The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interannual variability in atmospheric mineral aerosols from a 22‐year model simulation and observational data
Open accessAbstract
Mineral aerosols are important atmospheric constituents owing to their interactions with climate and biogeochemistry. The interannual variability in atmospheric mineral aerosols is evaluated using a model simulation of 1979–2000 and mineral aerosol observations. Overall, the variability in monthly means between different years is not as large as the variability within a month for column amount, surface concentration, and deposition fluxes. The magnitude of the variability predicted in the model varies spatially and appears similar to that seen in the available observations, although the model is not always able to simulate observed high‐ and low‐dust years. The area over which the interannual variability in the observing station data should be representative is estimated in the model simulation and is shown to be regional in extent. However, correlations between modeled surface concentrations at the stations and modeled deposition in the surrounding region is often low, suggesting that the observations of the variability of surface concentrations are difficult to extrapolate to variability in regional deposition fluxes. The correlations between modeled monthly mean optical depth and modeled deposition or mobilization are low to moderate (0.2–0.6) over much of the globe, indicating the difficulty of estimating mobilization or deposition fluxes from satellite retrievals of optical depth. In both the model and observations there are relationships between climate indices (e.g., North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño, and Pacific Decadal Oscillation) and dust, although a 22‐year simulation is not long enough to well characterize this relationship. In this model, simulation of 1979–2000, dust concentration variability appears to be dominated by transport variability and/or transport and source covariance rather than source strength variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physics of wind-blown sand and dust
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 · Cited by 1,608
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
Self-citationUpper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 889
Impact of desert dust on the biogeochemistry of phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems
Okin, G. S., Mahowald, N., Chadwick, O. A., & Artaxo, P. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2003gb002145 · Cited by 526
Self-citationA review on East Asian dust storm climate, modelling and monitoring
Shao, Y., & Dong, C. H. (2006) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.011 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahowald, N., Luo, C., del Corral, J., & Zender, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-06-19
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- D12
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127007970
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interannual variability in atmospheric mineral aerosols from a 22‐year model simulation and observational data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jd002821
- The paper
- Mahowald, N., Luo, C., del Corral, J., & Zender, C. S. (2003). Interannual variability in atmospheric mineral aerosols from a 22‐year model simulation and observational data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.