The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foraminiferal faunal estimates of paleotemperature: Circumventing the No‐analog problem yields cool Ice Age tropics
Abstract
The sensitivity of the tropics to climate change, particularly the amplitude of glacial‐to‐interglacial changes in sea surface temperature (SST), is one of the great controversies in paleoclimatology. Here we reassess faunal estimates of ice age SSTs, focusing on the problem of no‐analog planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the equatorial oceans that confounds both classical transfer function and modern analog methods. A new calibration strategy developed here, which uses past variability of species to define robust faunal assemblages, solves the no‐analog problem and reveals ice age cooling of 5° to 6°C in the equatorial current systems of the Atlantic and eastern Pacific Oceans. Classical transfer functions underestimated temperature changes in some areas of the tropical oceans because core‐top assemblages misrepresented the ice age faunal assemblages. Our finding is consistent with some geochemical estimates and model predictions of greater ice age cooling in the tropics than was inferred by Climate: Long‐Range Investigation, Mapping, and Prediction (CLIMAP) [1981] and thus may help to resolve a long‐standing controversy. Our new foraminiferal transfer function suggests that such cooling was limited to the equatorial current systems, however, and supports CLIMAP's inference of stability of the subtropical gyre centers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean
Levitus, S. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i049p00962-02 · Cited by 3,078
Antoine, D., André, J., & Morel, A. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/95gb02832 · Cited by 911
Cited by
Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises
Williams, J. W., & Jackson, S. T. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/070037 · Cited by 1,736
Variability in the El Niño-Southern Oscillation Through a Glacial-Interglacial Cycle
Tudhope, A. W., Chilcott, C. P., McCulloch, M. T., Cook, E. R., Chappell, J., Ellam, R. M., Lea, D. W., Lough, J. M., & Shimmield, G. B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057969 · Cited by 909
Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models
Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., et al. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x · Cited by 849
Last Glacial Maximum and Holocene Climate in CCSM3
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Brady, E. C., Clauzet, G., Tomas, R., Levis, S., & Kothavala, Z. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3748.1 · Cited by 615
Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., & Poulsen, C. J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Mix, A. C., Morey, A. E., Pisias, N. G., & Hostetler, S. W.
- Venue
- Paleoceanography
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 350-359
- ISSN
- 0883-8305 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9186
- OpenAlex
- W2019161985
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraminiferal faunal estimates of paleotemperature: Circumventing the No‐analog problem yields cool Ice Age tropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999pa900012
- The paper
- Mix, A. C., Morey, A. E., Pisias, N. G., & Hostetler, S. W. (1999). Foraminiferal faunal estimates of paleotemperature: Circumventing the No‐analog problem yields cool Ice Age tropics. Paleoceanography. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999pa900012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.