The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts
Open accessAbstract
Inclusion of mineral dust radiative effects could lead to a significant improvement in the radiation balance of numerical weather prediction models with subsequent improvements in the weather forecast itself. In this study the radiative effects of mineral dust have been fully incorporated into a regional atmospheric dust model. Dust affects the radiative fluxes at the surface and the top of the atmosphere and the temperature profiles at every model time step when the radiation module is processed. These changes influence the atmospheric dynamics, moisture physics, and near‐surface conditions. Furthermore, dust emission is modified by changes in friction velocity and turbulent exchange coefficients; dust turbulent mixing, transport, and deposition are altered by changes in atmospheric stability, precipitation conditions, and free‐atmosphere winds. A major dust outbreak with dust optical depths reaching 3.5 at 550 nm over the Mediterranean region on April 2002 is selected to assess the radiative dust effects on the atmosphere at a regional level. A strong dust negative feedback upon dust emission (35–45% reduction of the AOD) resulted from the smaller outgoing sensible turbulent heat flux decreasing the turbulent momentum transfer from the atmosphere and consequently dust emission. Significant improvements of the atmospheric temperature and mean sea‐level pressure forecasts are obtained over dust‐affected areas by considerably reducing both warm and cold temperature biases existing in the model without dust‐radiation interactions. This study demonstrates that the use of the proposed model with integrated dust and atmospheric radiation represents a promising approach for further improvements in numerical weather prediction practice and radiative impact assessment over dust‐affected areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Janjić, Z. I. (1994) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:tsmecm>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,366
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles
Mishchenko, M. I., Lacis, A. A., & Travis, L. D. (2002) · Cited by 2,141
THE HITRAN MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPIC DATABASE AND HAWKS (HITRAN ATMOSPHERIC WORKSTATION): 1996 EDITION
ROTHMAN, L. S., RINSLAND, C. P., GOLDMAN, A., MASSIE, S. T., EDWARDS, D. P., FLAUD, J.-M., PERRIN, A., CAMY-PEYRET, C., DANA, V., MANDIN, J.-Y., et al. (1998) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00078-8 · Cited by 1,925
Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatology
Zender, C. S., Bian, H., & Newman, D. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002775 · Cited by 1,261
Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model
Janić, Z. I. (2001) · Cited by 1,241
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1998jd200048 · Cited by 939
Desert dust suppressing precipitation: A possible desertification feedback loop
Rosenfeld, D., Rudich, Y., & Lahav, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.101122798 · Cited by 795
The Step-Mountain Coordinate: Physical Package
Janjić, Z. I. (1990) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1429:tsmcpp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 787
Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381681a0 · Cited by 775
Cited by
Dust cycle: An emerging core theme in Earth system science
Shao, Y., Wyrwoll, K.-H., Chappell, A., Huang, J., Lin, Z., McTainsh, G. H., Mikami, M., Tanaka, T. Y., Wang, X., & Yoon, S. (2011) · Aeolian Research · doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,085
Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Zhang, X. C., Gong, S. L., Zhang, Y. M., & Sun, J. Y. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-779-2012 · Cited by 867
Knippertz, P., & Todd, M. C. (2012) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2011rg000362 · Cited by 406
The impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea
Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G., Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., & Bangalath, H. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-199-2015 · Cited by 294
Pérez, C., Haustein, K., Janjic, Z., Jorba, O., Huneeus, N., Baldasano, J. M., Black, T., Basart, S., Nickovic, S., Miller, R. L., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez, C., Nickovic, S., Pejanovic, G., Baldasano, J. M., & Özsoy, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-08-25
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- D16
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087240094
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006717
- The paper
- Pérez, C., Nickovic, S., Pejanovic, G., Baldasano, J. M., & Özsoy, E. (2006). Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006717
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.