Cited by 747Air Quality and Health ImpactsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsCOVID-19 impact on air quality

An estimate of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling

Open access
Anenberg, Susan C., Horowitz, Larry W., Tong, Daniel Q., West, J. Jason·2010·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ground-level concentrations of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter [< or = 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5)] have increased since preindustrial times in urban and rural regions and are associated with cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the global burden of mortality due to O3 and PM2.5 from anthropogenic emissions using global atmospheric chemical transport model simulations of preindustrial and present-day (2000) concentrations to derive exposure estimates. METHODS: Attributable mortalities were estimated using health impact functions based on long-term relative risk estimates for O3 and PM2.5 from the epidemiology literature. Using simulated concentrations rather than previous methods based on measurements allows the inclusion of rural areas where measurements are often unavailable and avoids making assumptions for background air pollution. RESULTS: Anthropogenic O3 was associated with an estimated 0.7 +/- 0.3 million respiratory mortalities (6.3 +/- 3.0 million years of life lost) annually. Anthropogenic PM2.5 was associated with 3.5 +/- 0.9 million cardiopulmonary and 220,000 +/- 80,000 lung cancer mortalities (30 +/- 7.6 million years of life lost) annually. Mortality estimates were reduced approximately 30% when we assumed low-concentration thresholds of 33.3 ppb for O3 and 5.8 microg/m3 for PM2.5. These estimates were sensitive to concentration thresholds and concentration-mortality relationships, often by > 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Anthropogenic O3 and PM2.5 contribute substantially to global premature mortality. PM2.5 mortality estimates are about 50% higher than previous measurement-based estimates based on common assumptions, mainly because of methodologic differences. Specifically, we included rural populations, suggesting higher estimates; however, the coarse resolution of the global atmospheric model may underestimate urban PM(2.5) exposures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.0901220

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anthropogenic ozone was associated with an estimated 700,000 ± 300,000 respiratory mortalities in 2000.

    “In one study, for example, anthropogenic ozone was associated with an estimated 700,000 ± 300,000 respiratory mortalities in 2000 (72).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Health Effects Institute International Scientific Oversight Committee 2004 Health Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries of Asia: A Literature Review Special Report 15 Boston Health Effects Institute
  2. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 2008 Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter (External Review Draft) EPA/600/R-08/139 Washington, DC U.S. EPA
  3. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 2009 Risk Assessment to Support the Review of the PM Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (External Review Draft) EPA 450/P-09-006 Research Triangle Park, NC U.S. EPA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anenberg, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Tong, D. Q., & West, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Science and Technology Corporation (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
West, J. Jason
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2010-04-09
Volume
118
Issue
9
Pages
1189-1195
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W1994464169
Cited by
747
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 29
FWCI
24.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › COVID-19 impact on air quality
Keywords
surface ozone, PM2.5, anthropogenic emissions, premature mortality, global burden of disease, respiratory mortality, cardiopulmonary mortality, lung cancer, years of life lost
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Lung Diseases, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Theoretical, Ozone, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review