Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large‐scale mass transports, water mass formation, and diffusivities estimated from World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) hydrographic data

Ganachaud, Alexandre·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

A global inversion is used to estimate the oceanic mass transports and vertical diffusivities based on a subset of hydrographic data from the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) and Java Australia Dynamic Experiment. The analysis is based on the linear inverse “box” model of Ganachaud and Wunsch [2000] that consistently combines the transoceanic sections. A globally consistent solution is obtained for a depth‐independent adjustment to the thermal wind field, the freshwater flux divergences, the Ekman transport, and the advective and diffusive dianeutral fluxes between layers. A detailed error budget permits calculation of statistical uncertainties, taking into account both the nonresolved part of the solution and the systematic errors due to the temporal oceanic variability. The horizontal structure of the transports for different density classes is analyzed regionally. During the WOCE period (1985–1996), net meridional transports are estimated, with 16 ± 2 Sv (10 6 m 3/s) of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) being produced in the northern North Atlantic, moving southward, entraining Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW), and Antarctic Intermediate Water increasing in volume transport to 23 ± 3 Sv at 30°S. In the Southern Ocean, 21 ± 6 Sv of bottom water was formed from lower Circumpolar Deep Water, which corresponds approximately to the lower NADW density range. Bottom water inflows (NADW + AABW mixture) to the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans are estimated at 6 ± 1.3, 11 ± 4, and 7 ± 2 Sv, respectively. In the Indian and Pacific Oceans this water returns southward at deep and intermediate levels. Property anomaly conservation constraints permit estimation of dianeutral diffusivities in deep layers, with a global average of 3.7 ± 0.7 cm 2 s−1 north of 30°S.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002jc001565

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Ganachaud, A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2003-07
Volume
108
Issue
C7
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083133290
Cited by
199
References
1
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale mass transports, water mass formation, and diffusivities estimated from World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) hydrographic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jc001565
The paper
Ganachaud, A. (2003). Large‐scale mass transports, water mass formation, and diffusivities estimated from World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) hydrographic data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.