The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric aerosol models for systems including the ions H+, NH4+, Na+, SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, Br−, and H2O
Abstract
Mole fraction based equations for aqueous phase activities, together with equilibrium constants for the formation of gases and solids, have been combined with a Gibbs free energy minimization algorithm to create equilibrium phase partitioning models of inorganic atmospheric aerosols. The water content, phase state (solid or liquid), and gas/aerosol partitioning are predicted for known ionic composition, relative humidity, and temperature. The models are valid from <200 to 328 K for the subsystems (H+‐SO 42−‐NO 3−‐Cl−‐Br−‐H 2 O) and (H+‐NH 4+‐SO 42−‐NO 3−‐H 2 O), and 298.15 K only for (H+‐NH 4+‐Na+‐SO 42−‐NO 3−‐Cl−‐H 2 O). The models involve no simplifying assumptions and include all solid phases identified in bulk experiments, including hydrated and double salt forms not treated in most other studies. The Henry's law constant of H 2 SO 4 is derived as a function of temperature, based upon available data, and the model treatment of the solubility of HBr in aqueous H 2 SO 4 is revised. Phase diagrams are calculated for the (NH 4)2 SO 4/H 2 SO 4/H 2 O system to low temperature. The models are also used to explore the importance of the double salts in urban inorganic aerosols. These Aerosol Inorganics Model (AIM) models can be run on the Web for a variety of problem types at http://mae.ucdavis.edu/wexler/aim.html and http://www.uea.ac.uk/∼e770/aim.html, and their use is summarized here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006721 · Cited by 1,162
A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry
Thornton, J. A., Kercher, J. P., Riedel, T. P., Wagner, N. L., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Dubé, W. P., Wolfe, G. M., Quinn, P. K., Middlebrook, A. M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08905 · Cited by 652
Bertram, T. H., & Thornton, J. A. (2009) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009 · Cited by 357
Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U., Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., et al. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012 · Cited by 337
Guo, H., Liu, J., Froyd, K. D., Roberts, J. M., Veres, P. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., & Weber, R. J. (2017) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-17-5703-2017 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Wexler, A. S., & Clegg, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-07-26
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D14
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980026409
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric aerosol models for systems including the ions H+, NH4+, Na+, SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, Br−, and H2O. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000451
- The paper
- Wexler, A. S., & Clegg, S. L. (2002). Atmospheric aerosol models for systems including the ions H+, NH4+, Na+, SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, Br−, and H2O. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.