Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How cold was the Last Glacial Maximum?

Schneider von Deimling, Thomas, Ganopolski, Andrey, Held, Hermann, Rahmstorf, Stefan·2006·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

We present a new approach to estimate the magnitude of global‐mean cooling (dT LGM) at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) relative to the pre‐industrial climate, by combining an ensemble of coupled climate model simulations with empirical constraints on regional cooling inferred from proxy data. We have generated a large ensemble of paired runs (∼100) for pre‐industrial and LGM boundary conditions with different versions of the same climate model of intermediate complexity. The model ensemble covers a broad range of climate sensitivities and produces a similarly broad range of dT LGM (4.3–9.8°C). Using reconstructed tropical SST cooling, we constrain the range of dT LGM to 5.8 ± 1.4°C, which is corroborated by proxy data from other regions. This cooling is considerably larger than most estimates of previous LGM simulations. The reason is that most models did not account for the effect of atmospheric dust content and vegetation changes, which yield an additional 1.0–1.7°C global cooling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gl026484

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Schneider von Deimling, T., Ganopolski, A., Held, H., & Rahmstorf, S.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2006-07
Volume
33
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1973185755
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How cold was the Last Glacial Maximum? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006gl026484
The paper
Schneider von Deimling, T., Ganopolski, A., Held, H., & Rahmstorf, S. (2006). How cold was the Last Glacial Maximum? Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026484

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.