The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K
Open accessAbstract
We present two continuous global geomagnetic field models for recent millennia: CALS3K.2, covering the past 3000 years, and CALS7K.2, covering 7000 years from 5000 BC to 1950 AD. The models were determined by regularized least squares inversion of archeomagnetic and paleomagnetic data using spherical harmonics in space and cubic B splines in time. They are derived from a greatly increased number of paleomagnetic directional data, compared to previous efforts, and for the first time a significant amount of archeointensity data is used in this kind of global model, allowing the determination of evolution of geomagnetic dipole strength. While data accuracy and dating uncertainties remain a limitation, reliable low‐resolution global models can be obtained. The results agree well with previous results from virtual axial dipole moment (VADM) studies from archeomagnetic intensity data apart from a systematic offset in strength. A comparison of model predictions with the previous 3000 year model, CALS3K.1, gives general agreement but also some significant differences particularly for the early epochs. The new models suggest that the prominent two northern hemisphere flux lobes are more stationary than CALS3K.1 implied, extending considerably the time span of stationary flux lobes observed in historical models. Between 5000 BC and 2000 BC there are time intervals of weak dipole moment where dipole power is exceeded by low‐degree nondipole power at the core‐mantle boundary. Model coefficients and evaluation code can be obtained from the EarthRef Digital Archive (ERDA) together with animations and snapshots plots for every 100 years at http://www.earthref.org. Detailed URLs for the different material are listed in Appendix A.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cosmogenic Nuclides: Principles, Concepts and Applications in the Earth Surface Sciences
Dunai, T. J. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804519 · Cited by 451
A geomagnetic field model for the Holocene based on archaeomagnetic and lava flow data
Pavón-Carrasco, F. J., Osete, M. L., Torta, J. M., & De Santis, A. (2014) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.046 · Cited by 384
Solar activity during the last 1000 yr inferred from radionuclide records
Muscheler, R., Joos, F., Beer, J., Müller, S. A., Vonmoos, M., & Snowball, I. (2007) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.012 · Cited by 373
Recent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows
Johnson, C. L., Constable, C. G., Tauxe, L., Barendregt, R., Brown, L. L., Coe, R. S., Layer, P., Mejia, V., Opdyke, N. D., Singer, B. S., et al. (2008) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2007gc001696 · Cited by 275
Self-citationReconstructing Holocene geomagnetic field variation: new methods, models and implications.
Nilsson, A., Holme, R., Korte, M., Suttie, N., & Hill, M. (2014) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggu120 · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Korte, M., & Constable, C. G.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1504152074
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004gc000801
- The paper
- Korte, M., & Constable, C. G. (2005). Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gc000801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.