The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biogenic silica dissolution in the oceans: Reconciling experimental and field‐based dissolution rates
Open accessAbstract
On average, 50–60% of diatomaceous opal produced in the euphotic zone redissolves within the upper 100 m of the water column. High specific silica dissolution rates in the surface ocean contrast with order‐of‐magnitude lower values in deep‐sea sediments. The lack of a mechanistic understanding of these large variations in dissolution kinetics is a major source of uncertainty in models of nutrient silicon cycling in the oceans. Here we show that the observed variability in biogenic silica reactivity is consistent with results of experimental dissolution studies. Differences in aluminum content and specific surface area of the diatom skeletons, plus differences in temperature and degree of undersaturation, all contribute to lowering silica dissolution rates in deep‐sea sediments relative to the euphotic zone. When variations in these material and environmental properties are accounted for, the predicted specific opal dissolution rate in average surface ocean water is over 2 orders of magnitude faster than the rate measured in recently deposited biosiliceous oozes of the Southern Ocean. The predicted specific dissolution rate, however, is approximately 5 times higher than the value obtained from global estimates of the depth‐integrated dissolution rate and biogenic silica concentration in the upper water column. This discrepancy likely reflects the inhibitory effect of protective organic coatings on fresh diatom shells in surface waters. The experimental data further imply that aluminum incorporation in the silica matrix, during biomineralization or after death of the organisms, enhances the preservation efficiency of biogenic opal in marine sediments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models
Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., et al. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x · Cited by 849
Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine
Köhler, P., Hartmann, J., & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000545107 · Cited by 384
Laruelle, G. G., Roubeix, V., Sferratore, A., Brodherr, B., Ciuffa, D., Conley, D. J., Dürr, H. H., Garnier, J., Lancelot, C., Le Thi Phuong, Q., et al. (2009) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2008gb003267 · Cited by 286
Self-citationEhrlich, H., Demadis, K. D., Pokrovsky, O. S., & Koutsoukos, P. G. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900334y · Cited by 275
Mason, H. E., Du Frane, W. L., Walsh, S. D. C., Dai, Z., Charnvanichborikarn, S., & Carroll, S. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3039906 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Cappellen, P., Dixit, S., & van Beusekom, J.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1850052883
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogenic silica dissolution in the oceans: Reconciling experimental and field‐based dissolution rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001431
- The paper
- Van Cappellen, P., Dixit, S., & van Beusekom, J. (2002). Biogenic silica dissolution in the oceans: Reconciling experimental and field‐based dissolution rates. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.