Cited by 235Integrated Energy Systems OptimizationHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsElectric Power System Optimization

Designing a Model for the Global Energy System—GENeSYS-MOD: An Application of the Open-Source Energy Modeling System (OSeMOSYS)

Open access
Löffler, Konstantin, Hainsch, Karlo, Burandt, Thorsten, Oei, Pao-Yu, Kemfert, Claudia, Von Hirschhausen, Christian·2017·Energies

Abstract

This paper develops a path for the global energy system up to 2050, presenting a new application of the open-source energy modeling system (OSeMOSYS) to the community. It allows quite disaggregate energy and emission analysis: Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD) uses a system of linear equations of the energy system to search for lowest-cost solutions for a secure energy supply, given externally defined constraints, mainly in terms of CO2-emissions. The general algebraic modeling system (GAMS) version of OSeMOSYS is updated to the newest version and, in addition, extended and enhanced to include e.g., a modal split for transport, an improved trading system, and changes to storages. The model can be scaled from small-scale applications, e.g., a company, to cover the global energy system. The paper also includes an application of GENeSYS-MOD to analyze decarbonization scenarios at the global level, broken down into 10 regions. Its main focus is on interdependencies between traditionally segregated sectors: electricity, transportation, and heating; which are all included in the model. Model calculations suggests that in order to achieve the 1.5–2 °C target, a combination of renewable energy sources provides the lowest-cost solution, solar photovoltaic being the dominant source. Average costs of electricity generation in 2050 are about 4 €cents/kWh (excluding infrastructure and transportation costs).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en10101468

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Chamoni, P., Leisten, R., Martin, A., Minnemann, J., Stadtler, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Duisburg, Germany, 2001; Volume 2001, pp. 75-82. ISBN 978-3-540-43344-6.
  2. Yang, Z.; Eckaus, R.S.; Ellerman, A.D.; Jacoby, H.D. The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model; Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996; p. 49.
  3. Lesourd, J.-B., Percebois, J., Valette, F., Eds.; Routledge Studies in the History of Economic Modelling; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 1996; pp. 14-29. ISBN 978-0-415-12975-6.
  4. SSRN, Wind Providing Balancing Reserves-An Application to the German Electricity System of 2025. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2952288 (accessed on 9 September 2017).
  5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 2014.
  6. Edenhofer, O.; Pichs Madruga, R.; Sokona, Y.; UNEP; WMO; IPCC; PIK (Eds.) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-1-107-02340-6.
  7. OECD, Renewables Information 2016. Available online: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/renewables- information-2016_renew-2016-en;jsessionid=lxmv0jej2xlb.x-oecd-live-03 (accessed on 22 September 2017).
  8. Hau, E. Windkraftanlagen; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; ISBN 978-3-540-72150-5.
  9. Stefánsson, V. Estimate of the World Geothermal Potential. In Geothermal Training in Iceland 20th Anniversary Workshop; The United Nations University: Reykjavik, Iceland, 1998; pp. 111-120.
  10. Geothermal Legacy Collection, EPRI Geothermal Energy Prospects for the Next 50 Years. EPRI ER-611-SR Special Report 1978. Available online: http://www.osti.gov/geothermal/servlets/purl/5027376 (accessed on 22 September 2017).
  11. Decarbonizing the Indian Energy System until 2050: An Application of the Open Source Energy Modeling System OSeMOSYS. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318966842_ Decarbonizing_the_Indian_Energy_System_until_2050_-_An_Application_of_the_Open_Source_Energy_ Modeling_System_OSeMOSYS (accessed on 22 September 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löffler, K., Hainsch, K., Burandt, T., Oei, P.-Y., Kemfert, C., & Von Hirschhausen, C.
Affiliations
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Energy, Transport, and Environment, DIW Berlin, Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Workgroup for Infrastructure and Policy, TU Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Corresponding author
Löffler, Konstantin
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-09-22
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1468
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2759101754
Cited by
225
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Berlin
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
GENeSYS-MOD, OSeMOSYS, energy system optimization, CO2 emissions, decarbonization scenarios, modal split, energy storage, energy trade, renewable energy, photovoltaics, electricity generation costs, 1.5°C target, GAMS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review