The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data
Abstract
In the analyses of geodetic very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) and GPS data the analytic form used for mapping of the atmosphere delay from zenith to the line of site is most often a three‐parameter continued fraction in 1/sin(elevation). Using the 40 years reanalysis (ERA‐40) data of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts for the year 2001, the b and c coefficients of the continued fraction form for the hydrostatic mapping functions have been redetermined. Unlike previous mapping functions based on data from numerical weather models (isobaric mapping functions (Niell, 2000) and Vienna mapping functions (VMF) (Boehm and Schuh, 2004)), the new c coefficients are dependent on the day of the year, and unlike the Niell mapping functions (Niell, 1996) they are no longer symmetric with respect to the equator (apart from the opposite phase for the two hemispheres). Compared to VMF, this causes an effect on the VLBI or GPS station heights that is constant and as large as 2 mm at the equator and that varies seasonally between 4 mm and 0 mm at the poles. The updated VMF, based on these new coefficients and called VMF1 hereinafter, yields slightly better baseline length repeatabilities for VLBI data. The hydrostatic and wet mapping functions are applied in various combinations with different kinds of a priori zenith delays in the analyses of all VLBI International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS)‐R1 and IVS‐R4 24‐hour sessions of 2002 and 2003; the investigations concentrate on baseline length repeatabilities, as well as on absolute changes of station heights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame
Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X., & Métivier, L. (2011) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4 · Cited by 1,181
Drewes, H., Kuglitsch, F., Adám, J., & Rózsa, S. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z · Cited by 174
(2012) · International Association of Geodesy Symposia · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1 · Cited by 90
Intercontinental comparison of optical atomic clocks through very long baseline interferometry
Pizzocaro, M., Sekido, M., Takefuji, K., Ujihara, H., Hachisu, H., Nemitz, N., Tsutsumi, M., Kondo, T., Kawai, E., Ichikawa, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01038-6 · Cited by 64
Tarayoun, A., Mazzotti, S., Craymer, M., & Henton, J. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2017jb015417 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Boehm, J., Werl, B., & Schuh, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- B2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076413875
- Cited by
- 1,233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jb003629
- The paper
- Boehm, J., Werl, B., & Schuh, H. (2006). Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jb003629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.