Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing snow and shrub conditions affect albedo with global implications

Open access
Sturm, Matthew, Douglas, Tom, Racine, Charles, Liston, Glen E.·2005·Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

Abstract

Observations suggest that shrub abundance in the Arctic is increasing owing to climate warming. We investigated the ramifications of a tundra‐to‐shrubland transition on winter energy exchange. At five sites in Alaska we suspended a 50‐m‐long cable above the vegetation and from this measured how the vegetation interacted with the snow and affected albedo. The sites defined a gradient from nearly shrub‐free tundra to a woodland with a continuous shrub canopy. Where the shrubs were small, thin‐stemmed, and supple, they were bent and buried by snow. Where they were tall, thick‐stemmed, and stiff, the shrub canopy remained exposed all winter. Where shrubs were buried, mid‐winter albedo values were high (0.85), but where they were exposed, the values were 30% lower (0.60). At these latter sites, melting began several weeks earlier but proceeded more slowly. Consequently, all sites were free of snow about the same time. Using the measurements and a solar model, we estimate that a land surface transition from shrub‐free tundra to shrubland could produce a 69 to 75% increase in absorbed solar radiation during the snow‐cover period, depending on latitude. This is two thirds the increase associated with a tundra‐to‐forest transition. When combined with measurements showing that a tundra‐to‐shrub transition would also produce a net increase in summer heating, our results suggest a positive feedback mechanism associated with a warming‐induced increase in shrubs. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to document that shrubs could alter the winter energy balance of tundra in such a substantial way.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2005jg000013

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Sturm, M., Douglas, T., Racine, C., & Liston, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Published
2005-09
Volume
110
Issue
G1
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066955787
Cited by
332
References
37
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing snow and shrub conditions affect albedo with global implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jg000013
The paper
Sturm, M., Douglas, T., Racine, C., & Liston, G. E. (2005). Changing snow and shrub conditions affect albedo with global implications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jg000013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.