Cited by 384Climate Change and GeoengineeringCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine

Open access
Köhler, Peter, Hartmann, Jens, Wolf-Gladrow, Dieter A.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Geoengineering is a proposed action to manipulate Earth’s climate in order to counteract global warming from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We investigate the potential of a specific geoengineering technique, carbon sequestration by artificially enhanced silicate weathering via the dissolution of olivine. This approach would not only operate against rising temperatures but would also oppose ocean acidification, because it influences the global climate via the carbon cycle. If important details of the marine chemistry are taken into consideration, a new mass ratio of CO 2 sequestration per olivine dissolution of about 1 is achieved, 20% smaller than previously assumed. We calculate that this approach has the potential to sequestrate up to 1 Pg of C per year directly, if olivine is distributed as fine powder over land areas of the humid tropics, but this rate is limited by the saturation concentration of silicic acid. In our calculations for the Amazon and Congo river catchments, a maximum annual dissolution of 1.8 and 0.4 Pg of olivine seems possible, corresponding to the sequestration of 0.5 and 0.1 Pg of C per year, but these upper limit sequestration rates come at the environmental cost of p H values in the rivers rising to 8.2. Open water dissolution of fine-grained olivine and an enhancement of the biological pump by the rising riverine input of silicic acid might increase our estimate of the carbon sequestration, but additional research is needed here. We finally calculate with a carbon cycle model the consequences of sequestration rates of 1–5 Pg of C per year for the 21st century by this technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1000545107

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) has been proposed as a promising marine carbon dioxide removal strategy.

    “Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) has been proposed as a promising marine carbon dioxide removal strategy.”

    From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Köhler et al., 2010

  • The measured SSA of a granular material is typically much higher than estimates of the surface area by geometric models of particle shapes, due to surface topography and porosity effects.

    “The measured SSA of a granular material is typically much higher than estimates of the surface area by geometric models of particle shapes, due to surface topography and porosity effects 15 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Naki ć enovi ć N, Swart R, eds. (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  2. [26]Zeebe RE, Wolf-Gladrow DA (2001) CO2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes , Elsevier Oceanography Book Series (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Köhler, P., Hartmann, J., & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-08
Volume
107
Issue
47
Pages
20228-20233
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1608266851
Cited by
384
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (acceptedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
geoengineering, olivine dissolution, carbon sequestration, ocean acidification, silicic acid, biological carbon pump, carbon cycle models, climate change mitigation
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Models, Chemical, Magnesium Compounds, Silicates, Rivers, Climate Change, Carbon Sequestration, Iron Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review