The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed
Abstract
Numerical simulations using a fire model, FIRETEC, coupled to an atmospheric dynamics model, HIGRAD, are examined to investigate several fundamental aspects of fire behavior in grasslands, and specifically the dependence of this behavior on the ambient atmospheric winds and on the initial length of the fire line. The FIRETEC model is based on a multi‐phase transport approach, and incorporates representations of the physical processes that govern wildfires, such as combustion and radiative and convective heat exchange. Results from the coupled model show that the forward spread of the simulated fires increases with increasing ambient wind speed, and the spread rates are consistent with those observed in field experiments of grass fires; however, the forward spread also depends significantly on the initial length of the fire line, and for a given ambient wind speed the spread rate for long (100 m) lines is greater than that for short (16 m) lines. The spread of the simulated fires in the lateral direction also depends on the ambient wind speed and the length of the fire line, and a possible explanation for this effect is given. For weak ambient winds, the shape of the fire perimeter is dramatically different from that seen with higher wind speeds. The shape of the fire perimeter is also shown to depend on the initial length of the fire line. These differences in fire behavior are attributed to the differences in the nature of the coupled atmosphere–fire interactions among these cases, and are described in terms of the complex interplay between radiative and convective heat transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels
Rothermel, R. C. (1972) · doi:10.2737/int-rp-115 · Cited by 2,247
FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation
Finney, M. A. (1998) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-4 · Cited by 1,617
Cited by
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models
Sullivan, A. L. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06143 · Cited by 474
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models
Sullivan, A. L. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06142 · Cited by 408
Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires
Koo, E., Pagni, P. J., Weise, D. R., & Woycheese, J. P. (2010) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf07119 · Cited by 336
Linn, R. R., Sieg, C. H., Hoffman, C. M., Winterkamp, J. L., & McMillin, J. D. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.007 · Cited by 71
Self-citationBalch, J. K., Iglesias, V., Braswell, A. E., Rossi, M. W., Joseph, M. B., Mahood, A. L., Shrum, T. R., White, C. T., Scholl, V. M., McGuire, B., et al. (2020) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001319 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Linn, R. R., & Cunningham, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-07-06
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- D13
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083789510
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004jd005597
- The paper
- Linn, R. R., & Cunningham, P. (2005). Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.