Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,133

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Global distribution of UV‐absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data

Open access
Herman, J. R., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., Celarier, E.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Global distributions of UV‐absorbing aerosols are obtained using measured differences between the 340 and the 380 nm radiances from the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) for the years 1979–1993. Time series are shown for major sources of biomass burning and desert dust giving the frequency of occurrence and areal coverage over land and oceans. Minor sources of UV‐absorbing aerosols in the atmosphere are also discussed (volcanic ash and oil fires). Relative values of year‐to‐year variability of UV‐absorbing aerosol amounts are shown for major aerosol source regions: (1) central South America (Brazil) near 10°S latitude; (2) Africa near 0°–20°S and 0° to 10°N latitude; (3) Saharan Desert and sub‐Saharan region (Sahel), Arabian Peninsula, and the northern border region of India; (4) agricultural burning in Indonesia, Eastern China, and Indochina, and near the mouth of the Amazon River; and (5) coal burning and dust in northeastern China. The first three of these regions dominate the injection of UV‐absorbing aerosols into the atmosphere each year and cover areas far outside of their source regions from advection of UV‐absorbing particulates by atmospheric wind systems. During the peak months, smoke and dust from these sources are transported at altitudes above 1 km with an optical depth of at least 0.1 and can cover about 10% of the Earth's surface. Boundary layer absorbing aerosols are not readily seen by TOMS because the small amount of underlying Rayleigh scattering leads to a small signal. Significant portions of the observed dust originate from agricultural regions frequently within arid areas, such as in the Sahel region of Africa, especially from the dry lake‐bed near Lake Chad (13.5°N, 14°E), and intermittently dry drainage areas and streams. In addition to drought cycle effects, this suggests there may be an anthropogenic component to the amount of dust injected into the atmosphere each year. Detection of absorbing aerosols and calculation of optical depths are affected by the presence of large‐scale and subpixel clouds in the TOMS field of view.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd03680

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,133

Metadata

Authors
Herman, J. R., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., & Celarier, E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-07
Volume
102
Issue
D14
Pages
16911-16922
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006482850
Cited by
1,133
References
0
FWCI
50.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global distribution of UV‐absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd03680
The paper
Herman, J. R., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., & Celarier, E. (1997). Global distribution of UV‐absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd03680

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.