Cited by 67Fire effects on ecosystemsDisaster Management and ResilienceFire dynamics and safety research

Quantifying bushfire penetration into urban areas in Australia.

Open access
Chen, Keping, McAneney, John·2004·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The extent and trajectory of bushfire penetration at the bushland‐urban interface are quantified using data from major historical fires in Australia. We find that the maximum distance at which homes are destroyed is typically less than 700 m. The probability of home destruction emerges as a simple linear and decreasing function of distance from the bushland‐urban boundary but with a variable slope that presumably depends upon fire regime and human intervention. The collective data suggest that the probability of home destruction at the forest edge is around 60%. Spatial patterns of destroyed homes display significant neighbourhood clustering. Our results provide revealing spatial evidence for estimating fire risk to properties and suggest an ember‐attack model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004gl020244

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fuel management close to houses was more effective than fuel management further from houses can be explained by the behaviour of embers and radiant heat-the principal causes of house loss during wildfires.

    “Our finding that fuel management close to houses was more effective than fuel management further from houses can be explained by the behaviour of embers and radiant heat—the principal causes of house loss during wildfires [20], [22], [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ahern, A., and M. Chladil (1999), How far do bushfires penetrate urban areas?, paper presented at 1999 Australian Disaster Conference, Emer- gency Manage. of Aust., Canberra, A. C. T.
  2. Gill, A. M., and P. H. R. Moore (1998), Big versus small fires: The bush- fires of Greater Sydney, January 1994, in Large Forest Fires, edited by J. M. Moreno, pp. 49 -68, Backhuys, Leiden, Netherlands.
  3. Johnson, E. A., and K. Miyanishi (Eds.) (2001), Forest Fires: Behaviour and Ecological Effects, Academic, San Diego, Calif.
  4. Munich Re (2004), Topics Geo: Annual review of natural catastrophes 2003, report, Munich, Germany. (Available at http://www.munichre.com)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., & McAneney, J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Chen, Keping
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2004-06
Volume
31
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2087295820
Cited by
67
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
Keywords
bushfires, urban fire spread, home destruction, fire regimes, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review