Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM): Evaluating the use of global area burnt satellite data

Open access
Hoelzemann, Judith J., Schultz, Martin G., Brasseur, Guy P., Granier, Claire, Simon, Muriel·2004·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The new Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM) has been developed on the basis of data from the European Space Agency's monthly Global Burnt Scar satellite product (GLOBSCAR) and results from the Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM). GWEM computes monthly emissions of more than 40 chemical compounds and aerosols from forest and savanna fires. This study focuses on an evaluation of the GLOBSCAR data set. The GWEM version presented here makes use of the Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land cover map. Emission totals for the year 2000 are 1741 Tg C, 5716 Tg CO 2, 271 Tg CO, 12.52 Tg CH 4, 9.09 Tg C (as nonmethane hydrocarbons), 8.08 Tg NO x (as NO), 24.30 Tg PM 2.5, 15.80 Tg OC, and 1.84 Tg black carbon. These emissions are lower than other estimates found in literature. An evaluation assesses the uncertainties of the individual input data. The GLOBSCAR product yields reasonable estimates of burnt area for large wildland fires in most parts of the globe but experiences problems in some regions where small fires dominate. The seasonality derived from GLOBSCAR differs from other satellite products detecting active fires owing to the different algorithms applied. Application of the presented GWEM results in global chemistry transport modeling will require additional treatment of small deforestation fires in the tropical rain forest regions and small savanna fires, mainly in subequatorial Africa. Further improvements are expected from a more detailed description of the carbon pools and the inclusion of anthropogenic disturbances in the LPJ model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2003jd003666

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Hoelzemann, J. J., Schultz, M. G., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Simon, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2004-06-05
Volume
109
Issue
D14
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013595421
Cited by
317
References
48
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM): Evaluating the use of global area burnt satellite data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd003666
The paper
Hoelzemann, J. J., Schultz, M. G., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Simon, M. (2004). Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM): Evaluating the use of global area burnt satellite data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003666

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.