using WRF-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11951-11975, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11951-2011, 2011. · DOI
  52. Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13204, doi:10.1029/2007JD008792, 2008. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marelle, L., Thomas, J. L., Raut, J.-C., Law, K. S., Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Kim, J., Reiter, A., & Weinzierl, B.
Affiliations
  • Total (France) (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Marelle, Louis
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
2359-2379
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W2106676828
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (265863)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-BS56-0021)
  • Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
air quality, WRF-Chem, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, ozone formation, black carbon, PM2.5, PM10, marine boundary layer, grid resolution sensitivity, Arctic air pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review