Cited by 243Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics

Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants

Cannon, Kevin M., Britt, Daniel T., Smith, Trent M., Fritsche, Ralph F., Batcheldor, Daniel·2019·Icarus

Abstract

Abstract The composition and physical properties of martian regolith are dramatically better understood compared to just a decade ago, particularly through the use of X-ray diffraction by the Curiosity rover. Because there are no samples of this regolith on Earth, researchers and engineers rely on terrestrial simulants to test future hardware and address fundamental science and engineering questions. Even with eventual sample return, the amount of material brought back would not be enough for bulk studies. Many existing Mars simulants were designed 10 or 20 years ago based on a more rudimentary understanding of martian surface materials. Here, we describe the Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a new open standard designed as a high fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater. We developed prototype simulants using the MGS-1 standard and characterized their basic physical properties, bulk chemistry, spectral properties, and volatile content. The MGS-1 based simulant compares favorably to rover and remote sensing observations from Mars, and offers dramatic improvements over past simulants in many areas. Modest amounts of simulant will be produced by the Center for Lunar & Asteroid Surface Science (CLASS) Exolith Lab to distribute to other researchers. By publishing the mineral recipe and production methods, we anticipate that other groups can re-create the simulant and modify it as they see fit, leading to a more sustainable model for simulant production and the possibility of extending the simulant for different regions on Mars or for different applications.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper introduces MGS-1, an open-standard mineralogical analog for global basaltic martian regolith based on the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater. Prototype simulants made to the MGS-1 recipe show favorable spectral, volatile, and physical-property comparisons to Mars observations and improve on older simulants such as JSC Mars-1 and MMS.

Key findings

  • The MGS-1 standard is a mineral recipe with crystalline phases: plagioclase 29.4 wt.%, pyroxene 20.5 wt.%, olivine 16.2 wt.%, magnetite 1.5 wt.%, anhydrite 1.1 wt.%, hematite 0.8 wt.%; amorphous phases: basaltic glass 20.0 wt.%, Fe-sulfate 6.0 wt.%, ferrihydrite 2.7 wt.%, Fe-carbonate 1.9 wt.%.
  • Prototype MGS-1 simulant had grain density 2.72 g/cm³, bulk density 1.23 g/cm³, and porosity 55%; TGA showed 3.4% mass loss below 300 °C and an additional 4.5% between 300 and 1000 °C.
  • Calculated MGS-1 bulk chemistry was within ~2 wt.% of bulk Rocknest for all major oxide species, though prototype XRF measurements deviated most in CaO, FeO, and MgO due to the terrestrial silicate crystal chemistries used.
  • MGS-1 spectra were similar to Rocknest Mastcam spectra from 400–1100 nm and to low-albedo OMEGA regions at longer wavelengths, but the simulant was brighter and had a weaker negative spectral slope >1000 nm; JSC Mars-1, MMS-1, and MMS-2 were not close matches to Rocknest or low-albedo OMEGA terrains.

Methods

  • The standard was designed from mineralogy, using CheMin XRD constraints on crystalline Rocknest soil and inferences about the amorphous component, then re-normalized to a 30% amorphous content.
  • Prototype simulants were produced by mixing plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, basaltic glass, magnetite, and hematite with water and sodium metasilicate pentahydrate in a 100:20:2 ratio, microwaving to form solid cobbles, grinding them, and mixing in water-soluble phases: iron(III) sulfate, ferrihydrite, anhydrite, and siderite.
  • Characterization included SEM imaging, grain and bulk density measurements, XRF bulk chemistry, VNIR spectroscopy from 320–2550 nm, and TGA to 1000 °C at 30 °C/min; results were compared with Mars rover, orbital, and older simulant data.

Limitations

  • The paper states MGS-1 is not a perfect standard: trace species such as phosphates, sulfides, chromates, and oxalates are not represented, shocked silicates are not accounted for, and the exact nature and amount of the amorphous component in martian soils remains uncertain.
  • The authors state that terrestrial source minerals differ in crystal chemistry from Rocknest, affecting CaO, FeO, and MgO; XRF has difficulty measuring Na and S; TGA comparisons to Mars data require care because of different pressures, atmospheric compositions, and ramp rates.
  • The paper states MGS-1 is not recommended for detailed geochemical studies such as aqueous alteration experiments, and that geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained, particle shape was not controlled, and initial physical-properties measurements were limited.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.019

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

25 of 60 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9

    The detected crystalline phases in Rocknest include plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, magnetite, anhydrite, hematite, ilmenite, sanidine, and quartz.

    “The detected crystalline phases in Rocknest include plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, magnetite, anhydrite, hematite, ilmenite, sanidine, and quartz (Bish et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al., 2013 source
  • Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    Martian soils are a subequal mixture of crystalline and amorphous phases, as revealed by the CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory.

    “In contrast, martian soils are a subequal mixture of crystalline and amorphous phases, as revealed by the CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) (Bish et al., 2013; Dehouck et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al., 2013 source

      The “Amorphous or Poorly Ordered Components” section (page not specified) reports that CheMin found both crystalline and amorphous phases in Rocknest soil, but estimates the amorphous fraction at 27 wt%, leaving roughly 73 wt% crystalline—not a subequal mixture by the central estimates. The Discussion suggests the results may apply to other Martian soils, but does not establish the same proportions for Martian soils generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Dehouck et al., 2014 source
  • Premisecitation
    § 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9

    The crystalline fraction of Rocknest is well constrained by X-ray diffraction.

    “The crystalline fraction of Rocknest is well constrained by XRD (Bish et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al., 2013 source
  • Premisecitation
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 8

    Rocknest is the best-characterized martian soil to date.

    “Rocknest is the bestcharacterized martian soil to date (Bish et al., 2013; Blake et al., 2013; Leshin et al., 2013; Minitti et al., 2013; Archer et al., 2014; Sutter et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al., 2013 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) reports a rich inventory of crystalline and amorphous phases in Rocknest soil and says the XRD results provide critical ground-truth information. This supports Rocknest being well characterized mineralogically, but the paper does not establish that it is the best-characterized Martian soil overall or to date. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Blake et al., 2013 source
    • cites Leshin et al., 2013 source

      The opening Rocknest sampling passage and the Isotopes section document extensive analyses of Rocknest fines, including mineralogy, volatiles, and isotopes. They support that Rocknest was well characterized, but the paper does not compare the extent of its characterization with all other Martian soils or establish the 'best-characterized to date' superlative. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    The SAM water release is consistent with the 1.5 wt.% water equivalent hydrogen in the upper layer of Rocknest materials measured by DAN.

    “This is consistent with the 1.5 wt.% water equivalent hydrogen in the upper layer of Rocknest materials measured by DAN (Jun et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jun et al., 2013 source
  • May combine two claims. 43
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 49
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 10

    Crystalline carbonates were not detected in Rocknest, but evolved gas analysis suggests that one or more carbonate-bearing phases is present.

    “Crystalline carbonates were not detected in Rocknest, but evolved gas analysis suggests that one or more carbonate-bearing phases is present (Sutter et al., 2017), such that a mixture could be present, or the carbonates could be poorly crystalline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sutter et al., 2017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11

    The detection of evolved ClO4 in Rocknest suggests that a mixture of (per)chlorate salts is likely present, or they are present as amorphous/adsorbed species.

    “This suggests that a mixture of such salts is likely present, or they are present as amorphous/adsorbed species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2014 source

      Section 3.3 (page unavailable) says evolved O₂ is consistent with decomposition of an oxychlorine salt such as perchlorate; it does not report detection of evolved ClO₄. Sections 3.1 and 3.2 favor Ca-perchlorate while leaving Mg-perchlorate possible, but do not conclude that a mixture is likely or that the salts occur as amorphous or adsorbed species. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11

    No crystalline (per)chlorate salts were detected in Rocknest above the ~1 wt.% detection limit, but evolved ClO4 was detected.

    “No crystalline (per)chlorate salts were detected in Rocknest above the ~1 wt.% detection limit, but evolved ClO4 was detected (Archer et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2014 source

      Section 3.1 (page unavailable) says CheMin did not detect a perchlorate salt in Rocknest and that estimated abundances were below its detection limits. Section 3.3 (page unavailable) reports evolved O₂ and chlorinated hydrocarbons consistent with perchlorate decomposition, not detection of evolved ClO₄. The cited passages also do not establish a ~1 wt.% detection limit for (per)chlorate salts. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7

    The soil itself has a basaltic composition, derived from a globally basaltic crust.

    “The soil itself has a basaltic composition (Yen et al., 2005; Ming and Morris, 2017), derived from a globally basaltic crust (McSween et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Yen et al., 2005 source
    • cites Ming and Morris, 2017
    • cites McSween et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11

    Oxychlorine species are present in martian soil and could include (per)chlorate salts and/or peroxide species; nitrates are also present.

    “Oxychlorine species are also present in martian soil and could include (per)chlorate salts (Hecht et al., 2009; Sutter et al., 2017) and/or peroxide species (Clancy et al., 2004; Crandall et al., 2017). Nitrates are also present (Stern et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hecht et al., 2009 source
    • cites Sutter et al., 2017 source
    • cites Stern et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Source materials · p. 13

    Unit cell parameters for Rocknest minerals indicate ~An57 plagioclase, a mixture of augite and pigeonite, and ~Fo40 olivine.

    “Unit cell parameters for Rocknest minerals indicate ~An57 plagioclase (Bish et al., 2013), a mixture of augite and pigeonite (Bish et al., 2013), and ~Fo40 olivine (Morris et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al., 2013 source
    • cites Morris et al., 2015
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7

    The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants.

    “The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants (mostly early in the history of Mars) (McCauley, 1973; Malin and Edgett, 2000; Golombek and Bridges, 2000; Goetz et al., 2005; Yen et al., 2005; Murchie et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McCauley, 1973 source
    • cites Malin and Edgett, 2000 source
    • cites Golombek and Bridges, 2000 source

      The Martian Surface Layer discussion describes sand and dust on Mars and identifies impact, volcanic, and mechanical weathering as sources of sand; it also discusses wind erosion and evidence for a wetter past. It does not establish that Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by all the listed processes, particularly erosion by lava and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    Most older simulant varieties contain almost no sulfur, whereas martian regolith contains up to 6 wt.% SO3, assuming all sulfur is in the form of sulfate.

    “Most of the older simulant varieties contain almost no sulfur, whereas martian regolith contains up to 6 wt.% SO3 (assuming all S is in the form of sulfate; Yen et al., 2005; Ming and Morris, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yen et al., 2005 source
    • cites Ming and Morris, 2017

      The Chemical Properties section (Table 1; page unavailable) reports 4.90 wt.% SO3 for average Martian soil, supporting the presence of sulfur at roughly the claimed level. But it also reports 7.42 wt.% for dust and a soil maximum of 35.06 wt.%, so 6 wt.% is not an upper limit. The cited paper does not address sulfur in older simulants or state the assumption that all sulfur is sulfate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7

    Martian dust is somewhat chemically distinct from the underlying soil, with a larger component of nanophase iron oxides responsible for its ochre hue.

    “Martian dust is somewhat chemically distinct from the underlying soil, with a larger component of npOx responsible for its ochre hue (Morris et al., 2001; Berger et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Morris et al., 2001 source
    • cites Berger et al., 2016 source

      The Results and Discussion report that Martian dust is compositionally similar to soil but enriched in Fe, S, and Cl; the Discussion also concludes that global dust is enriched in nanophase iron oxide (npOx). The cited paper does not say that npOx is responsible for the dust’s ochre hue. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7

    Soil major element chemistry and mineralogy are quite similar at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites, supporting the presence of a global basaltic soil.

    “Soil major element chemistry and mineralogy are quite similar at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites (Yen et al., 2013; Ming and Morris, 2017), supporting the presence of a global basaltic soil that may be locally to regionally enriched in rarer evolved volcanic compositions (e.g., Christensen et al., 2005) or alteration phases (e.g., Squyres et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yen et al., 2013
    • cites Ming and Morris, 2017

      The Chemical Properties section (page not supplied) says basaltic soil at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites has similar composition, supporting the claim about chemistry and a widespread basaltic soil. It also notes differences in local basaltic mineralogies; the Mineralogical Properties section describes minerals observed by the rovers but does not establish that mineralogy is quite similar across all three sites. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    The SAM instrument detected a broad H2O release in Rocknest starting at low temperatures, finding 2.0 ± 1.3 wt.% total evolved water averaged over four runs.

    “the SAM instrument detected a broad H2O release in Rocknest starting at low temperatures, finding 2.0 ± 1.3 wt.% total evolved water averaged over four runs (Archer et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 46

    Mastcam data in Figure 4 were reproduced from Fig. 5 in Wellington et al. (2017).

    “Mastcam data (filled circles) were reproduced from Fig. 5 in Wellington et al. (2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wellington et al. (2017) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 18

    Pike et al. (2011) reported that ~1 vol.% of Phoenix surface materials were <4 μm.

    “Pike et al. (2011) reported that ~1 vol. % of the Phoenix surface materials were <4 µm”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pike et al. (2011) source

      The Approach and Results section describes a cumulative-volume particle-size distribution for Phoenix soil, and the Discussion reports less than 0.05% by volume below 2 µm. The passages do not give a volume fraction below 4 µm, so they do not establish the claimed ~1 vol.%. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 18

    Ming and Morris (2017) estimate that 15-25 wt.% of typical soils should consist of clay-sized grains due to chemical alteration.

    “Ming and Morris (2017) estimate that due to chemical alteration, 15-25 wt.% of typical soils should consist of clay-sized grains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ming and Morris (2017)
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 42

    The calculated MGS-1 composition was weighted by the proportions in Table 1, with the actual crystal chemistries of martian silicates from Bish et al. (2013) and Morris et al. (2015).

    “weighted by the proportions in Table 1, with the actual crystal chemistries of martian silicates from Bish et al. (2013) and Morris et al. (2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bish et al. (2013) source
    • cites Morris et al. (2015)
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 14

    Upon heating and drying, sodium metasilicate forms a polymer network that acts as a binder, such that the resulting cobbles are solid and quite hard.

    “Upon heating and drying, the sodium metasilicate forms a polymer network that acts as a binder, such that the resulting cobbles are solid and quite hard (Fig. 2c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 11

    Ferric sulfate and iron carbonate can be synthesized in amorphous form by evaporating appropriate solutions in vacuum, but they are prone to recrystallize in normal laboratory conditions.

    “These species can be synthesized in amorphous form by evaporating appropriate solutions in vacuum, but they are prone to recrystallize in normal laboratory conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5.1 Applications · p. 22

    JSC Mars-1 has virtually none of the same minerals as actual Mars soil, and its volatile content (>20 wt.% H2O) is highly unrealistic.

    “JSC Mars-1 is not recommended for these applications because it has virtually none of the same minerals as actual Mars soil, and its volatile content (>20 wt.% H2O) is highly unrealistic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19

    The negative spectral slope at wavelengths >1000 nm in remote data is not as strong in the MGS-1 simulant, and the simulant is brighter.

    “However, the negative spectral slope at wavelengths >1000 nm in the remote data is not as strong in the simulant, and the simulant is brighter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19

    JSC Mars-1 has a significantly higher albedo than remote measurements, with strong H2O- and OH-related absorptions at 1400 and 1900 nm.

    “JSC Mars-1 has a significantly higher albedo than the remote measurements, with strong H2O- and OHrelated absorptions at 1400 and 1900 nm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17

    The particle size distribution of simulants is highly adjustable through crushing and sieving.

    “The particle size distribution of simulants is highly adjustable through crushing and sieving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2 Bulk chemistry · p. 18

    SiO2, Al2O3, and SO3 in MGS-1 prototypes are much closer to Rocknest measured values and compare favorably to older martian simulants.

    “Other elements such as SiO2, Al2O3, and SO3 are much closer to the measured values from Rocknest, and compare favorably to older martian simulants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19

    MMS-1 and MMS-2 have even higher albedos than JSC Mars-1, and at shorter wavelengths are dominated by the signature of hematite.

    “The MMS-1 and MMS-2 simulants from The Martian Garden company have even higher albedos than JSC-Mars 1, and at shorter wavelengths are dominated by the signature of hematite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 41

    In the prototype simulants, crystalline siderite was added.

    “In the prototype simulants we added crystalline siderite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 41

    In the prototype simulants, crystalline iron (III) sulfate pentahydrate was added.

    “In the prototype simulants we added crystalline iron (III) sulfate pentahydrate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 5.1 Applications · p. 23

    There are apparent changes between MMS and MMS-1/2.

    “Again, due to apparent changes between MMS and MMS-1/2, we do not recommend these simulants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1.0 Introduction · p. 4

    The utility of JSC Mars-1, MMS, and their updated versions comes mostly from being fine-grained, roughly basaltic composition materials; this may be appropriate for certain uses that do not require high fidelity simulants, but inappropriate for others.

    “The utility of these simulants (JSC Mars-1, MMS, and their updated versions) comes mostly from the fact that they are fine-grained, roughly basaltic composition materials: this may be appropriate for certain uses that do not require high fidelity simulants, but inappropriate for others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    JSC Mars-1 is extremely hygroscopic, contains >20 wt.% H2O at ambient conditions, and is known to contain significant amounts of organic matter.

    “JSC Mars-1 is extremely hygroscopic, contains >20 wt.% H2O at ambient conditions, and is known to contain significant amounts of organic matter as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9

    Magnetite, anhydrite and hematite were near the detection limit, but magnetite is important for magnetic properties, anhydrite for sulfur contents, and hematite for pigmenting properties.

    “Magnetite, anhydrite and hematite were also near the detection limit, but magnetite is important for magnetic properties, anhydrite for sulfur contents, and hematite for pigmenting properties.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    MMS-2 is spiked with sulfates and other phases to resolve discrepancies in bulk chemistry, but its package composition confusingly lists both mineral percentages and wt.% oxides in the same table, summing them to 100%.

    “As noted above, the MMS-2 simulant is spiked with sulfates and other phases to resolve discrepancies in bulk chemistry, but the composition on the package confusingly lists both mineral percentages and wt.% oxides in the same table, summing them to 100%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8

    By starting with the correct mineral constituents, the derived properties should fall out of the final product, with adjustments made where necessary based on analyzing initial prototypes.

    “By starting with the correct mineral constituents, the derived properties (geotechnical, spectral, chemical, etc.) should fall out of the final product, with adjustments made where necessary based on analyzing initial prototypes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 5

    The Martian Garden's MMS-1 and MMS-2 do not resemble the original MMS; the company is mining the highly altered red cinder material described by Beegle et al. (2007) instead of the original Saddleback Basalt.

    “However, The Martian Garden company had no contact with the creators of MMS, and their simulants do not resemble the original version (compare Fig. 1d with Fig. 2 in Peters et al. (2008)). The company is instead mining the highly altered red cinder material described by Beegle et al. (2007) instead of the original Saddleback Basalt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al. (2008) source
    • cites Beegle et al. (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12

    Silicate minerals are likely shocked to various degrees on Mars, whereas the basic MGS-1 standard does not account for this.

    “As well, silicate minerals are likely shocked to various degrees on Mars, whereas the basic MGS-1 standard does not account for this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    Other Mars simulants have been developed based on terrestrial basalts, natural weathering profiles, and commercial sand products.

    “Other Mars simulants have also been developed based on terrestrial basalts, natural weathering profiles, and commercial sand products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    MGS-1 is a new open standard designed as a high-fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater.

    “Here, we describe the Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a new open standard designed as a high fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 5

    Quantitative mineralogical analysis is not available for JSC Mars-1, MMS, MMS-1, or MMS-2, although this is not really feasible for JSC Mars-1 due to its mostly amorphous character.

    “Quantitative mineralogical analysis is not available for either JSC Mars-1, MMS, MMS-1, or MMS-2, although this is not really feasible for JSC Mars-1 due to its mostly amorphous character.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1.0 Introduction · p. 3

    JSC Mars-1 was later reproduced as JSC Mars-1A by Orbitec when the original supply ran out.

    “The most prominent Mars simulant is Johnson Space Center JSC Mars-1 (Allen et al., 1998), which was later reproduced as JSC Mars-1A by Orbitec when the original supply ran out.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Allen et al., 1998
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 9

    The amorphous component of Rocknest is deficient in SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO, and enriched in SO3 and H2O compared to the bulk soil.

    “Dehouck et al. (2014) and Morris et al. (2015) isolated the elemental chemistry of the amorphous component using a mass balance approach (Table 2), showing that it is deficient in SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO, and enriched in SO3 and H2O compared to the bulk soil.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dehouck et al. (2014) source
    • cites Morris et al. (2015)
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1.0 Introduction · p. 3

    Mojave Mars (MMS) is not currently available outside of NASA.

    “The other notable Mars simulant is Mojave Mars (MMS) (Peters et al., 2008), that is not currently available outside of NASA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11

    The root MGS-1 standard does not include crystalline nitrate and perchlorate salts, although some initial prototypes designed for agricultural studies did include them.

    “We included crystalline nitrate and perchlorate salts in some of our initial prototypes designed for agricultural studies, but do not include them in the root MGS-1 standard.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7

    Martian soils have been examined in-situ at seven locations by landers and rovers, with supplemental information from orbital remote sensing.

    “Martian soils have been examined in-situ at seven locations by landers and rovers, with supplemental information from orbital remote sensing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.0 Introduction · p. 3

    Previous simulants often sacrificed accuracy for convenience, had poor documentation, and their resulting products have been assumed to be appropriate for all types of research.

    “Previous simulants often sacrificed accuracy for convenience, had poor documentation, and the resulting products have been assumed to be appropriate for all types of research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12

    Mars Global is not meant to be a perfect standard, and there are almost certainly trace mineral species present in martian soil that are not represented in MGS-1, including phosphates, sulfides, chromates, oxalates, and other rare species.

    “Mars Global is not meant to be a perfect standard for simulants (if such a thing exists), and there are almost certainly trace mineral species present in martian soil that aren't represented in MGS-1: these could include phosphates, sulfides, chromates, oxalates, and other rare species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6

    These other Mars simulants have not yet been widely distributed or adopted.

    “These simulants have not yet been widely distributed or adopted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8

    Simulants designed to match bulk chemistry might provide a close match to readily available measurements, but a simulant could be designed from infinite combinations of random compounds to reproduce the bulk chemistry of a reference material without having any of the right minerals inside it.

    “Simulants designed to match bulk chemistry might provide a close match to more readily available measurements (from Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer instruments, for example), but a simulant could be designed from infinite combinations of random compounds to reproduce the bulk chemistry of a reference material without having any of the right minerals inside of it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 24

    The plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine added separately in MGS-1 prototypes could also be added in the form of basalt or ultramafic rocks provided the mineral proportions are accurate.

    “While we have chosen to add the plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine separately in our prototypes, they could also be added in the form of basalt or ultramafic rocks provided the mineral proportions are accurate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12

    Additional phases may be present in an amorphous or poorly-crystalline state in martian soil.

    “Additional phases may be present in an amorphous or poorly-crystalline state, as discussed above.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17

    Soils at the Pathfinder landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.07-1.64 g/cm3.

    “soils at the Pathfinder landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.07-1.64/cm 3 (Moore et al., 1999)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moore et al., 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 5.1 Applications · p. 23

    The initial physical properties measurements in this study are limited.

    “As well, in the prototypes we did not control for detailed aspects like particle shape that can be important in influencing geotechnical properties, and our initial physical properties measurements in this study are limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 15

    The other phases in the MGS-1 standard are available in relatively pure forms from either natural sources or as synthetic chemical supplies.

    “The other phases in the MGS-1 standard are available in relatively pure forms from either natural sources or as synthetic chemical supplies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 21

    TGA data are not available for MMS-1 or MMS-2, but judging from their spectral properties these simulants have significant water contents, possibly on par with JSC Mars-1.

    “TGA data are not available for MMS-1 or MMS-2, but judging from their spectral properties (Fig. 4) these simulants have significant water contents, possibly on par with JSC Mars-1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19

    The observed spectral differences between MGS-1 and Mars may be caused by a combination of differences in crystal chemistry, specific amorphous compounds present on Mars, shock darkening, and ambient laboratory measurement conditions.

    “These observed differences may be caused by a combination of differences in crystal chemistry, the specific amorphous compounds present on Mars, shock darkening, as well as the fact that the simulant spectra were measured at ambient laboratory conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25

    Clay-rich Noachian regolith, or perchlorate and nitrate-bearing agricultural soils can be created by adding desired additional components to the root simulant.

    “For example, clay-rich Noachian regolith, or perchlorate and nitrate-bearing agricultural soils can be created by adding the desired additional components to the root simulant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 24

    In the past, simulant production has followed a predictable lifecycle: need arose, a NASA center or private company produced an initial large batch, then the batch ran out or interest faded and the simulant was discarded.

    “In the past, simulant production has followed a now predictable lifecycle: the need for a specific simulant arose, a NASA center or private company produced an initial large batch of the simulant, then eventually the batch ran out, or national interest in a given planetary body faded and the simulant was discarded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.1 Applications · p. 23

    The geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained compared to returned lunar regolith that has been studied extensively on Earth.

    “However, the geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained compared to returned lunar regolith that has been studied extensively on Earth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25

    NASA developed the concept of 'root' and 'branch' simulants for the Moon, where the root is a basic, well-characterized version of the simulant.

    “NASA developed the concept of 'root' and 'branch' simulants for the Moon, where the root is a basic, well-characterized version of the simulant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17

    Using more accurate Fe- and Ca-rich silicate compositions would result in higher densities for MGS-1 simulants.

    “Using more accurate Fe- and Ca-rich silicate compositions would result in higher densities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17

    Drift material at the Viking 1 landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.15±0.15 g/cm3.

    “drift material at the Viking 1 landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.15±0.15 g/cm 3 (Moore and Jakosky, 1989)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moore and Jakosky, 1989 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1 Source materials · p. 14

    Natural, high-purity sources of fayalitic olivine, pigeonite, and unweathered calcic plagioclase are rare on Earth, but efforts to source them in the future will greatly improve the bulk chemistry of the simulants.

    “Natural, high-purity sources of fayalitic olivine, pigeonite, and unweathered calcic plagioclase are rare on Earth, but efforts to source them in the future will greatly improve the bulk chemistry of the simulants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25

    There is no batch of MGS-1 to run out, but a general standard to follow.

    “In this way, there is no batch of MGS-1 to run out, but a general standard to follow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25

    A group at the Johnson Space Center is also developing a Rocknest-based version of the MMS simulant to be used for ISRU development.

    “Indeed, a group at the Johnson Space Center is also developing a Rocknest-based version of the MMS simulant to be used for ISRU development (Archer et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2018
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 46

    None of the spectra in Figure 4 have been offset or scaled.

    “None of the spectra have been offset or scaled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    MMS has recently been augmented further to achieve even more realistic volatile release patterns.

    “MMS has recently been augmented further to achieve even more realistic volatile release patterns (Archer et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2018
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    The significant and unrealistic water contents of JSC Mars-1 were cited as a motivating factor in developing the original MMS simulant.

    “The significant and unrealistic water contents of JSC Mars-1 were cited as a motivating factor in developing the original MMS simulant (Peters et al., 2008)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 42

    The prototype MGS-1 composition values in Table 2 are averages of 5 measurements.

    “Average of 5 measurements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    Allen et al. (1998) reported that JSC Mars-1 lost 21.1 wt.% (mostly water) when heated to 600 °C.

    “Allen et al. (1998) reported that JSC Mars-1 lost 21.1 wt.% (mostly water) when heated to 600 °C”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Allen et al. (1998)
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 15

    Sourcing a pre-existing, unweathered olivine-rich basalt or a combination of unweathered ultramafic rocks presents its own set of challenges and usually requires a large capital investment if the right material is not already being mined.

    “However, sourcing this kind of material presents its own set of challenges, and usually requires a large capital investment if the right material is not already being mined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 3.1 Source materials · p. 13

    Source minerals have been crushed into powders and analyzed by XRD, VNIR spectroscopy, and X-ray Fluorescence to verify their identity and detect any contaminants present.

    “These minerals have been crushed into powders and analyzed by XRD, VNIR spectroscopy, and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) to verify their identity and detect any contaminants present.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    The TEGA instrument did not detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site, but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.

    “The TEGA instrument did not a detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site (Smith et al., 2009), but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2009 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 3.3 Analyses · p. 15

    The prototype simulants were analyzed using a variety of imaging techniques and bulk analyses, and results were compared to relevant datasets from various orbital and in-situ spacecraft measurements as appropriate.

    “The prototype simulants were analyzed using a variety of imaging techniques and bulk analyses. Results from these analyses were compared to relevant datasets from various orbital and in-situ spacecraft measurements as appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 21

    The differences between the MGS-1 based simulant and Rocknest could be due to hygroscopicity in a humid terrestrial atmosphere, and the exact nature of the amorphous component in Rocknest is probably key to understanding the unique water release patterns measured by SAM.

    “The differences between the MGS-1 based simulant and Rocknest could be due to hygroscopicity in a humid terrestrial atmosphere, and the exact nature of the amorphous component in Rocknest is probably key to understanding the unique water release patterns measured by SAM (Archer et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer et al., 2018
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.1 Applications · p. 23

    Mojave Mars Simulant was developed specifically for geotechnical applications.

    “Mojave Mars Simulant was developed specifically for geotechnical applications (Peters et al. 2008)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al. 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25

    MGS-1 will benefit from the same root/branch scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by the authors or others.

    “MGS-1 will benefit from the same scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by us or others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20

    Peters et al. (2008) report that MMS lost 1.7 wt.% by 100 °C and 7.2 wt.% by 500 °C.

    “Peters et al. (2008) report that MMS lost 1.7 wt.% by 100 °C and 7.2 wt.% by 500 °C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al. (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6.0 Conclusions · p. 25

    Unlike previous simulants sourced from landscaping material, Mars Global is meant to be assembled ab initio from pure components to provide an accurate match to the mineralogy of martian regolith.

    “Unlike previous simulants sourced from landscaping material, Mars Global is meant to be assembled ab initio from pure components to provide an accurate match to the mineralogy of martian regolith.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
    • Rests on an assumption: The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.
75 of 75
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Simulants have usually been produced in large batches, and when the initial batch runs out it can be difficult to re-create the original material.

    “Perhaps more problematic is that simulants have usually been produced in large batches, and when the initial batch runs out it can be difficult to re-create the original material.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.

    “We developed a new standard for a Mars simulant, MGS-1 Mars Global Simulant, based on the Rocknest soil examined by the Curiosity rover.”
    “MGS-1 essentially means any simulant created based on the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars, as captured by the mineral recipe in Table 1.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.

    “MGS-1 essentially means any simulant created based on the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars, as captured by the mineral recipe in Table 1.”
    “MGS-1 will benefit from the same scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by us or others.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannon, K. M., Britt, D. T., Smith, T. M., Fritsche, R. F., & Batcheldor, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • Florida Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Cannon, Kevin M.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
317
Pages
470-478
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888719908
Cited by
243
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Icarus (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johnson Space Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Keywords
Gale Crater, open standards, bulk chemistry, spectral properties, volatile content, Mars sample return

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review