The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking land‐atmosphere‐stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system
Abstract
Any change in the ability of northern peatlands to act as a sink for atmospheric CO 2 will play a crucial part in the response of the Earth system to global warming. We argue that a true assessment of the sink‐source relationships of peatland ecosystems requires that losses of C in drainage waters be included when determining annual net C uptake, thus connecting measurements of stream C fluxes with those made at the land surface‐atmosphere interface. This was done by combining estimates of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) with stream water measurements of TOC, DIC, and gaseous C loss, in a 335‐ha lowland temperate peatland catchment (55°48.80′N, 03°14.40′W) in central Scotland over a 2‐year period (1996–1998). Mean annual downstream C flux was 304 (±62) kg C ha−1 yr−1, of which total organic carbon (TOC) contributed 93%, the remainder being dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and free CO 2. At the catchment outlet evasion loss of CO 2 from the stream surface was estimated to be an additional 46 kg C ha−1 yr−1. Over the study period, NEE of CO 2‐C resulted in a flux from the atmosphere to the land surface of 278 (±25) kg C ha−1 yr−1. Net C loss in drainage water, including both the downstream flux and CO 2 evasion from the stream surface to the atmosphere, was therefore greater or equal to the net annual C uptake as a result of photosynthesis/respiration at the land surface. By combining these and other flux terms, the overall C mass balance suggests that this system was either acting as a terrestrial C source or was C neutral.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102500 · Cited by 1,379
Cited by
Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J., Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg, J. J., et al. (2007) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8 · Cited by 3,941
Villa, J. A., & Bernal, B. (2018) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.037 · Cited by 233
The role of waterborne carbon in the greenhouse gas balance of drained and re-wetted peatlands
Evans, C. D., Renou-Wilson, F., & Strack, M. (2016) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-015-0447-y · Cited by 139
Effects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands
Zhong, Y., Jiang, M., & Middleton, B. A. (2020) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Billett, M. F., Palmer, S. M., Hope, D., Deacon, C., Storeton‐West, R., Hargreaves, K. J., Flechard, C., & Fowler, D.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-02-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2125717927
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking land‐atmosphere‐stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003gb002058
- The paper
- Billett, M. F., Palmer, S. M., Hope, D., Deacon, C., Storeton‐West, R., Hargreaves, K. J., Flechard, C., & Fowler, D. (2004). Linking land‐atmosphere‐stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.