Cited by 168Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMarine and fisheries researchMarine and coastal ecosystems

Delayed coastal upwelling along the U.S. West Coast in 2005: A historical perspective

Schwing, Franklin B., Bond, Nicholas A., Bograd, Steven J., Mitchell, Todd, Alexander, Michael A., Mantua, Nathan·2006·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The timing of the onset of coastal upwelling in spring and its intensity over the upwelling season are critical factors in the productivity and structure of the California Current ecosystem (CCE). We use an index of coastal upwelling to characterize physical forcing over the latitudinal extent of the CCE, and compare the evolution of the upwelling season in 2005 with previous years. The onset of coastal upwelling in 2005 in the northern California Current was delayed by 2–3 months. Upwelling was stronger than normal in the latter part of the upwelling season, allowing the cumulative upwelling to reach the climatological mean by fall. Although physical conditions were unusual in 2005, they were not unprecedented in the historical record. However, the timing and strength of coastal upwelling is a critical ecological factor, particularly for species whose life histories are closely tuned to the annual cycle. The unusual physical and biological conditions observed in spring 2005 illustrate the sensitivity of the CCE to possible future climate extremes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gl026911

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2005 in the California Current, a significant delay in the spring transition appears to have led to ecosystem changes affecting primary production, zooplankton, fish, birds, and mammals.

    “This was particularly evident in 2005 in the California Current, when a significant delay in the spring transition [77,78] appears to have led to ecosystem changes affecting primary production [79], to zooplankton [80], to fish, birds, and mammals [81][82][83].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwing, F. B., Bond, N. A., Bograd, S. J., Mitchell, T., Alexander, M. A., & Mantua, N.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Schwing, Franklin B.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2006-10-07
Volume
33
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2143348722
Cited by
168
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
coastal upwelling, California Current Ecosystem, upwelling index, climate extremes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review