Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions

Gedney, N., Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C.·2004·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The potential for wetland emissions to feedback on climate change has been previously hypothesised [Houghton et al., 2001]. We assess this hypothesis using an interactive wetlands scheme radiatively coupled to an integrated climate change effects model. The scheme predicts wetland area and methane (CH 4) emissions from soil temperature and water table depth, and is constrained by optimising its ability to reproduce the observed inter‐annual variability in atmospheric CH 4. In transient climate change simulations the wetland response amplifies the total anthropogenic radiative forcing at 2100 by about 3.5–5%. The modelled increase in global CH 4 flux from wetland is comparable to the projected increase in anthropogenic CH 4 emissions over the 21st century under the IS92a scenario.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004gl020919

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Gedney, N., Cox, P. M., & Huntingford, C.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2004-10
Volume
31
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2064920548
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004gl020919
The paper
Gedney, N., Cox, P. M., & Huntingford, C. (2004). Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020919

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.