The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of global NH3volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands
Open accessAbstract
One of the main causes of the low efficiency in nitrogen (N) use by crops is the volatilization of ammonia (NH 3) from fertilizers. Information taken from 1667 NH 3 volatilization measurements documented in 148 research papers was summarized to assess the influence on NH 3 volatilization of crop type, fertilizer type, and rate and mode of application and temperature, as well as soil organic carbon, texture, pH, CEC, measurement technique, and measurement location. The data set was summarized in three ways: (1) by calculating means for each of the factors mentioned, in which findings from each research paper were weighted equally; (2) by calculating weighted median values corrected for unbalanced features of the collected data; and (3) by developing a summary model using linear regression based on weighted median values for NH 3 volatilization and by calculating global NH 3 volatilization losses from fertilizer application using 0.5° resolution data on land use and soils. The calculated median NH 3 loss from global application of synthetic N fertilizers (78 million tons N per year) and animal manure (33 million tons N per year) amount to 14% (10–19%) and 23% (19–29%), respectively. In developing countries, because of high temperatures and the widespread use of urea, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium bicarbonate, estimated NH 3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers amounts to 18%, and in industrialized countries it amounts to 7%. The estimated NH 3 loss from animal manure is 21% in industrialized and 26% in developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
Paulot, F., Jacob, D. J., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Travis, K., & Henze, D. K. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2013jd021130 · Cited by 455
Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable
Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Clough, T. J., Sherlock, R. R., & Condron, L. M. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0870-3 · Cited by 453
The molecular processes of urea hydrolysis in relation to ammonia emissions from agriculture
Sigurdarson, J. J., Svane, S., & Karring, H. (2018) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-018-9466-1 · Cited by 336
Soil- and plant-based nitrogen-fertilizer recommendations in arable farming
Olfs, H., Blankenau, K., Brentrup, F., Jasper, J., Link, A., & Lammel, J. (2005) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200520526 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M., & Batjes, N. H.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2154054847
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of global NH3volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000gb001389
- The paper
- Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M., & Batjes, N. H. (2002). Estimation of global NH3volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.