The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of global wind power
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this study is to quantify the world's wind power potential for the first time from data. Wind speeds are calculated at 80 m, the hub height of modern, 77‐m diameter, 1500 kW turbines. Since relatively few observations are available at 80 m, the Least Square extrapolation technique is utilized and revised here to obtain estimates of wind speeds at 80 m given observed wind speeds at 10 m (widely available) and a network of sounding stations. Tower data from the Kennedy Space Center (Florida) were used to validate the results. Globally, ∼13% of all reporting stations experience annual mean wind speeds ≥ 6.9 m/s at 80 m (i.e., wind power class 3 or greater) and can therefore be considered suitable for low‐cost wind power generation. This estimate is believed to be conservative. Of all continents, North America has the largest number of stations in class ≥ 3 (453), and Antarctica has the largest percent (60%). Areas with great potential are found in northern Europe along the North Sea, the southern tip of the South American continent, the island of Tasmania in Australia, the Great Lakes region, and the northeastern and northwestern coasts of North America. The global average 10‐m wind speed over the ocean from measurements is 6.64 m/s (class 6); that over land is 3.28 m/s (class 1). The calculated 80‐m values are 8.60 m/s (class 6) and 4.54 m/s (class 1) over ocean and land, respectively. Over land, daytime 80‐m wind speed averages obtained from soundings (4.96 m/s) are slightly larger than nighttime ones (4.85 m/s); nighttime wind speeds increase, on average, above daytime speeds above 120 m. Assuming that statistics generated from all stations analyzed here are representative of the global distribution of winds, global wind power generated at locations with mean annual wind speeds ≥ 6.9 m/s at 80 m is found to be ∼72 TW (∼54,000 Mtoe) for the year 2000. Even if only ∼20% of this power could be captured, it could satisfy 100% of the world's energy demand for all purposes (6995–10177 Mtoe) and over seven times the world's electricity needs (1.6–1.8 TW). Several practical barriers need to be overcome to fully realize this potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Löffler, K., Hainsch, K., Burandt, T., Oei, P.-Y., Kemfert, C., & Von Hirschhausen, C. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10101468 · Cited by 225
Wood, R. (2021) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-21-14507-2021 · Cited by 104
Unavailability of wind turbines due to wind-induced accelerations
Dueñas-Osorio, L., & Basu, B. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.015 · Cited by 98
Impact of wind-energy generation on climate: A rising spectre
Abbasi, S. A., Tabassum-Abbasi, & Abbasi, T. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.262 · Cited by 81
Goldberg, D. S., Lackner, K. S., Han, P., Slagle, A. L., & Wang, T. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401531y · Cited by 73
Market Failure and the Structure of Externalities
(2010) · Harnessing Renewable Energy in Electric Power Systems · doi:10.4324/9781936331864-15 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, C. L., & Jacobson, M. Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-06-27
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- D12
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086850772
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.