Cited by 106Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMarine and coastal ecosystemsClimate variability and models

Physical‐biological coupling in the California Current during the 1997–99 El Niño‐La Niña Cycle

Open access
Bograd, Steven J., Lynn, Ronald J.·2001·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The rapid transition from strong El Niño to strong La Niña conditions in the equatorial Pacific in 1998 was accompanied by considerable environmental variability in the southern California Current System (CCS). The evolution of this transition in the CCS is investigated based on hydrographic and biological data collected on 25 cruises over a 45‐month period (February 1996 to October 1999). The El Niño period was characterized by high steric heights and a deep nutricline in the coastal regions, which effectively limited biological production. This was followed by a period of increased cross‐shore dynamic height gradients, a significant shoaling of the nutricline, and a dramatic rebound in primary and secondary production. The observed physical and biological response in the CCS is remarkably similar to that observed in the tropical Pacific, but with a lag of several months.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gl012047

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate events can force large, temporary changes in overall productivity or community composition.

    “In some cases, a climate event can force large, temporary changes in overall productivity or community composition; these effects were seen during the large 1997-98 El Niño event [104] and the delayed upwelling in 2005 [78] in the California Current.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nifio anomalies, Prog. ¸ceanogr., in press, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bograd, S. J., & Lynn, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2001-01-15
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
275-278
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1966294063
Cited by
106
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
California Current System, El Niño, La Niña, physical-biological coupling, nutricline, steric height, primary production, secondary production, coastal upwelling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review