The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948 to present
Abstract
We have produced a 0.5° × 0.5° monthly global soil moisture data set for the period from 1948 to the present. The land model is a one‐layer “bucket” water balance model, while the driving input fields are Climate Prediction Center monthly global precipitation over land, which uses over 17,000 gauges worldwide, and monthly global temperature from global Reanalysis. The output consists of global monthly soil moisture, evaporation, and runoff, starting from January 1948. A distinguishing feature of this data set is that all fields are updated monthly, which greatly enhances utility for near‐real‐time purposes. Data validation shows that the land model does well; both the simulated annual cycle and interannual variability of soil moisture are reasonably good against the limited observations in different regions. A data analysis reveals that, on average, the land surface water balance components have a stronger annual cycle in the Southern Hemisphere than those in the Northern Hemisphere. From the point of view of soil moisture, climates can be characterized into two types, monsoonal and midlatitude climates, with the monsoonal ones covering most of the low‐latitude land areas and showing a more prominent annual variation. A global soil moisture empirical orthogonal function analysis and time series of hemisphere means reveal some interesting patterns (like El Niño‐Southern Oscillation) and long‐term trends in both regional and global scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NCEP Climate Forecast System
Saha, S., Nadiga, S., Thiaw, C., Wang, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Van den Dool, H. M., Pan, H.-L., Moorthi, S., Behringer, D., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3812.1 · Cited by 1,120
Self-citationSheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat‐Capdevila, A., & Verbist, K. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2017wr022437 · Cited by 561
Global Estimates of Inorganic Nitrogen Deposition Across Four Decades
Ackerman, D., Millet, D. B., & Chen, X. (2019) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2018gb005990 · Cited by 486
Constraints on global fire activity vary across a resource gradient
Krawchuk, M. A., & Moritz, M. A. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/09-1843.1 · Cited by 472
Evaluation of the Reanalysis Products from GSFC, NCEP, and ECMWF Using Flux Tower Observations
Decker, M., Brunke, M. A., Wang, Z., Sakaguchi, K., Zeng, X., & Bosilovich, M. G. (2012) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00004.1 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, Y., & van den Dool, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-05-20
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- D10
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972568755
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948 to present. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003jd004345
- The paper
- Fan, Y., & van den Dool, H. (2004). Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948 to present. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.