Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A model for studies of tropospheric ozone and nonmethane hydrocarbons: Model description and ozone results

von Kuhlmann, Rolf, Lawrence, Mark G., Crutzen, Paul J., Rasch, Philip J.·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We have developed a global three‐dimensional chemistry‐meteorology model for studies of ozone and hydrocarbons in the troposphere, called Model of Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry‐Max‐Planck‐Institute for Chemistry Version (MATCH‐MPIC). The model currently calculates the distributions of 54 species and 141 reactions using a new flexible chemical integration method in connection with a fast general Rosenbrock solver. The reactions can be easily expanded for future studies with the model. The model includes updated emission inventories, an explicit dry deposition scheme, online photolysis rates, extensive budgeting capabilities and a correction for the so‐called “mass‐wind inconsistency” problem. One‐year simulations at two different horizontal resolutions, approximately 1.9° × 1.9° (T63) and 5.6° × 5.6° (T21), both with 28 vertical levels, are extensively evaluated with available observations from surface stations, ozonesondes, and field campaigns. The model is generally able to reproduce the observations of ozone to within 10 nmol/mol, but it overestimates upper tropospheric ozone at northern high‐latitude stations in winter and spring and tends to underestimate the summer maximum in the free troposphere. In the tropics the chemical tropopause is sometimes too low. Generally, the low‐resolution run yields only slightly worse agreement with observations compared to the higher‐resolution run, thus making it suitable for further sensitivity studies. In a simulation using different meteorological data, O 3 agrees much better with observations in the upper troposphere, possibly because of the higher resolution near the tropopause. The net ozone production integrated over all tropospheric regions with a net production and loss separately reveals that the calculated chemically induced redistribution of ozone in the troposphere is 2–3 times larger than the net stratospheric influx. Even in the upper troposphere, photochemical production is of similar magnitude to the stratospheric influence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002jd002893

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Crutzen, P. J., & Rasch, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2003-05-13
Volume
108
Issue
D9
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129238026
Cited by
183
References
3
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for studies of tropospheric ozone and nonmethane hydrocarbons: Model description and ozone results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jd002893
The paper
von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Crutzen, P. J., & Rasch, P. J. (2003). A model for studies of tropospheric ozone and nonmethane hydrocarbons: Model description and ozone results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.