The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcán Alcedo, Galápagos
Abstract
While conventional interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a very effective technique for measuring crustal deformation, almost any interferogram includes large areas where the signals decorrelate and no measurement is possible. Persistent scatterer (PS) InSAR overcomes the decorrelation problem by identifying resolution elements whose echo is dominated by a single scatterer in a series of interferograms. Existing PS methods have been very successful in analysis of urban areas, where stable angular structures produce efficient reflectors that dominate background scattering. However, man‐made structures are absent from most of the Earth's surface. Furthermore, existing methods identify PS pixels based on the similarity of their phase history to an assumed model for how deformation varies with time, whereas characterizing the temporal pattern of deformation is commonly one of the aims of any deformation study. We describe here a method for PS analysis, StaMPS, that uses spatial correlation of interferogram phase to find pixels with low‐phase variance in all terrains, with or without buildings. Prior knowledge of temporal variations in the deformation rate is not required for their identification. We apply StaMPS to Volcán Alcedo, where conventional InSAR fails because of dense vegetation on the upper volcano flanks that causes most pixels to decorrelate with time. We detect two sources of deformation. The first we model as a contracting pipe‐like body, which we interpret to be a crystallizing magma chamber. The second is downward and lateral motion on the inner slopes of the caldera, which we interpret as landsliding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Cited by
Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem
Guzzetti, F., Mondini, A. C., Cardinali, M., Fiorucci, F., Santangelo, M., & Chang, K.-T. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,092
A multi‐temporal InSAR method incorporating both persistent scatterer and small baseline approaches
Hooper, A. (2008) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2008gl034654 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationImproving InSAR geodesy using Global Atmospheric Models
Jolivet, R., Agram, P. S., Lin, N. Y., Simons, M., Doin, M., Peltzer, G., & Li, Z. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2013jb010588 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooper, A., Segall, P., & Zebker, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- B7
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013211795
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcán Alcedo, Galápagos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jb004763
- The paper
- Hooper, A., Segall, P., & Zebker, H. (2007). Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcán Alcedo, Galápagos. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.