Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants
Abstract
Abstract The composition and physical properties of martian regolith are dramatically better understood compared to just a decade ago, particularly through the use of X-ray diffraction by the Curiosity rover. Because there are no samples of this regolith on Earth, researchers and engineers rely on terrestrial simulants to test future hardware and address fundamental science and engineering questions. Even with eventual sample return, the amount of material brought back would not be enough for bulk studies. Many existing Mars simulants were designed 10 or 20 years ago based on a more rudimentary understanding of martian surface materials. Here, we describe the Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a new open standard designed as a high fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater. We developed prototype simulants using the MGS-1 standard and characterized their basic physical properties, bulk chemistry, spectral properties, and volatile content. The MGS-1 based simulant compares favorably to rover and remote sensing observations from Mars, and offers dramatic improvements over past simulants in many areas. Modest amounts of simulant will be produced by the Center for Lunar & Asteroid Surface Science (CLASS) Exolith Lab to distribute to other researchers. By publishing the mineral recipe and production methods, we anticipate that other groups can re-create the simulant and modify it as they see fit, leading to a more sustainable model for simulant production and the possibility of extending the simulant for different regions on Mars or for different applications.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper introduces MGS-1, an open-standard mineralogical analog for global basaltic martian regolith based on the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater. Prototype simulants made to the MGS-1 recipe show favorable spectral, volatile, and physical-property comparisons to Mars observations and improve on older simulants such as JSC Mars-1 and MMS.
Key findings
- The MGS-1 standard is a mineral recipe with crystalline phases: plagioclase 29.4 wt.%, pyroxene 20.5 wt.%, olivine 16.2 wt.%, magnetite 1.5 wt.%, anhydrite 1.1 wt.%, hematite 0.8 wt.%; amorphous phases: basaltic glass 20.0 wt.%, Fe-sulfate 6.0 wt.%, ferrihydrite 2.7 wt.%, Fe-carbonate 1.9 wt.%.
- Prototype MGS-1 simulant had grain density 2.72 g/cm³, bulk density 1.23 g/cm³, and porosity 55%; TGA showed 3.4% mass loss below 300 °C and an additional 4.5% between 300 and 1000 °C.
- Calculated MGS-1 bulk chemistry was within ~2 wt.% of bulk Rocknest for all major oxide species, though prototype XRF measurements deviated most in CaO, FeO, and MgO due to the terrestrial silicate crystal chemistries used.
- MGS-1 spectra were similar to Rocknest Mastcam spectra from 400–1100 nm and to low-albedo OMEGA regions at longer wavelengths, but the simulant was brighter and had a weaker negative spectral slope >1000 nm; JSC Mars-1, MMS-1, and MMS-2 were not close matches to Rocknest or low-albedo OMEGA terrains.
Methods
- The standard was designed from mineralogy, using CheMin XRD constraints on crystalline Rocknest soil and inferences about the amorphous component, then re-normalized to a 30% amorphous content.
- Prototype simulants were produced by mixing plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, basaltic glass, magnetite, and hematite with water and sodium metasilicate pentahydrate in a 100:20:2 ratio, microwaving to form solid cobbles, grinding them, and mixing in water-soluble phases: iron(III) sulfate, ferrihydrite, anhydrite, and siderite.
- Characterization included SEM imaging, grain and bulk density measurements, XRF bulk chemistry, VNIR spectroscopy from 320–2550 nm, and TGA to 1000 °C at 30 °C/min; results were compared with Mars rover, orbital, and older simulant data.
Limitations
- The paper states MGS-1 is not a perfect standard: trace species such as phosphates, sulfides, chromates, and oxalates are not represented, shocked silicates are not accounted for, and the exact nature and amount of the amorphous component in martian soils remains uncertain.
- The authors state that terrestrial source minerals differ in crystal chemistry from Rocknest, affecting CaO, FeO, and MgO; XRF has difficulty measuring Na and S; TGA comparisons to Mars data require care because of different pressures, atmospheric compositions, and ramp rates.
- The paper states MGS-1 is not recommended for detailed geochemical studies such as aqueous alteration experiments, and that geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained, particle shape was not controlled, and initial physical-properties measurements were limited.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
25 of 60 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9
The detected crystalline phases in Rocknest include plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, magnetite, anhydrite, hematite, ilmenite, sanidine, and quartz.
“The detected crystalline phases in Rocknest include plagioclase, pyroxene, olivine, magnetite, anhydrite, hematite, ilmenite, sanidine, and quartz (Bish et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bish et al., 2013 source
- Premisecitation§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6
Martian soils are a subequal mixture of crystalline and amorphous phases, as revealed by the CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory.
“In contrast, martian soils are a subequal mixture of crystalline and amorphous phases, as revealed by the CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) (Bish et al., 2013; Dehouck et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bish et al., 2013 source
The “Amorphous or Poorly Ordered Components” section (page not specified) reports that CheMin found both crystalline and amorphous phases in Rocknest soil, but estimates the amorphous fraction at 27 wt%, leaving roughly 73 wt% crystalline—not a subequal mixture by the central estimates. The Discussion suggests the results may apply to other Martian soils, but does not establish the same proportions for Martian soils generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Dehouck et al., 2014 source
- Premisecitation§ 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9
The crystalline fraction of Rocknest is well constrained by X-ray diffraction.
“The crystalline fraction of Rocknest is well constrained by XRD (Bish et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bish et al., 2013 source
- Premisecitation§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 8
Rocknest is the best-characterized martian soil to date.
“Rocknest is the bestcharacterized martian soil to date (Bish et al., 2013; Blake et al., 2013; Leshin et al., 2013; Minitti et al., 2013; Archer et al., 2014; Sutter et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bish et al., 2013 source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports a rich inventory of crystalline and amorphous phases in Rocknest soil and says the XRD results provide critical ground-truth information. This supports Rocknest being well characterized mineralogically, but the paper does not establish that it is the best-characterized Martian soil overall or to date. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Blake et al., 2013 source
- cites Leshin et al., 2013 source
The opening Rocknest sampling passage and the Isotopes section document extensive analyses of Rocknest fines, including mineralogy, volatiles, and isotopes. They support that Rocknest was well characterized, but the paper does not compare the extent of its characterization with all other Martian soils or establish the 'best-characterized to date' superlative. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20
The SAM water release is consistent with the 1.5 wt.% water equivalent hydrogen in the upper layer of Rocknest materials measured by DAN.
“This is consistent with the 1.5 wt.% water equivalent hydrogen in the upper layer of Rocknest materials measured by DAN (Jun et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jun et al., 2013 source
- Premisecitation§ 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9
The MGS-1 standard adopts most of the same mineral proportions reported by Bish et al. (2013), re-normalized for a 30% amorphous content that is intermediate between low and high estimates of how much amorphous material is present.
“We adopt most of the same mineral proportions reported by Bish et al. (2013) (Table 1), re-normalized for a 30% amorphous content that is intermediate between low and high estimates of how much amorphous material is present (Bish et al., 2013; Dehouck et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19
At shorter wavelengths, the MGS-1 based simulant is similar in shape and albedo to Rocknest spectra acquired by Mastcam.
“At shorter wavelengths, the MGS-1 based simulant is similar in shape and albedo to the Rocknest spectra acquired by Mastcam (Wellington et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wellington et al., 2017 source
- Premisecitation§ 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8
The MGS-1 standard is based on X-ray diffraction analyses for the crystalline portion of the Rocknest soil and inferences for the amorphous component.
“We applied this mineral-based design philosophy for the MGS-1 standard, based on X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses for the crystalline portion of the Rocknest soil (Bish et al., 2013), and inferences for the amorphous component (Bish et al., 2013; Dehouck et al., 2014; Achilles et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
The characteristics of the MGS-1 based simulant compare favorably to rover- and remote sensing-based observations from Mars.
“We found the characteristics of the MGS-1 based simulant compare favorably to rover- and remote sensing-based observations from Mars, and offer dramatic improvements over past simulants in many areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.1 Source materials · p. 13
The crystal chemistry of the major silicates plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine differs between the prototype simulants and actual Rocknest measurements.
“The crystal chemistry of the major silicates (plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine) differs between the prototype simulants and actual Rocknest measurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
The MGS-1 based simulant offers dramatic improvements over past simulants in many areas.
“We found the characteristics of the MGS-1 based simulant compare favorably to rover- and remote sensing-based observations from Mars, and offer dramatic improvements over past simulants in many areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 2.2.4 Elemental chemistry · p. 12
The calculated estimated chemical composition for MGS-1 simulants using the mineral fractions and idealized chemical formulas results in an elemental chemistry within ~2 wt.% of bulk Rocknest for all major oxide species.
“This results in an elemental chemistry within ~2 wt.% of bulk Rocknest for all major oxide species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17
The grain density of the MGS-1 prototype simulant is 2.72 g/cm3.
“The grain (or particle) density of the prototype simulant is 2.72 g/cm 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19
All three other simulants (JSC Mars-1, MMS-1, MMS-2) have significant structure from 1900-2500 nm indicative of multiple different alteration phases present in significant amounts.
“All three of the other simulants have significant structure from 1900-2500 nm indicative of multiple different alteration phases present in significant amounts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 6.0 Conclusions · p. 25
The authors developed a new standard for a Mars simulant, MGS-1 Mars Global Simulant, based on the Rocknest soil examined by the Curiosity rover.
“We developed a new standard for a Mars simulant, MGS-1 Mars Global Simulant, based on the Rocknest soil examined by the Curiosity rover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
- Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19
JSC Mars-1, MMS-1 and MMS-2 are not close matches to Rocknest or low albedo terrains measured by OMEGA.
“The other Mars simulants measured, JSC Mars-1, MMS-1 and MMS-2, are not close matches to Rocknest or low albedo terrains measured by OMEGA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2 Bulk chemistry · p. 18
CaO, FeO and MgO are the elements most affected by deviations from Rocknest in MGS-1 prototypes.
“CaO, FeO and MgO are most affected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19
The absorptions and shoulders between 400 and 1100 nm are consistent between MGS-1 and Rocknest, associated with Fe2+-Fe3+ and FeO charge transfer, and Fe2+ crystal field splitting.
“In particular, the absorptions and shoulders are consistent between 400 and 1100 nm, associated with (1) Fe 2+ -Fe 3+ and FeO charge transfer, and (2) Fe 2+ crystal field splitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23
The MGS-1 synthesis method produces a 'regolith' of polymineralic grains with an adjustable particle size distribution, instead of simply mixing dry powders together.
“MGS-1 is appropriate for these cases because the synthesis method produces a 'regolith' of polymineralic grains with an adjustable particle size distribution, instead of simply mixing dry powders together.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.0 Results · p. 17
MGS-1 simulant grains are polymineralic.
“Fig. 3a shows a scanning electron micrograph of the simulant grains, where the polymineralic nature is clearly visible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.0 Results · p. 17
In MGS-1, ~μm-sized flecks of ferrihydrite and/or ferric sulfate are adsorbed onto the surface of larger silicate grains.
“Fig. 3b shows a closer view of the surface, where ~µm-sized flecks of ferrihydrite and/or ferric sulfate are adsorbed onto the surface of a larger silicate grain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.0 Results · p. 17
MGS-1 prototype simulant has a similar burnt umber color to Rocknest windblown soil.
“MGS-1 has a similar burnt umber color to Rocknest, mostly caused by the mixture of gray to black silicates and the ferrihydrite and hematite, which act as strong pigments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 45
The surface of a silicate grain in MGS-1 prototype is covered with adsorbed ferrihydrite and/or ferric sulfate.
“Zoomed in view of the surface of a silicate grain covered with adsorbed ferrihydrite and/or ferric sulfate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2 Bulk chemistry · p. 18
In the MGS-1 prototypes, there are deviations from Rocknest measurements due to the crystal chemistry of the silicate minerals used.
“As expected, there are deviations from the Rocknest measurements due to the crystal chemistry of the silicate minerals used in the prototypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19
At longer wavelengths, the MGS-1 simulant spectrum is similar to low albedo regions on Mars imaged by OMEGA.
“At longer wavelengths, the simulant spectrum is similar to low albedo regions on Mars imaged by the Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l'Eau, les Glaces, et l'Activité (OMEGA) orbital spectrometer (Milliken et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Milliken et al. 2007 source
- Findingown data§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20
The MGS-1 prototype simulant lost an additional 4.5% mass between 300 and 1000 °C.
“An additional 4.5% mass is lost between 300 and 1000 °C, which could include additional H2O, but is likely dominated by SO2 and CO2 from the breakdown of carbonates and sulfates in the simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17
The porosity of the MGS-1 prototype simulant is 55%.
“which gives a porosity of 55%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 45
MGS-1 prototype simulant grains are polymineralic, made up of multiple mineral constituents.
“Zoomed out view showing polymineralic particles made up of multiple mineral constituents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17
The bulk density of loosely deposited MGS-1 prototype simulant is 1.23 g/cm3.
“the bulk density for loosely deposited material is 1.23 g/cm 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20
The MGS-1 prototype simulant lost 3.4% relative mass at low temperatures (<300 °C).
“The simulant lost 3.4% relative mass at low temperatures (<300 °C), likely from physisorbed or weakly bound H2O.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3
The most cited martian simulants have seen their supplies exhausted.
“Simulants for martian regolith (informally, soil) are prone to these same issues, and the most cited martian simulants have seen their supplies exhausted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3
Past simulants, particularly lunar ones, have been plagued by a lack of quality control.
“However, past simulants (particularly lunar ones) have been plagued by a lack of quality control (Taylor et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al., 2016 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2.4 Elemental chemistry · p. 12
More effort put into sourcing accurate mineral chemistries, or combinations of endmembers, will result in a more accurate elemental chemistry for the final product.
“More effort put into sourcing accurate mineral chemistries (or combinations of endmembers) will result in a more accurate elemental chemistry for the final product.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8
Our general approach to designing asteroid and planetary simulants is to start from the mineralogy because minerals are the basic building blocks of planetary materials.
“Our general approach to designing asteroid and planetary simulants is to start from the mineralogy, because minerals are the basic building blocks of planetary materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9
The MGS-1 standard does not include ilmenite, sanidine or quartz, which were near the detection limits of CheMin.
“For simplicity and sourcing concerns we do not include ilmenite, sanidine or quartz in the MGS-1 standard, which were near the detection limits of CheMin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 8
Based on currently available data, Rocknest's chemical similarity to soils at disparate landing sites makes it an appropriate reference material from which to develop a new simulant standard.
“and based on currently available data its chemical similarity to soils at disparate landing sites makes it an appropriate reference material from which to develop a new simulant standard.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 5
There are a number of important differences between older Mars simulants and new in-situ measurements of martian regolith.
“There are a number of important differences between these older Mars simulants and new in-situ measurements of martian regolith.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3
JSC Mars-1A is no longer available.
“However, the Orbitec simulant website was taken down sometime in 2017 and it appears that JSC Mars-1A is no longer available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2.4 Elemental chemistry · p. 12
Actual MGS-1 based simulants will deviate from the calculated chemistry depending on the specific silicates used, because it can be difficult to find large quantities of terrestrial minerals with crystal chemistries appropriate for Mars.
“It can be difficult to find large quantities of terrestrial minerals with crystal chemistries appropriate for Mars, such that actual MGS-1 based simulants will deviate from the calculated chemistry depending on the specific silicates used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 9
Poorly crystalline and/or X-ray amorphous material makes up at least 21-22% of the Rocknest soil sample by weight.
“Poorly crystalline and/or X-ray amorphous material makes up at least 21-22% of the Rocknest soil sample by weight (Dehouck et al., 2014), and it is still not entirely clear what this material is.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehouck et al., 2014 source
- Premisenone given§ 5.0 Discussion · p. 21
Previous simulants used a natural, roughly basaltic terrestrial material that superficially matched Mars in terms of spectral or geotechnical properties.
“This is in contrast to previous simulants, where a natural, roughly basaltic terrestrial material was found that superficially matched Mars in terms of spectral or geotechnical properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.0 Discussion · p. 21
Simulants created using the MGS-1 standard are superior to previous martian simulants.
“Simulants created using the MGS-1 standard are superior to previous martian simulants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
- Interpretationown data§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20
The low-temperature mass loss of MGS-1 is likely from physisorbed or weakly bound H2O.
“The simulant lost 3.4% relative mass at low temperatures (<300 °C), likely from physisorbed or weakly bound H2O.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20
The additional mass loss between 300 and 1000 °C is likely dominated by SO2 and CO2 from breakdown of carbonates and sulfates in the simulant.
“An additional 4.5% mass is lost between 300 and 1000 °C, which could include additional H2O, but is likely dominated by SO2 and CO2 from the breakdown of carbonates and sulfates in the simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 10
For MGS-1, the amorphous component is represented by basaltic glass, ferric sulfate, ferrihydrite, and iron carbonate.
“For MGS-1 this includes basaltic glass, ferric sulfate, ferrihydrite, and iron carbonate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Applications · p. 24
It is cost-prohibitive to make extremely high fidelity regolith simulant in large quantities accessible to the community.
“In theory it is possible to create a small amount of extremely high fidelity regolith simulant that satisfies both mineral and chemical constraints simultaneously, but as described above it is cost-prohibitive to make this kind of simulant in large quantities accessible to the community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.0 Discussion · p. 21
The high fidelity of MGS-1 simulants is made possible by the mineralogy-based synthesis, where mostly pure, individual components are mixed together from scratch.
“The high fidelity of MGS-1 simulants is made possible by the mineralogy-based synthesis, where mostly pure, individual components are mixed together from scratch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
- Interpretationown data§ 4.0 Results · p. 17
The burnt umber color of MGS-1 is mostly caused by the mixture of gray to black silicates and ferrihydrite and hematite acting as strong pigments.
“MGS-1 has a similar burnt umber color to Rocknest, mostly caused by the mixture of gray to black silicates and the ferrihydrite and hematite, which act as strong pigments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23
In the prototypes, the authors did not control for detailed aspects like particle shape that can be important in influencing geotechnical properties.
“As well, in the prototypes we did not control for detailed aspects like particle shape that can be important in influencing geotechnical properties, and our initial physical properties measurements in this study are limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23
At this time, MGS-1 based simulants can likely be made to be as appropriate or more so for hardware testing compared to previous Mars simulants.
“Thus, at this time we can only say that MGS-1 based simulants can likely be made to be as appropriate or more so for hardware testing compared to previous Mars simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 14
If the mineral powders are simply mixed together dry, the resulting material will not accurately represent the properties of true martian regolith, which consists of polymineralic grains of eroded basalt mixed with secondary minerals.
“If the mineral powders are simply mixed together dry, the resulting material will not accurately represent the properties of true martian regolith, which consists of polymineralic grains of eroded basalt mixed with secondary minerals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 43
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 49
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 10Crystalline carbonates were not detected in Rocknest, but evolved gas analysis suggests that one or more carbonate-bearing phases is present.
“Crystalline carbonates were not detected in Rocknest, but evolved gas analysis suggests that one or more carbonate-bearing phases is present (Sutter et al., 2017), such that a mixture could be present, or the carbonates could be poorly crystalline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sutter et al., 2017 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11The detection of evolved ClO4 in Rocknest suggests that a mixture of (per)chlorate salts is likely present, or they are present as amorphous/adsorbed species.
“This suggests that a mixture of such salts is likely present, or they are present as amorphous/adsorbed species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2014 source
Section 3.3 (page unavailable) says evolved O₂ is consistent with decomposition of an oxychlorine salt such as perchlorate; it does not report detection of evolved ClO₄. Sections 3.1 and 3.2 favor Ca-perchlorate while leaving Mg-perchlorate possible, but do not conclude that a mixture is likely or that the salts occur as amorphous or adsorbed species. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11No crystalline (per)chlorate salts were detected in Rocknest above the ~1 wt.% detection limit, but evolved ClO4 was detected.
“No crystalline (per)chlorate salts were detected in Rocknest above the ~1 wt.% detection limit, but evolved ClO4 was detected (Archer et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2014 source
Section 3.1 (page unavailable) says CheMin did not detect a perchlorate salt in Rocknest and that estimated abundances were below its detection limits. Section 3.3 (page unavailable) reports evolved O₂ and chlorinated hydrocarbons consistent with perchlorate decomposition, not detection of evolved ClO₄. The cited passages also do not establish a ~1 wt.% detection limit for (per)chlorate salts. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7The soil itself has a basaltic composition, derived from a globally basaltic crust.
“The soil itself has a basaltic composition (Yen et al., 2005; Ming and Morris, 2017), derived from a globally basaltic crust (McSween et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11Oxychlorine species are present in martian soil and could include (per)chlorate salts and/or peroxide species; nitrates are also present.
“Oxychlorine species are also present in martian soil and could include (per)chlorate salts (Hecht et al., 2009; Sutter et al., 2017) and/or peroxide species (Clancy et al., 2004; Crandall et al., 2017). Nitrates are also present (Stern et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Source materials · p. 13Unit cell parameters for Rocknest minerals indicate ~An57 plagioclase, a mixture of augite and pigeonite, and ~Fo40 olivine.
“Unit cell parameters for Rocknest minerals indicate ~An57 plagioclase (Bish et al., 2013), a mixture of augite and pigeonite (Bish et al., 2013), and ~Fo40 olivine (Morris et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bish et al., 2013 source
- cites Morris et al., 2015
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants.
“The surface of Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by the combined action of impact comminution, physical erosion by wind, water, and lava, and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants (mostly early in the history of Mars) (McCauley, 1973; Malin and Edgett, 2000; Golombek and Bridges, 2000; Goetz et al., 2005; Yen et al., 2005; Murchie et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites McCauley, 1973 source
- cites Malin and Edgett, 2000 source
- cites Golombek and Bridges, 2000 source
The Martian Surface Layer discussion describes sand and dust on Mars and identifies impact, volcanic, and mechanical weathering as sources of sand; it also discusses wind erosion and evidence for a wetter past. It does not establish that Mars is covered by an unconsolidated regolith produced by all the listed processes, particularly erosion by lava and chemical weathering by fluids and oxidants. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6Most older simulant varieties contain almost no sulfur, whereas martian regolith contains up to 6 wt.% SO3, assuming all sulfur is in the form of sulfate.
“Most of the older simulant varieties contain almost no sulfur, whereas martian regolith contains up to 6 wt.% SO3 (assuming all S is in the form of sulfate; Yen et al., 2005; Ming and Morris, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Yen et al., 2005 source
- cites Ming and Morris, 2017
The Chemical Properties section (Table 1; page unavailable) reports 4.90 wt.% SO3 for average Martian soil, supporting the presence of sulfur at roughly the claimed level. But it also reports 7.42 wt.% for dust and a soil maximum of 35.06 wt.%, so 6 wt.% is not an upper limit. The cited paper does not address sulfur in older simulants or state the assumption that all sulfur is sulfate. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7Martian dust is somewhat chemically distinct from the underlying soil, with a larger component of nanophase iron oxides responsible for its ochre hue.
“Martian dust is somewhat chemically distinct from the underlying soil, with a larger component of npOx responsible for its ochre hue (Morris et al., 2001; Berger et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Morris et al., 2001 source
- cites Berger et al., 2016 source
The Results and Discussion report that Martian dust is compositionally similar to soil but enriched in Fe, S, and Cl; the Discussion also concludes that global dust is enriched in nanophase iron oxide (npOx). The cited paper does not say that npOx is responsible for the dust’s ochre hue. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7Soil major element chemistry and mineralogy are quite similar at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites, supporting the presence of a global basaltic soil.
“Soil major element chemistry and mineralogy are quite similar at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites (Yen et al., 2013; Ming and Morris, 2017), supporting the presence of a global basaltic soil that may be locally to regionally enriched in rarer evolved volcanic compositions (e.g., Christensen et al., 2005) or alteration phases (e.g., Squyres et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Yen et al., 2013
- cites Ming and Morris, 2017
The Chemical Properties section (page not supplied) says basaltic soil at the Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity landing sites has similar composition, supporting the claim about chemistry and a widespread basaltic soil. It also notes differences in local basaltic mineralogies; the Mineralogical Properties section describes minerals observed by the rovers but does not establish that mineralogy is quite similar across all three sites. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20The SAM instrument detected a broad H2O release in Rocknest starting at low temperatures, finding 2.0 ± 1.3 wt.% total evolved water averaged over four runs.
“the SAM instrument detected a broad H2O release in Rocknest starting at low temperatures, finding 2.0 ± 1.3 wt.% total evolved water averaged over four runs (Archer et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 46Mastcam data in Figure 4 were reproduced from Fig. 5 in Wellington et al. (2017).
“Mastcam data (filled circles) were reproduced from Fig. 5 in Wellington et al. (2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wellington et al. (2017) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 18Pike et al. (2011) reported that ~1 vol.% of Phoenix surface materials were <4 μm.
“Pike et al. (2011) reported that ~1 vol. % of the Phoenix surface materials were <4 µm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pike et al. (2011) source
The Approach and Results section describes a cumulative-volume particle-size distribution for Phoenix soil, and the Discussion reports less than 0.05% by volume below 2 µm. The passages do not give a volume fraction below 4 µm, so they do not establish the claimed ~1 vol.%. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 18Ming and Morris (2017) estimate that 15-25 wt.% of typical soils should consist of clay-sized grains due to chemical alteration.
“Ming and Morris (2017) estimate that due to chemical alteration, 15-25 wt.% of typical soils should consist of clay-sized grains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ming and Morris (2017)
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 42The calculated MGS-1 composition was weighted by the proportions in Table 1, with the actual crystal chemistries of martian silicates from Bish et al. (2013) and Morris et al. (2015).
“weighted by the proportions in Table 1, with the actual crystal chemistries of martian silicates from Bish et al. (2013) and Morris et al. (2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bish et al. (2013) source
- cites Morris et al. (2015)
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 14Upon heating and drying, sodium metasilicate forms a polymer network that acts as a binder, such that the resulting cobbles are solid and quite hard.
“Upon heating and drying, the sodium metasilicate forms a polymer network that acts as a binder, such that the resulting cobbles are solid and quite hard (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 11Ferric sulfate and iron carbonate can be synthesized in amorphous form by evaporating appropriate solutions in vacuum, but they are prone to recrystallize in normal laboratory conditions.
“These species can be synthesized in amorphous form by evaporating appropriate solutions in vacuum, but they are prone to recrystallize in normal laboratory conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5.1 Applications · p. 22JSC Mars-1 has virtually none of the same minerals as actual Mars soil, and its volatile content (>20 wt.% H2O) is highly unrealistic.
“JSC Mars-1 is not recommended for these applications because it has virtually none of the same minerals as actual Mars soil, and its volatile content (>20 wt.% H2O) is highly unrealistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19The negative spectral slope at wavelengths >1000 nm in remote data is not as strong in the MGS-1 simulant, and the simulant is brighter.
“However, the negative spectral slope at wavelengths >1000 nm in the remote data is not as strong in the simulant, and the simulant is brighter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19JSC Mars-1 has a significantly higher albedo than remote measurements, with strong H2O- and OH-related absorptions at 1400 and 1900 nm.
“JSC Mars-1 has a significantly higher albedo than the remote measurements, with strong H2O- and OHrelated absorptions at 1400 and 1900 nm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17The particle size distribution of simulants is highly adjustable through crushing and sieving.
“The particle size distribution of simulants is highly adjustable through crushing and sieving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.2 Bulk chemistry · p. 18SiO2, Al2O3, and SO3 in MGS-1 prototypes are much closer to Rocknest measured values and compare favorably to older martian simulants.
“Other elements such as SiO2, Al2O3, and SO3 are much closer to the measured values from Rocknest, and compare favorably to older martian simulants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19MMS-1 and MMS-2 have even higher albedos than JSC Mars-1, and at shorter wavelengths are dominated by the signature of hematite.
“The MMS-1 and MMS-2 simulants from The Martian Garden company have even higher albedos than JSC-Mars 1, and at shorter wavelengths are dominated by the signature of hematite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 41In the prototype simulants, crystalline siderite was added.
“In the prototype simulants we added crystalline siderite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 41In the prototype simulants, crystalline iron (III) sulfate pentahydrate was added.
“In the prototype simulants we added crystalline iron (III) sulfate pentahydrate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23There are apparent changes between MMS and MMS-1/2.
“Again, due to apparent changes between MMS and MMS-1/2, we do not recommend these simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 4The utility of JSC Mars-1, MMS, and their updated versions comes mostly from being fine-grained, roughly basaltic composition materials; this may be appropriate for certain uses that do not require high fidelity simulants, but inappropriate for others.
“The utility of these simulants (JSC Mars-1, MMS, and their updated versions) comes mostly from the fact that they are fine-grained, roughly basaltic composition materials: this may be appropriate for certain uses that do not require high fidelity simulants, but inappropriate for others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6JSC Mars-1 is extremely hygroscopic, contains >20 wt.% H2O at ambient conditions, and is known to contain significant amounts of organic matter.
“JSC Mars-1 is extremely hygroscopic, contains >20 wt.% H2O at ambient conditions, and is known to contain significant amounts of organic matter as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2.1 Crystalline fraction · p. 9Magnetite, anhydrite and hematite were near the detection limit, but magnetite is important for magnetic properties, anhydrite for sulfur contents, and hematite for pigmenting properties.
“Magnetite, anhydrite and hematite were also near the detection limit, but magnetite is important for magnetic properties, anhydrite for sulfur contents, and hematite for pigmenting properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6MMS-2 is spiked with sulfates and other phases to resolve discrepancies in bulk chemistry, but its package composition confusingly lists both mineral percentages and wt.% oxides in the same table, summing them to 100%.
“As noted above, the MMS-2 simulant is spiked with sulfates and other phases to resolve discrepancies in bulk chemistry, but the composition on the package confusingly lists both mineral percentages and wt.% oxides in the same table, summing them to 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8By starting with the correct mineral constituents, the derived properties should fall out of the final product, with adjustments made where necessary based on analyzing initial prototypes.
“By starting with the correct mineral constituents, the derived properties (geotechnical, spectral, chemical, etc.) should fall out of the final product, with adjustments made where necessary based on analyzing initial prototypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 5The Martian Garden's MMS-1 and MMS-2 do not resemble the original MMS; the company is mining the highly altered red cinder material described by Beegle et al. (2007) instead of the original Saddleback Basalt.
“However, The Martian Garden company had no contact with the creators of MMS, and their simulants do not resemble the original version (compare Fig. 1d with Fig. 2 in Peters et al. (2008)). The company is instead mining the highly altered red cinder material described by Beegle et al. (2007) instead of the original Saddleback Basalt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peters et al. (2008) source
- cites Beegle et al. (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12Silicate minerals are likely shocked to various degrees on Mars, whereas the basic MGS-1 standard does not account for this.
“As well, silicate minerals are likely shocked to various degrees on Mars, whereas the basic MGS-1 standard does not account for this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6Other Mars simulants have been developed based on terrestrial basalts, natural weathering profiles, and commercial sand products.
“Other Mars simulants have also been developed based on terrestrial basalts, natural weathering profiles, and commercial sand products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Abstract · p. 2MGS-1 is a new open standard designed as a high-fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater.
“Here, we describe the Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a new open standard designed as a high fidelity mineralogical analog to global basaltic regolith on Mars, as represented by the Rocknest windblown deposit at Gale crater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 5Quantitative mineralogical analysis is not available for JSC Mars-1, MMS, MMS-1, or MMS-2, although this is not really feasible for JSC Mars-1 due to its mostly amorphous character.
“Quantitative mineralogical analysis is not available for either JSC Mars-1, MMS, MMS-1, or MMS-2, although this is not really feasible for JSC Mars-1 due to its mostly amorphous character.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3JSC Mars-1 was later reproduced as JSC Mars-1A by Orbitec when the original supply ran out.
“The most prominent Mars simulant is Johnson Space Center JSC Mars-1 (Allen et al., 1998), which was later reproduced as JSC Mars-1A by Orbitec when the original supply ran out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 1998
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2.2 Amorphous fraction · p. 9The amorphous component of Rocknest is deficient in SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO, and enriched in SO3 and H2O compared to the bulk soil.
“Dehouck et al. (2014) and Morris et al. (2015) isolated the elemental chemistry of the amorphous component using a mass balance approach (Table 2), showing that it is deficient in SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO, and enriched in SO3 and H2O compared to the bulk soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dehouck et al. (2014) source
- cites Morris et al. (2015)
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3Mojave Mars (MMS) is not currently available outside of NASA.
“The other notable Mars simulant is Mojave Mars (MMS) (Peters et al., 2008), that is not currently available outside of NASA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al., 2008 source
May combine two claims.
Premiseown data§ 2.2.3 Oxychlorines and nitrates · p. 11The root MGS-1 standard does not include crystalline nitrate and perchlorate salts, although some initial prototypes designed for agricultural studies did include them.
“We included crystalline nitrate and perchlorate salts in some of our initial prototypes designed for agricultural studies, but do not include them in the root MGS-1 standard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1.2 New insights on martian regolith · p. 7Martian soils have been examined in-situ at seven locations by landers and rovers, with supplemental information from orbital remote sensing.
“Martian soils have been examined in-situ at seven locations by landers and rovers, with supplemental information from orbital remote sensing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.0 Introduction · p. 3Previous simulants often sacrificed accuracy for convenience, had poor documentation, and their resulting products have been assumed to be appropriate for all types of research.
“Previous simulants often sacrificed accuracy for convenience, had poor documentation, and the resulting products have been assumed to be appropriate for all types of research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12Mars Global is not meant to be a perfect standard, and there are almost certainly trace mineral species present in martian soil that are not represented in MGS-1, including phosphates, sulfides, chromates, oxalates, and other rare species.
“Mars Global is not meant to be a perfect standard for simulants (if such a thing exists), and there are almost certainly trace mineral species present in martian soil that aren't represented in MGS-1: these could include phosphates, sulfides, chromates, oxalates, and other rare species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1.1 Previous Mars simulants · p. 6These other Mars simulants have not yet been widely distributed or adopted.
“These simulants have not yet been widely distributed or adopted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2.1 Design philosophy · p. 8Simulants designed to match bulk chemistry might provide a close match to readily available measurements, but a simulant could be designed from infinite combinations of random compounds to reproduce the bulk chemistry of a reference material without having any of the right minerals inside it.
“Simulants designed to match bulk chemistry might provide a close match to more readily available measurements (from Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer instruments, for example), but a simulant could be designed from infinite combinations of random compounds to reproduce the bulk chemistry of a reference material without having any of the right minerals inside of it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 24The plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine added separately in MGS-1 prototypes could also be added in the form of basalt or ultramafic rocks provided the mineral proportions are accurate.
“While we have chosen to add the plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine separately in our prototypes, they could also be added in the form of basalt or ultramafic rocks provided the mineral proportions are accurate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2.5 Additional considerations · p. 12Additional phases may be present in an amorphous or poorly-crystalline state in martian soil.
“Additional phases may be present in an amorphous or poorly-crystalline state, as discussed above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17Soils at the Pathfinder landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.07-1.64 g/cm3.
“soils at the Pathfinder landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.07-1.64/cm 3 (Moore et al., 1999)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore et al., 1999 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23The initial physical properties measurements in this study are limited.
“As well, in the prototypes we did not control for detailed aspects like particle shape that can be important in influencing geotechnical properties, and our initial physical properties measurements in this study are limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 15The other phases in the MGS-1 standard are available in relatively pure forms from either natural sources or as synthetic chemical supplies.
“The other phases in the MGS-1 standard are available in relatively pure forms from either natural sources or as synthetic chemical supplies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 21TGA data are not available for MMS-1 or MMS-2, but judging from their spectral properties these simulants have significant water contents, possibly on par with JSC Mars-1.
“TGA data are not available for MMS-1 or MMS-2, but judging from their spectral properties (Fig. 4) these simulants have significant water contents, possibly on par with JSC Mars-1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 Spectral properties · p. 19The observed spectral differences between MGS-1 and Mars may be caused by a combination of differences in crystal chemistry, specific amorphous compounds present on Mars, shock darkening, and ambient laboratory measurement conditions.
“These observed differences may be caused by a combination of differences in crystal chemistry, the specific amorphous compounds present on Mars, shock darkening, as well as the fact that the simulant spectra were measured at ambient laboratory conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25Clay-rich Noachian regolith, or perchlorate and nitrate-bearing agricultural soils can be created by adding desired additional components to the root simulant.
“For example, clay-rich Noachian regolith, or perchlorate and nitrate-bearing agricultural soils can be created by adding the desired additional components to the root simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 24In the past, simulant production has followed a predictable lifecycle: need arose, a NASA center or private company produced an initial large batch, then the batch ran out or interest faded and the simulant was discarded.
“In the past, simulant production has followed a now predictable lifecycle: the need for a specific simulant arose, a NASA center or private company produced an initial large batch of the simulant, then eventually the batch ran out, or national interest in a given planetary body faded and the simulant was discarded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23The geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained compared to returned lunar regolith that has been studied extensively on Earth.
“However, the geotechnical properties of actual martian regolith are poorly constrained compared to returned lunar regolith that has been studied extensively on Earth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25NASA developed the concept of 'root' and 'branch' simulants for the Moon, where the root is a basic, well-characterized version of the simulant.
“NASA developed the concept of 'root' and 'branch' simulants for the Moon, where the root is a basic, well-characterized version of the simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17Using more accurate Fe- and Ca-rich silicate compositions would result in higher densities for MGS-1 simulants.
“Using more accurate Fe- and Ca-rich silicate compositions would result in higher densities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Physical properties · p. 17Drift material at the Viking 1 landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.15±0.15 g/cm3.
“drift material at the Viking 1 landing site had an estimated bulk density of 1.15±0.15 g/cm 3 (Moore and Jakosky, 1989)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore and Jakosky, 1989 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1 Source materials · p. 14Natural, high-purity sources of fayalitic olivine, pigeonite, and unweathered calcic plagioclase are rare on Earth, but efforts to source them in the future will greatly improve the bulk chemistry of the simulants.
“Natural, high-purity sources of fayalitic olivine, pigeonite, and unweathered calcic plagioclase are rare on Earth, but efforts to source them in the future will greatly improve the bulk chemistry of the simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25There is no batch of MGS-1 to run out, but a general standard to follow.
“In this way, there is no batch of MGS-1 to run out, but a general standard to follow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25A group at the Johnson Space Center is also developing a Rocknest-based version of the MMS simulant to be used for ISRU development.
“Indeed, a group at the Johnson Space Center is also developing a Rocknest-based version of the MMS simulant to be used for ISRU development (Archer et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2018
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 46None of the spectra in Figure 4 have been offset or scaled.
“None of the spectra have been offset or scaled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20MMS has recently been augmented further to achieve even more realistic volatile release patterns.
“MMS has recently been augmented further to achieve even more realistic volatile release patterns (Archer et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2018
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20The significant and unrealistic water contents of JSC Mars-1 were cited as a motivating factor in developing the original MMS simulant.
“The significant and unrealistic water contents of JSC Mars-1 were cited as a motivating factor in developing the original MMS simulant (Peters et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al., 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown data§ Table 1. Mineral recipe for the MGS-1 standard. 910 911 · p. 42The prototype MGS-1 composition values in Table 2 are averages of 5 measurements.
“Average of 5 measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20Allen et al. (1998) reported that JSC Mars-1 lost 21.1 wt.% (mostly water) when heated to 600 °C.
“Allen et al. (1998) reported that JSC Mars-1 lost 21.1 wt.% (mostly water) when heated to 600 °C”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al. (1998)
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 3.2 Simulant preparation · p. 15Sourcing a pre-existing, unweathered olivine-rich basalt or a combination of unweathered ultramafic rocks presents its own set of challenges and usually requires a large capital investment if the right material is not already being mined.
“However, sourcing this kind of material presents its own set of challenges, and usually requires a large capital investment if the right material is not already being mined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3.1 Source materials · p. 13Source minerals have been crushed into powders and analyzed by XRD, VNIR spectroscopy, and X-ray Fluorescence to verify their identity and detect any contaminants present.
“These minerals have been crushed into powders and analyzed by XRD, VNIR spectroscopy, and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) to verify their identity and detect any contaminants present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20The TEGA instrument did not detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site, but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.
“The TEGA instrument did not a detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site (Smith et al., 2009), but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al., 2009 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3.3 Analyses · p. 15The prototype simulants were analyzed using a variety of imaging techniques and bulk analyses, and results were compared to relevant datasets from various orbital and in-situ spacecraft measurements as appropriate.
“The prototype simulants were analyzed using a variety of imaging techniques and bulk analyses. Results from these analyses were compared to relevant datasets from various orbital and in-situ spacecraft measurements as appropriate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 21The differences between the MGS-1 based simulant and Rocknest could be due to hygroscopicity in a humid terrestrial atmosphere, and the exact nature of the amorphous component in Rocknest is probably key to understanding the unique water release patterns measured by SAM.
“The differences between the MGS-1 based simulant and Rocknest could be due to hygroscopicity in a humid terrestrial atmosphere, and the exact nature of the amorphous component in Rocknest is probably key to understanding the unique water release patterns measured by SAM (Archer et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer et al., 2018
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.1 Applications · p. 23Mojave Mars Simulant was developed specifically for geotechnical applications.
“Mojave Mars Simulant was developed specifically for geotechnical applications (Peters et al. 2008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al. 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Availability and future development of MGS-1 · p. 25MGS-1 will benefit from the same root/branch scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by the authors or others.
“MGS-1 will benefit from the same scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by us or others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Thermogravimetric analysis · p. 20Peters et al. (2008) report that MMS lost 1.7 wt.% by 100 °C and 7.2 wt.% by 500 °C.
“Peters et al. (2008) report that MMS lost 1.7 wt.% by 100 °C and 7.2 wt.% by 500 °C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al. (2008) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 6.0 Conclusions · p. 25Unlike previous simulants sourced from landscaping material, Mars Global is meant to be assembled ab initio from pure components to provide an accurate match to the mineralogy of martian regolith.
“Unlike previous simulants sourced from landscaping material, Mars Global is meant to be assembled ab initio from pure components to provide an accurate match to the mineralogy of martian regolith.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
- Rests on an assumption: The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.
The paper relies on this without support.
Simulants have usually been produced in large batches, and when the initial batch runs out it can be difficult to re-create the original material.
“Perhaps more problematic is that simulants have usually been produced in large batches, and when the initial batch runs out it can be difficult to re-create the original material.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rocknest windblown soil is representative of average basaltic martian regolith for the purpose of defining a global Mars simulant standard.
“We developed a new standard for a Mars simulant, MGS-1 Mars Global Simulant, based on the Rocknest soil examined by the Curiosity rover.”
“MGS-1 essentially means any simulant created based on the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars, as captured by the mineral recipe in Table 1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mineral recipe in Table 1 accurately represents the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars.
“MGS-1 essentially means any simulant created based on the mineralogy of average basaltic regolith on Mars, as captured by the mineral recipe in Table 1.”
“MGS-1 will benefit from the same scheme, where the recipe in Table 1 forms the basic root, and various branches can be created either by us or others.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Mars surface is composed primarily of mafic rocks, usually basalts.
“The Mars surface is composed primarily of mafic rocks, usually basalts [28,29,30,31]”
From Mars Regolith Simulant Ameliorated by Compost as in situ Cultivation Substrate Improves Lettuce Growth and Nutritional Aspects (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of martian soil at the phoenix lander site
Hecht, M. H., Kounaves, S. P., Quinn, R. C., West, S. J., Young, S. M. M., Ming, D. W., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Boynton, W. V., Hoffman, J., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172466 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for early martian climate
The Omega Team, Poulet, F., Bibring, J. P., Mustard, J. F., Gendrin, A., Mangold, N., Langevin, Y., Arvidson, R. E., Gondet, B., & Cécile Gomez, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04274 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Sedimentary rocks of early Mars
Malin, M. C., & Edgett, K. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1927 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Murchie, S. L., Mustard, J. F., Ehlmann, B. L., Milliken, R. E., Bishop, J. L., McKeown, N. K., Dobrea, E. Z. N., Seelos, F. P., Buczkowski, D. L., Wiseman, S. M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009je003342 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
H <sub>2</sub> O at the Phoenix Landing Site
Smith, P. H., Tamppari, L. K., Arvidson, R. E., Bass, D., Blaney, D., Boynton, W. V., Carswell, A., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Duck, T., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172339 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 18th lunar and planetary science conference
Kissin, S. A. (1988) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90170-6 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Elemental composition of the martian crust
McSween, H. Y., Taylor, G. J., & Wyatt, M. B. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165871 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Chloride-Bearing Materials in the Southern Highlands of Mars
Osterloo, M. M., Hamilton, V. E., Bandfield, J. L., Glotch, T. D., Baldridge, A. M., Christensen, P. R., Tornabene, L. L., & Anderson, F. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150690 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Volatile, isotope, and organic analysis of Martian fines with the Mars Curiosity Rover
Leshin, L. A., Mahaffy, P. R., Webster, C. R., Cabane, M., Coll, P., Conrad, P. G., Archer, P. D., Atreya, S. K., Brunner, A. E., Buch, A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238937 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Detection of Silica-Rich Deposits on Mars
Squyres, S. W., Arvidson, R. E., Ruff, S. W., Gellert, R., Morris, R. V., Ming, D. W., Crumpler, L. S., Farmer, J. D., Marais, D. J. D., Yen, A. S., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155429 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Planetary crusts: their composition, origin and evolution
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-6776 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
An integrated view of the chemistry and mineralogy of martian soils
Yen, A. S., Gellert, R., Schröder, C., Morris, R. V., Bell, J. F., Knudson, A. T., Clark, B. C., Ming, D. W., Crisp, J. A., Arvidson, R. E., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03637 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
X-ray diffraction results from Mars science laboratory: mineralogy of rocknest at Gale Crater
Bish, D. L., Blake, D. F., Vaniman, D. T., Chipera, S. J., Morris, R. V., Ming, D. W., Treiman, A. H., Sarrazin, P., Morrison, S. M., Downs, R. T., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238932 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Physical properties of the particles composing the Martian dust storm of 1971–1972
Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., & Sagan, C. (1977) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(77)90088-4 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Curiosity at Gale Crater, Mars: Characterization and Analysis of the Rocknest Sand Shadow
Blake, D. F., Morris, R. V., Kocurek, G., Morrison, S. M., Downs, R. T., Bish, D., Ming, D. W., Edgett, K. S., Rubin, D., Goetz, W., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239505 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Stroncik, N. A., & Schmincke, H. (2002) · International Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00531-001-0238-7 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Mojave Mars Simulant-Characterization of a New Geologic Mars Analog
Peters, G. H., Abbey, W., Bearman, G. H., Mungas, G. S., Smith, J. A., Anderson, R. C., Douglas, S., & Beegle, L. W. (2008) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.004 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Sutter, B., McAdam, A. C., Mahaffy, P. R., Ming, D. W., Edgett, K. S., Rampe, E. B., Eigenbrode, J. L., Franz, H. B., Freissinet, C., Grotzinger, J. P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2016je005225 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Stern, J. C., Sutter, B., Freissinet, C., Navarro-González, R., McKay, C. P., Archer, P. D., Buch, A., Brunner, A. E., Coll, P., Eigenbrode, J. L., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420932112 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Evidence for magmatic evolution and diversity on Mars from infrared observations
Christensen, P. R., McSWEEN, H. Y., Jr., Bandfield, J. L., Ruff, S. W., Rogers, A. D., Hamilton, V. E., Gorelick, N., Wyatt, M. B., JAKOSKY, B. M., Kieffer, H. H., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03639 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
The Opposition Effect and Negative Polarization of Structural Analogs for Planetary Regoliths
Shkuratov, Y. G., Ovcharenko, A. P., Zubko, E., Miloslavskaya, O. V., Muinonen, K., Piironen, J., Nelson, R., Smythe, W. D., Rosenbush, V. K., & Helfenstein, P. (2002) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6923 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Can Plants Grow on Mars and the Moon: A Growth Experiment on Mars and Moon Soil Simulants
Wamelink, G. W. W., Frissel, J. Y., Krijnen, W. H. J., Verwoert, M. R., & Goedhart, P. W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103138 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Golombek, M. P., & Bridges, N. T. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1999je001043 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Mariner 9 evidence for wind erosion in the equatorial and mid-latitude regions of Mars
McCauley, J. F. (1973) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb078i020p04123 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Evaluations of lunar regolith simulants
Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M., & Britt, D. (2016) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2016.04.005 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil-like deposits observed by Sojourner, the Pathfinder rover
Moore, H. J., Bickler, D. B., Crisp, J. A., Eisen, H. J., Gensler, J. A., Haldemann, A. F. C., Matijevic, J. R., Reid, L. K., & Pavlics, F. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1998je900005 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Mineralogy of an active eolian sediment from the Namib dune, Gale crater, Mars
Achilles, C. N., Downs, R. T., Ming, D. W., Rampe, E. B., Morris, R. V., Treiman, A. H., Morrison, S. M., Blake, D. F., Vaniman, D. T., Ewing, R. C., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2017je005262 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
A measurement of the 362 GHz absorption line of Mars atmospheric H2O2
Clancy, R. T., Sandor, B. J., & Moriarty-Schieven, G. H. (2004) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.003 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Perchlorate on Mars: a chemical hazard and a resource for humans
Davila, A. F., Willson, D., Coates, J. D., & McKay, C. P. (2013) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550413000189 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Moore, H. J., & Jakosky, B. M. (1989) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90132-2 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
A global Mars dust composition refined by the alpha-particle X-ray spectrometer in Gale Crater
Berger, J. A., Schmidt, M. E., Gellert, R., Campbell, J. L., King, P. L., Flemming, R. L., Ming, D. W., Clark, B. C., Pradler, I., VanBommel, S. J. V., et al. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2015gl066675 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Indication of drier periods on Mars from the chemistry and mineralogy of atmospheric dust
Goetz, W., Bertelsen, P., Binau, C. S., Gunnlaugsson, H. P., Hviid, S. F., Kinch, K. M., Madsen, D. E., Madsen, M. B., Olsen, M., Gellert, R., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03807 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Results from the Mars Phoenix Lander Robotic Arm experiment
Arvidson, R. E., Bonitz, R. G., Robinson, M., Carsten, J. L., Volpe, R. A., Trebi‐Ollennu, A., Mellon, M. T., Chu, P. C., Davis, K., Wilson, J. J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009je003408 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
JSC MARS-1: A Martian Soil Simulant
Allen, C. C., Jager, K. M., Morris, R. V., Lindstrom, D. J., Lindstrom, M. M., & Lockwood, J. P. (1998) · doi:10.1061/40339(206)54 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Morris, R. V., Golden, D. C., Bell, J. F., III, Lauer, H. V., & Adams, J. B. (1993) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(93)90185-y · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Milliken, R. E., Mustard, J. F., Poulet, F., Jouglet, D., Bibring, J., Gondet, B., & Langevin, Y. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2006je002853 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Morris, R. V., Golden, D. C., Ming, D. W., Shelfer, T. D., Jørgensen, L. C., Bell, J. F., Graff, T. G., & Mertzman, S. A. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2000je001328 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Widespread weathered glass on the surface of Mars
Horgan, B. H. N., & Bell, J. F., III (2012) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g32755.1 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
de Vera, J.-P., Horneck, G., Rettberg, P., & Ott, S. (2004) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.10.035 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Archer, P. D., Franz, H. B., Sutter, B., Arevalo, R. D., Coll, P., Eigenbrode, J. L., Glavin, D. P., Jones, J. J., Leshin, L. A., Mahaffy, P. R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2013je004493 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Thermally altered palagonitic tephra: A spectral and process analog to the soil and dust of Mars
Bell, J. F., III, Morris, R. V., & Adams, J. B. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/92je02367 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Dehouck, E., McLennan, S. M., Meslin, P., & Cousin, A. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2014je004716 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Goetz, W., Pike, W. T., Hviid, S. F., Madsen, M. B., Morris, R. V., Hecht, M. H., Staufer, U., Leer, K., Sykulska, H., Hemmig, E., et al. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009je003437 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Pike, W. T., Staufer, U., Hecht, M. H., Goetz, W., Parrat, D., Sykulska-Lawrence, H., Vijendran, S., & Madsen, M. B. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2011gl049896 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
(1998) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Reaching 1 m Deep on Mars: The Icebreaker Drill
Zacny, K. A., Paulsen, G. L., McKay, C. P., Glass, B., Dave, A. J., Dávila, A. F., Marinova, M. M., Mellerowicz, B., Heldmann, J. L., Stoker, C. R., et al. (2013) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2013.1038 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
McAdam, A. C., Franz, H. B., Sutter, B., Archer, P. D., Freissinet, C., Eigenbrode, J. L., Ming, D. W., Atreya, S. K., Bish, D. L., Blake, D. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2013je004518 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The potassic sedimentary rocks in Gale Crater, Mars, as seen by ChemCam on board Curiosity
Deit, L. L., Mangold, N., Forni, O., Cousin, A., Lasue, J., Schröder, S., Wiens, R. C., Sumner, D. Y., Fabre, C., Stack, K. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2015je004987 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
MAHLI at the Rocknest sand shadow: Science and science‐enabling activities
Minitti, M. E., Kah, L. C., Yingst, R. A., Edgett, K. S., Anderson, R. C., Beegle, L. W., Carsten, J. L., Deen, R., Goetz, W., Hardgrove, C. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2013je004426 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Experimental Studies on Mechanics of Lunar Excavation
Bernold, L. E. (1991) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(1991)4:1(9 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
JMSS-1: a new Martian soil simulant
Zeng, X., Li, X., Wang, S., Li, S., Spring, N., Tang, H., Li, Y., & Feng, J. (2015) · Earth, Planets and Space · doi:10.1186/s40623-015-0248-5 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The Shawmere anorthosite and OB-1 as lunar highland regolith simulants
Battler, M. M., & SPRAY, J. G. (2009) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Elrod, M. K., Bougher, S. W., Bell, J. M., Mahaffy, P. R., Benna, M., Stone, S. W., Yelle, R. V., & JAKOSKY, B. M. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · doi:10.1002/2016ja023482 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Schuerger, A. C., Golden, D. C., & Ming, D. W. (2012) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2012.07.026 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Sulfates hydrating bulk soil in the Martian low and middle latitudes
Karunatillake, S., Wray, J. J., Gasnault, O., McLennan, S. M., Rogers, A. D., Squyres, S. W., Boynton, W. V., Skok, J. R., Ojha, L., & Olsen, N. F. (2014) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2014gl061136 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
EVANS, D. L., & Adams, J. B. (1979) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Cannon, K. M., Mustard, J. F., Parman, S. W., Sklute, E. C., Dyar, M. D., & Cooper, R. F. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2016je005219 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationWellington, D. F., Bell, J. F., Johnson, J. R., Kinch, K. M., Rice, M. S., Godber, A., Ehlmann, B. L., Fraeman, A. A., Hardgrove, C., & the MSL Science Team (2017) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am-2017-5760ccby · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Preserved glass-rich impactites on Mars
Cannon, K. M., & Mustard, J. F. (2015) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g36953.1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationDehouck, E., McLennan, S. M., Sklute, E. C., & Dyar, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2016je005222 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Development of a Martian Regolith Simulant for In-Situ Resource Utilization Testing
Scott, A. N., Oze, C., Tang, Y., & O’Loughlin, A. (2017) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.024 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Morphological, structural, and spectral characteristics of amorphous iron sulfates
Sklute, E. C., Jensen, H. B., Rogers, A. D., & Reeder, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2014je004784 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Soil simulant sourcing for the ExoMars rover testbed
Gouache, T. P., Patel, N., Brunskill, C., Scott, G. P., Saaj, C. M., Matthews, M., & Cui, L. (2011) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.03.006 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Lunar Regolith Simulant User's Guide
Schrader, C. M., Rickman, A. D. L., McLemore, C., & Fikes, J. (2010) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Jun, I., Mitrofanov, I., Litvak, M. L., Sanin, A. B., Kim, W., Behar, A., Boynton, W. V., DeFlores, L., Fedosov, F., Golovin, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2013je004510 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
(2013) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rampe, E. B., Morris, R. V., Archer, P. D., Agresti, D. G., & Ming, D. W. (2016) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am-2016-5408ccbyncnd · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Salten Skov I: A Martian magnetic dust analogue
Nørnberg, P., Gunnlaugsson, H. P., Merrison, J. P., & Vendelboe, A. L. (2008) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2008.08.017 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Cannon, K. M., Mustard, J. F., & Agee, C. B. (2015) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.016 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation(2007) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Horgan, B. H. N., Smith, R. J., Cloutis, E. A., Mann, P. J., & Christensen, P. R. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2016je005111 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Crandall, P. B., Góbi, S., Gillis‐Davis, J. J., & Kaiser, R. I. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2017je005329 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
(2017) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 20 · see citing works
(2015) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 17 · see citing works
(2018) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 11 · see citing works
(2018) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Goetz, W., Pike, W. T., Hviid, S. F., Madsen, M. B., Morris, R. V., Hecht, M. H., Staufer, U., Leer, K., Sykulska, H., Hemmig, E., et al. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2010je003717
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duri, L. G., Caporale, A. G., Rouphael, Y., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.747821 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
A review towards the design of extraterrestrial structures: From regolith to human outposts
Kalapodis, N. A., Kampas, G., & Ktenidou, O. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.038 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Challenging the agricultural viability of martian regolith simulants
Eichler, A., Hadland, N., Pickett, D., Masaitis, D., Handy, D., Perez, A., Batcheldor, D., Wheeler, B., & Palmer, A. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114022 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationVithanage, M. S., Kumarathilaka, P., Oze, C., Karunatilake, S., Seneviratne, M., Hseu, Z., Gunarathne, V., Dassanayake, M., Ok, Y. S., & Rinklebe, J. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104974 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Mills, J. N., Katzarova, M., & Wagner, N. J. (2022) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.045 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Karl, D., Cannon, K. M., & Gurlo, A. (2021) · Open Ceramics · doi:10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100216 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationProperties and Characteristics of Regolith-Based Materials for Extraterrestrial Construction
Zhou, C., Gao, Y., Zhou, Y., She, W., Shi, Y., Ding, L., & Miao, C. (2024) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2023.11.019 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A Low-Pressure, N2/CO2 Atmosphere Is Suitable for Cyanobacterium-Based Life-Support Systems on Mars
Verseux, C., Heinicke, C., Ramalho, T. P., Determann, J., Duckhorn, M., Smagin, M., & Avila, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.611798 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Long-Fox, J. M., & Britt, D. T. (2023) · Frontiers in Space Technologies · doi:10.3389/frspt.2023.1255535 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationZaccardi, F., Toto, E., Santonicola, M. G., & Laurenzi, S. (2021) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.09.040 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Fackrell, L. E., Schroeder, P. A., Thompson, A., Stockstill-Cahill, K., & Hibbitts, C. A. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114055 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Feeding One Million People on Mars
Cannon, K. M., & Britt, D. T. (2019) · New Space · doi:10.1089/space.2019.0018 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationKarl, D., Duminy, T., Lima, P., Kamutzki, F., Gili, A., Zocca, A., Günster, J., & Gurlo, A. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.04.064 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
New simulants for martian regolith: Controlling iron variability
Ramkissoon, N. K., Pearson, V. K., Schwenzer, S. P., Schröder, C. A., Kirnbauer, T., Wood, D. A. C. A., Seidel, R., Miller, M. A., & Olsson‐Francis, K. (2019) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2019.104722 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hayes, A. G., Corlies, P., Tate, C., Barrington, M., Bell, J. F., III, Maki, J. N., Caplinger, M. A., Ravine, M. A., Kinch, K. M., Herkenhoff, K. E., et al. (2021) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00795-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Simulated asteroid materials based on carbonaceous chondrite mineralogies
Britt, D. T., Cannon, K. M., Hanna, K. L. D., Hogancamp, J. V., Poch, O., Beck, P., Martin, D. J. P., Escrig, J., Bonal, L., & Metzger, P. T. (2019) · Meteoritics and Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/maps.13345 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationWarren, P., Raju, N., Ebrahimi, H., Krsmanovic, M., Raghavan, S., Kapat, J. S., & Ghosh, R. R. (2022) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.329 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Duri, L. G., El-Nakhel, C., Caporale, A. G., Ciriello, M., Graziani, G., Pannico, A., Palladino, M., Ritieni, A., De Pascale, S., Vingiani, S., et al. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9050628 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cold sintering as a promising ISRU technique: A case study of Mars regolith simulant
Karacasulu, L., Karl, D., Gurlo, A., & Vakifahmetoglu, C. (2022) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115270 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Douglas, G. L., Wheeler, R. M., & Fritsche, R. F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13169424 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationDisambiguating the soils of Mars
Certini, G., Karunatillake, S., Zhao, Y., Meslin, P., Cousin, A., Hood, D. R., & Scalenghe, R. (2020) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.104922 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Palladino, M., Pascale, S. D., Duri, L. G., Rouphael, Y., & Adamo, P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116455 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Cohesion and shear strength of compacted lunar and Martian regolith simulants
Dotson, B., Valencia, D., Millwater, C., Easter, P., Long-Fox, J. M., Britt, D. T., & Metzger, P. T. (2024) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.115943 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, C., Yu, Z., Shao, R., & Li, J. (2024) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118723 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Definition and use of functional analogues in planetary exploration
Foucher, F., Hickman‐Lewis, K., Hützler, A., Joy, K. H., Folco, L., Bridges, J. C., Wozniakiewicz, P. J., Martínez‐Frías, J., Debaille, V., ZOLENSKY, M. E., et al. (2021) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2021.105162 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Castelein, S. M., Aarts, T. F., Schleppi, J., Hendrikx, R. W. A., Böttger, A., Benz, D., Marechal, M., Makaya, A., Brouns, S. J. J., Schwentenwein, M., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249962 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Microbial induced calcite precipitation can consolidate martian and lunar regolith simulants
Dikshit, R., Gupta, N., Dey, A., Viswanathan, K., & Kumar, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266415 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Giwa, I., Dempsey, M., Fiske, M. R., & Kazemian, A. (2024) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105571 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Clark, J. V., Archer, P. D., Gruener, J. E., Ming, D. W., Tu, V. M., Niles, P. B., & Mertzman, S. A. (2020) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113936 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Microbial Pathogenicity in Space
Simões, M. F., & Antunes, A. (2021) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens10040450 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Overview and recommendations for research on plants and microbes in regolith-based agriculture
Fackrell, L. E., Humphrey, S., Loureiro, R. R., Palmer, A. G., & Long-Fox, J. M. (2024) · npj Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1038/s44264-024-00013-5 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Selection of Anabaena sp. PCC 7938 as a Cyanobacterium Model for Biological ISRU on Mars
Ramalho, T. P., Chopin, G., Pérez-Carrascal, O. M., Tromas, N., & Verseux, C. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00594-22 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Synthetic space bricks from lunar and Martian regolith via sintering
Gupta, N., Dawara, V., Kumar, A., & Viswanathan, K. (2024) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.045 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Sintering of ceramics for clay in situ resource utilization on Mars
Karl, D., Kamutzki, F., Lima, P., Gili, A., Duminy, T., Zocca, A., Günster, J., & Gurlo, A. (2020) · Open Ceramics · doi:10.1016/j.oceram.2020.100008 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Shkolyar, S., Lalla, E. A., Konstantindis, M., Cote, K., Daly, M. G., & Steele, A. (2020) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114093 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Ren, X., Liu, J., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, Q., & Chen, W. (2022) · Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.sab.2022.106529 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Magnesium-Based Cements for Martian Construction
Scott, A., Oze, C., & Hughes, M. W. (2020) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001132 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Martian soil as revealed by ground-penetrating radar at the Tianwen-1 landing site
Chen, R., Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Liu, R., Bugiolacchi, R., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Zeng, Z., & Liu, C. (2023) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g50632.1 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
David, G., Meslin, P., Dehouck, E., Gasnault, O., Cousin, A., Forni, O., Berger, G., Lasue, J., Pinet, P., Wiens, R. C., et al. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114481 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Developing an alternative medium for in-space biomanufacturing
Lee, H., Diao, J., Tian, Y., Guleria, R., Lee, E., Smith, A., Savage, M., Yeh, D. H., Roberson, L. B., Blenner, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56088-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Freissinet, C., Knudson, C. A., Graham, H. V., Lewis, J. M. T., Lasue, J., McAdam, A. C., Teinturier, S., Szopa, C., Dehouck, E., Morris, R. V., et al. (2020) · The Planetary Science Journal · doi:10.3847/psj/aba690 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Beblo‐Vranesevic, K., Piepjohn, J., Antunes, A., & Rettberg, P. (2022) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550422000064 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Preparation and characterization of Martian soil simulant NEU Mars-1
Guan, J., Liu, A., Kai-yu, X. I. E., Shi, Z., & Kubíková, B. (2020) · Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China · doi:10.1016/s1003-6326(19)65193-9 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
On the growth dynamics of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7938 in Martian regolith
Ramalho, T. P., Chopin, G., Salman, L., Baumgartner, V., Heinicke, C., & Verseux, C. (2022) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-022-00240-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Experimental Investigation of the Atmosphere-Regolith Water Cycle on Present-Day Mars
Ramachandran, A. V., Zorzano, M., & Martín‐Torres, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21217421 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Duri, L. G., Pannico, A., Petropoulos, S. A., Caporale, A. G., Adamo, P., Graziani, G., Ritieni, A., Pascale, S. D., & Rouphael, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.890786 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Interface Direct Shear Tests on JEZ-1 Mars Regolith Simulant
Yin, K., Liu, J., Lin, J., Vasilescu, A.-R., Othmani, K., & Filippo, E. D. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11157052 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Potential Biological Remediation Strategies for Removing Perchlorate from Martian Regolith
Misra, G., Smith, W., Garner, M. C., & Loureiro, R. R. (2021) · New Space · doi:10.1089/space.2020.0055 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Phobos and Deimos surface composition: search for spectroscopic analogues
Poggiali, G., Matsuoka, M., Barucci, M. A., Brucato, J. R., Beck, P., Fornasier, S., Doressoundiram, A., Merlin, F., & Alberini, A. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2226 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Zaccaria, T., de Jonge, M. I., Domínguez‐Andrés, J., Netea, M. G., Beblo‐Vranesevic, K., & Rettberg, P. (2024) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2023.0057 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
StarCrete: A starch-based biocomposite for off-world construction
Roberts, A. D., & Scrutton, N. S. (2023) · Open Engineering · doi:10.1515/eng-2022-0390 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Development of a Lizard-Inspired Robot for Mars Surface Exploration
Chen, G., Qiao, L., Zhou, Z., Richter, L., & Ji, A. (2023) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics8010044 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Imaging Mars analog minerals' reflectance spectra and testing mineral detection algorithms
Wu, X. C., Mustard, J. F., Tarnas, J., Zhang, X., Das, E., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114644 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
CaSSIS color and multi-angular observations of Martian slope streaks
Valantinas, A., Becerra, P., Pommerol, A., Tornabene, L. L., Affolter, L., Cremonese, G., Hauber, E., McEwen, A. S., Munaretto, G., Pajola, M., et al. (2021) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2021.105373 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Metals extraction on Mars through carbothermic reduction
Nababan, D. C., Shaw, M., Humbert, M. S., Mukhlis, R. Z., & Rhamdhani, M. A. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.009 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Connecting soils to life in conservation planning, nutrient cycling, and planetary science
Lybrand, R. A. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104247 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Evidence for transient morning water frost deposits on the Tharsis volcanoes of Mars
Valantinas, A., Thomas, N., Pommerol, A., Karatekin, Ö., Lozano, L. R., Senel, C. B., Temel, O., Hauber, E., Tirsch, D., Bickel, V., et al. (2024) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-024-01457-7 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Kanellopoulos, C. (2020) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114649 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tarnas, J., Mustard, J. F., Wu, X. C., Das, E., Cannon, K. M., Hundal, C. B., Pascuzzo, A. C., Kellner, J. R., & Parente, M. C. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114402 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationHydrogels Improve Plant Growth in Mars Analog Conditions
Peyrusson, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.729278 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A molecular study of Italian ryegrass grown on Martian regolith simulant
Berni, R., Leclercq, C. C., Roux, P., Hausman, J.-F., Renaut, J., & Guerriero, G. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158774 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Barkó, G., Kalácska, G., Keresztes, R., Zsidai, L., Shegawu, H., & Kalácska, Á. (2023) · Lubricants · doi:10.3390/lubricants11080334 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Marscrete: A Martian Concrete for Additive Construction Applications Utilizing In Situ Resources
Troemner, M., Ramyar, E., Marrero, R., Mendu, K., & Gianluca Cusatis, A. (2021) · ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) · doi:10.1061/9780784483374.074 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The legume-rhizobia symbiosis can be supported on Mars soil simulants
Rainwater, R., & Mukherjee, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259957 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Water Ice and Possible Habitability in the Landing Area of Tianwen-1 Mission
Jiang, C., Ding, C., Su, Y., Xing, S., Li, J., & Dai, S. (2024) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01068-z · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zamani, M. N., Shah, M. S. A., Umar, S., Yahaya, N., Mukhlas, N. ‘., Kim, J. H.-J., & Noor, N. M. (2024) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.059 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kalácska, Á., Parmentier, V., Baets, P. D., & Kalácska, G. (2025) · Wear · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2025.205791 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Naz, N., Liu, D., Harandi, B. F., & Kounaves, S. P. (2022) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2022.0022 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Geotechnical Review of Existing Mars Soil Simulants for Surface Mobility
Oravec, H. A., Asnani, V. M., Creage, C. M., & Moreland, S. J. (2021) · ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) · doi:10.1061/9780784483374.016 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Releasing Atmospheric Martian Dust in Sand Grain Impacts
Becker, T., Teiser, J., Jardiel, T., Peiteado, M., Muñoz, O., Martikainen, J., Martı́n, J. C. G., & Wurm, G. (2022) · The Planetary Science Journal · doi:10.3847/psj/ac8477 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mars Simulation Facilities: A Review of Recent Developments, Capabilities and Applications
Wipf, S., Nitsche, R., Burr, D. J., & Elsaesser, A. (2023) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-023-00377-6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Observed seasonal changes in Martian hydrogen chloride explained by heterogeneous chemistry
Taysum, B. M., Palmer, P. I., Olsen, K. S., Luginin, M., Ignatiev, N., Trokhimovskiy, A. Y., Shakun, A. V., Grigoriev, A. V., Montmessin, F., & Korablev, O. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449546 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Thermal Weathering of 3D-Printed Lunar Regolith Simulant Composites
Marnot, A., Milliken, J., Cho, J., Lin, Z., Wong, C., Jones, J. M., Hill, C. W., & Brettmann, B. K. (2024) · ACS Applied Engineering Materials · doi:10.1021/acsaenm.4c00158 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
New Martian Dust Simulant JMDS‐1 and Applications to Laboratory Thermal Conductivity Measurements
Yu, W., Zeng, X., Li, X., Wei, G., & Fang, J. (2022) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1029/2020ea001347 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Habitability and Biosignature Formation in Simulated Martian Aqueous Environments
Macey, M. C., Ramkissoon, N. K., Cogliati, S., Toubes-Rodrigo, M., Stephens, B. P., Kucukkilic-Stephens, E., Schwenzer, S. P., Pearson, V. K., Preston, L. J., & Olsson‐Francis, K. (2022) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2021.0197 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Optical Constants of Martian Dust Analogs at UV–Visible–Near-infrared Wavelengths
Martikainen, J., Muñoz, O., Jardiel, T., Martı́n, J. C. G., Peiteado, M., Willame, Y., Penttilä, A., Muinonen, K., Wurm, G., & Becker, T. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf0be · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Itokawa regolith simulant IRS-1 as an S-type asteroid surface analogue
Zeng, X., Li, X., Martin, D. J. P., Tang, H., Yu, W., Yang, K., Wang, Z., & Wang, S. (2019) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.06.011 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
From local resources to in situ propellant and chemical production on Mars. A possible pathway
Pajares, A., Govea-Alvarez, P., Chen, Z., Conti, M., & Michielsen, B. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.162490 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
CO2 conversion over Martian and Lunar regolith simulants for extraterrestrial applications
Pajares, A., Guardia, P., Galvita, V., Conti, M., Lefevere, J., & Michielsen, B. (2024) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102729 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Exploring the dielectric loss of Martian regolith in the frequency domain using Zhurong radar data
Sun, J., Feng, Y., Cao, Y., Chen, S., Lei, Z., Dong, Y., Xi, M., & Tong, X. (2024) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116315 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Methanogens and what they tell us about how life might survive on Mars
Chellapandi, P., Premji, S. V., & Shanmugam, S. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409238.2024.2418639 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Resource-efficiency of cyanobacterium production on Mars: Assessment and paths forward
Ramalho, T. P., Baumgartner, V., Kunst, N., Rodrigues, D., Bohuon, E., Leroy, B., Pillot, G., Heinicke, C., Kerzenmacher, S., Avila, M., et al. (2024) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2024.103801 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Space Agriculture: A Comprehensive Systems-Level Review of Challenges and Opportunities
Fazayeli, H., Daigh, A. L. M., Palmer, C., Pitla, S. K., Jones, D., & Ge, Y. (2025) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15242541 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Matetich, C., & Vold, J. (2022) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001507 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Blue on red: Chemical conditions of liquid water emerging on simulated martian regolith
Rzymski, P., Klimaszyk, P., Kasianchuk, N., Jakubiak, P., Proch, J., & Niedzielski, P. (2022) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115263 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Akono, A. (2022) · Mechanics Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.104013 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Planetary Robotic Construction Using Large-Scale 3D Printing with Sulfur Concrete
Giwa, I., Hebert, M., Lamendola, J., Fiske, M. R., & Kazemian, A. (2024) · ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) · doi:10.1061/9780784485262.060 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Characterising water in Lunar and Martian regolith materials using nuclear magnetic resonance
O’Neill, K. T., Fridjonsson, E. O., Smeed, D., Hopper, T. A. J., & Johns, M. L. (2023) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115544 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Liquid State Sintering enhances Consolidation in Basalt-rich Lunar Regolith
Gupta, N., Dawara, V., Kumar, A., & Viswanathan, K. (2024) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.024 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Soureshjani, O. K., Massumi, A., & Nouri, G. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.10.056 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Database of Martian dust optical properties in the UV-vis-NIR
Martikainen, J., Muñoz, O., Martı́n, J. C. G., Varo, M. P., Jardiel, T., Peiteado, M., Willame, Y., Neary, L., Becker, T., & Wurm, G. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf108 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Shao, R., Wu, C., & Li, J. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124426 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wu, X. C., Zhang, X., Mustard, J. F., Tarnas, J., Lin, H., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13030500 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The upper-thermal stability of an iron-rich smectite: Implications for smectite formation on Mars
DePasquale, B. M., & Jenkins, D. M. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114816 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lifting of Tribocharged Grains by Martian Winds
Kruss, M., Salzmann, T., Parteli, E. J. R., Jungmann, F., Teiser, J., Schönau, L., & Wurm, G. (2021) · The Planetary Science Journal · doi:10.3847/psj/ac38a4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Spadaccia, S., Patty, L., Thomas, N., & Pommerol, A. (2023) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115503 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wang, H., Pijl, A. S., Liu, B., Wamelink, G. W. W., Korthals, G. W., Costa, O. Y. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040760 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Nababan, D. C., Pownceby, M. I., & Rhamdhani, M. A. (2025) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.04.050 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tiemblo, M. A., Maçario, I. P. E., Tornero, A., Yáñez, A., Andrejkovičová, S., & Gómez, F. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13051083 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Shumway, A. O., Catling, D. C., & Toner, J. D. (2023) · The Planetary Science Journal · doi:10.3847/psj/ace891 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cannon, K. M., Britt, D. T., Smith, T. M., Fritsche, R. F., & Batcheldor, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- Florida Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cannon, Kevin M.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 317
- Pages
- 470-478
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888719908
- Semantic Scholar
- d19bfae65f92942a53ba002e6654faf24ff6b324
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johnson Space Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
- Keywords
- Gale Crater, open standards, bulk chemistry, spectral properties, volatile content, Mars sample return
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review