Cited by 191Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewMarine and fisheries research

Planktivorous auklet Ptychoramphus aleuticus responses to ocean climate, 2005: Unusual atmospheric blocking?

Sydeman, William J., Bradley, Russell W., Warzybok, Pete, Abraham, Christine L., Jahncke, Jaime, Hyrenbach, K. David, Kousky, Vernon, Hipfner, J. Mark +1 more·2006·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

In spring‐summer 2005, anomalous atmospheric‐oceanographic coupling caused unprecedented reproductive failures and redistribution of a planktivorous marine bird in both central California (37°N) and southern British Columbia (50°N). At SE Farallon Island, CA, the birds abandoned the breeding colony en masse between 10–20 May, a unique behavioral response; for the first time in 35 years, reproductive success was zero. At Triangle Island, B.C., only 8% of the nesting pairs were successful, the worst year on record. Surveys of birds at sea revealed a peak in relative abundance south of Point Conception (34°N) in summer and fall, suggestive of emigration from the north. Prey (euphausiid crustacean) biomass in the Gulf of the Farallones was reduced, but remained high south of Point Conception. Change in predator and prey may be explained, in part, by unusual atmospheric blocking in the Gulf of Alaska in May, which caused the jet stream to shift southwards resulting in poor upwelling‐favorable winds and anomalously warm SST. This study demonstrates the deleterious consequences of this climate event for a top marine predator in the central‐northern California Current System.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006gl026736

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upper trophic level marine species serve as excellent indicators (high signal-to-noise ratio) of climate-ecosystem shifts.

    “and therefore, they serve as excellent indicators (high signal-to-noise ratio) of climate-ecosystem shifts [82].”
  • The match-mismatch hypothesis has been applied to cod stocks in the North Sea and salmon and seabirds in California.

    “and has been applied to cod stocks in the North Sea [90] as well as salmon and seabirds in California [82,91].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sydeman, W. J., Bradley, R. W., Warzybok, P., Abraham, C. L., Jahncke, J., Hyrenbach, K. D., Kousky, V., Hipfner, J. M., & Ohman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Point Blue Conservation Science (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2006-10-21
Volume
33
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2164037590
Cited by
191
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Ptychoramphus aleuticus, reproductive failure, atmospheric blocking, ocean climate variability, upwelling, sea surface temperature, Gulf of the Farallones, California Current System, emigration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review