The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data
Open accessAbstract
Hourly averaged interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and plasma data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) and Wind spacecraft, generated from 1 to 4 min resolution data time‐shifted to Earth have been analyzed for systematic and random differences. ACE moments‐based proton densities are larger than Wind/Solar Wind Experiment (SWE) fits‐based densities by up to 18%, depending on solar wind speed. ACE temperatures are less than Wind/SWE temperatures by up to ∼25%. ACE densities and temperatures were normalized to equivalent Wind values in National Space Science Data Center's creation of the OMNI 2 data set that contains 1963–2004 solar wind field and plasma data and other data. For times of ACE‐Wind transverse separations <60 R E , random differences between Wind values and normalized ACE values are ∼0.2 nT for ∣ B ∣, ∼0.45 nT for IMF Cartesian components, ∼5 km/s for flow speed, and ∼15 and ∼30% for proton densities and temperatures. These differences grow as a function of transverse separation more rapidly for IMF parameters than for plasma parameters. Autocorrelation analyses show that spatial scales become progressively shorter for the parameter sequence: flow speed, IMF magnitude, plasma density and temperature, IMF X and Y components, and IMF Z component. IMF variations have shorter scales at solar quiet times than at solar active times, while plasma variations show no equivalent solar cycle dependence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Heliospheric Magnetic Field
Owens, M. J., & Forsyth, R. J. (2013) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-5 · Cited by 263
Space weather: risk factors for Global Navigation Satellite Systems
Demyanov, V., & Yasyukevich, Y. (2021) · Solar-Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.12737/stp-72202104 · Cited by 42
Properties of stream interaction regions at Earth and Mars during the declining phase of SC 24
Geyer, P., Temmer, M., Guo, J., & Heinemann, S. G. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040162 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- King, J. H., & Papitashvili, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- A2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998820031
- Cited by
- 1,444
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004ja010649
- The paper
- King, J. H., & Papitashvili, N. E. (2005). Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.