Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts

Open access
Pérez, Carlos, Nickovic, Slobodan, Pejanovic, Goran, Baldasano, José María, Özsoy, Emin·2006·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Inclusion of mineral dust radiative effects could lead to a significant improvement in the radiation balance of numerical weather prediction models with subsequent improvements in the weather forecast itself. In this study the radiative effects of mineral dust have been fully incorporated into a regional atmospheric dust model. Dust affects the radiative fluxes at the surface and the top of the atmosphere and the temperature profiles at every model time step when the radiation module is processed. These changes influence the atmospheric dynamics, moisture physics, and near‐surface conditions. Furthermore, dust emission is modified by changes in friction velocity and turbulent exchange coefficients; dust turbulent mixing, transport, and deposition are altered by changes in atmospheric stability, precipitation conditions, and free‐atmosphere winds. A major dust outbreak with dust optical depths reaching 3.5 at 550 nm over the Mediterranean region on April 2002 is selected to assess the radiative dust effects on the atmosphere at a regional level. A strong dust negative feedback upon dust emission (35–45% reduction of the AOD) resulted from the smaller outgoing sensible turbulent heat flux decreasing the turbulent momentum transfer from the atmosphere and consequently dust emission. Significant improvements of the atmospheric temperature and mean sea‐level pressure forecasts are obtained over dust‐affected areas by considerably reducing both warm and cold temperature biases existing in the model without dust‐radiation interactions. This study demonstrates that the use of the proposed model with integrated dust and atmospheric radiation represents a promising approach for further improvements in numerical weather prediction practice and radiative impact assessment over dust‐affected areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jd006717

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Pérez, C., Nickovic, S., Pejanovic, G., Baldasano, J. M., & Özsoy, E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2006-08-25
Volume
111
Issue
D16
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087240094
Cited by
379
References
30
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006717
The paper
Pérez, C., Nickovic, S., Pejanovic, G., Baldasano, J. M., & Özsoy, E. (2006). Interactive dust‐radiation modeling: A step to improve weather forecasts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006717

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.