Cited by 453Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable

Taghizadeh-Toosi, Arezoo, Clough, Tim J., Sherlock, Robert R., Condron, Leo M.·2012·Plant and Soil

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11104-011-0870-3

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in biochar-N and its 15N enrichment was higher in the more acidic biochars.

    “The increase in biochar-N and its 15 N enrichment was higher in the more acidic biochars.”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Biochar materials exposed to 15N-labelled NH3 became enriched in 15N.

    “Taghizadeh-Toosi et al. [65] who exposed biochar materials to 15 N-labelled NH3 which became enriched in 15 N.”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

  • There was transfer of 15N from the biochar to the soil (2.5%-10.6% 15N recovery).

    “there was transfer of the 15 N from the biochar to the soil (2.5%-10.6% 15 N recovery)”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Twenty-five days after application of 15N-enriched biochar to soil, plant biomass increased up to 3-fold.

    “Twenty five days after the application of these 15 N-enriched biochar materials to soil, plant biomass had increased up to 3-fold”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Non-labeled biochar treatments showed no differences from the controls in terms of biomass yield.

    “(non-labeled biochar treatments showed no differences from the controls in terms of biomass yield)”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Clough, T. J., Sherlock, R. R., & Condron, L. M.
Affiliations
Lincoln University (NZ)
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2011-07-06
Volume
350
Issue
1-2
Pages
57-69
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W1982374891
Cited by
453
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 8
FWCI
30.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, ammonia adsorption, bioavailability, 15N labeling, soil nitrogen, nitrogen cycling, carbon sequestration, root nitrogen uptake, soil organic nitrogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review