The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows
Abstract
We present a synthesis of 0–5 Ma paleomagnetic directional data collected from 17 different locations under the collaborative Time Averaged geomagnetic Field Initiative (TAFI). When combined with regional compilations from the northwest United States, the southwest United States, Japan, New Zealand, Hawaii, Mexico, South Pacific, and the Indian Ocean, a data set of over 2000 sites with high quality, stable polarity, and declination and inclination measurements is obtained. This is a more than sevenfold increase over similar quality data in the existing Paleosecular Variation of Recent Lavas (PSVRL) data set, and has greatly improved spatial sampling. The new data set spans 78°S to 53°N, and has sufficient temporal and spatial sampling to allow characterization of latitudinal variations in the time‐averaged field (TAF) and paleosecular variation (PSV) for the Brunhes and Matuyama chrons, and for the 0–5 Ma interval combined. The Brunhes and Matuyama chrons exhibit different TAF geometries, notably smaller departures from a geocentric axial dipole field during the Brunhes, consistent with higher dipole strength observed from paleointensity data. Geographical variations in PSV are also different for the Brunhes and Matuyama. Given the high quality of our data set, polarity asymmetries in PSV and the TAF cannot be attributed to viscous overprints, but suggest different underlying field behavior, perhaps related to the influence of long‐lived core‐mantle boundary conditions on core flow. PSV, as measured by dispersion of virtual geomagnetic poles, shows less latitudinal variation than predicted by current statistical PSV models, or by previous data sets. In particular, the Brunhes data reported here are compatible with a wide range of models, from those that predict constant dispersion as a function of latitude to those that predict an increase in dispersion with latitude. Discriminating among such models could be helped by increased numbers of low‐latitude data and new high northern latitude sites. Tests with other data sets, and with simulations, indicate that some of the latitudinal signature previously observed in VGP dispersion can be attributed to the inclusion of low‐quality, insufficiently cleaned data with too few samples per site. Our Matuyama data show a stronger dependence of dispersion on latitude than the Brunhes data. The TAF is examined using the variation of inclination anomaly with latitude. Best fit two‐parameter models have axial quadrupole contributions of 2–4% of the axial dipole term, and axial octupole contributions of 1–5%. Approximately 2% of the octupole signature is likely the result of bias incurred by averaging unit vectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., & Stein, S. (1994) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/94gl02118 · Cited by 3,462
Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records
Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T., & Walker, M. R. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0569 · Cited by 1,085
The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals
Glatzmaier, G. A., Coe, R. S., Hongre, L., & Roberts, P. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44776 · Cited by 585
Self-citationTauxe, L., & Kent, D. V. (2013) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/145gm08 · Cited by 508
Self-citationGeomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years
Valet, J.-P., Meynadier, L., & Guyodo, Y. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03674 · Cited by 483
Bloxham, J., Gubbins, D., & Jackson, A. (1989) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.1989.0087 · Cited by 347
Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary
Bloxham, J., & Jackson, A. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/92jb01591 · Cited by 335
Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data
Hulot, G., Eymin, C., Langlais, B., Mandea, M., & Olsen, N. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416620a · Cited by 315
The Magnetic Field of the Earth: Paleomagnetism, the Core, and the Deep Mantle
Merrill, R. T., McElhinny, M. W., McFadden, P. L., & Banerjee, S. K. (1997) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881919 · Cited by 310
Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K
Korte, M., & Constable, C. G. (2005) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2004gc000801 · Cited by 307
Self-citation
Cited by
van Hinsbergen, D. J. J., Torsvik, T. H., Schmid, S. M., Maţenco, L. C., Maffione, M., Vissers, R. L. M., Gürer, D., & Spakman, W. (2020) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.009 · Cited by 641
Persistent high paleosecular variation activity in southern hemisphere for at least 10,000 years
Constable, C., Korte, M., & Panovska, S. (2016) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.015 · Cited by 277
Self-citationLhuillier, F., & Gilder, S. A. (2019) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggy517 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, C. L., Constable, C. G., Tauxe, L., Barendregt, R., Brown, L. L., Coe, R. S., Layer, P., Mejia, V., Opdyke, N. D., Singer, B. S., Staudigel, H., & Stone, D. B.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1591680199
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007gc001696
- The paper
- Johnson, C. L., Constable, C. G., Tauxe, L., Barendregt, R., Brown, L. L., Coe, R. S., Layer, P., Mejia, V., Opdyke, N. D., Singer, B. S., Staudigel, H., & Stone, D. B. (2008). Recent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gc001696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.