Cited by 2,721Climate variability and modelsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection

Ashok, Karumuri, Behera, Swadhin K., Rao, Suryachandra A., Weng, Hengyi, Yamagata, Toshio·2007·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Using observed data sets mainly for the period 1979–2005, we find that anomalous warming events different from conventional El Niño events occur in the central equatorial Pacific. This unique warming in the central equatorial Pacific associated with a horseshoe pattern is flanked by a colder sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) on both sides along the equator. empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of monthly tropical Pacific SSTA shows that these events are represented by the second mode that explains 12% of the variance. Since a majority of such events are not part of El Niño evolution, the phenomenon is named as El Niño Modoki (pseudo‐El Niño) (“Modoki” is a classical Japanese word, which means “a similar but different thing”). The El Niño Modoki involves ocean‐atmosphere coupled processes which include a unique tripolar sea level pressure pattern during the evolution, analogous to the Southern Oscillation in the case of El Niño. Hence the total entity is named as El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Modoki. The ENSO Modoki events significantly influence the temperature and precipitation over many parts of the globe. Depending on the season, the impacts over regions such as the Far East including Japan, New Zealand, western coast of United States, etc., are opposite to those of the conventional ENSO. The difference maps between the two periods of 1979–2004 and 1958–1978 for various oceanic/atmospheric variables suggest that the recent weakening of equatorial easterl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2006jc003798

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past research has shown significant decadal variability in the frequency of noncanonical El Niños relative to canonical events.

    “Past research has shown significant decadal variability in the frequency of noncanonical El Niños relative to canonical events.”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Ashok et al., 2007

  • During a Modoki El Niño, warm SST anomalies are often accompanied by anomalously cold SSTs to the east and west, forming a distinctive horseshoe pattern.

    “During a Modoki El Niño, warm SST anomalies are often accompanied by anomalously cold SSTs to the east and west, forming a distinctive horseshoe pattern [Ashok et al., 2007].”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Ashok et al., 2007

  • SST and surface wind anomalies are much weaker for Modoki compared to canonical.

    “SST and surface wind anomalies are much weaker for Modoki compared to canonical, consistent with previous results [Ashok et al., 2007].”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Ashok et al., 2007

  • Recent studies indicate a growing frequency of Modoki ENSO events relative to canonical events in recent years.

    “Recent studies indicate a growing frequency of Modoki ENSO events relative to canonical events in recent years [Yeh et al., 2009;Ashok et al., 2007;Kao and Yu, 2009;Kug et al., 2009;Lee and McPhaden, 2010].”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Ashok et al., 2007

  • ENSO SST variability underpins consequential ENSO-related climate variability and climate extremes within and outside the Pacific.

    “Because ENSO SST variability underpins consequential ENSO-related climate variability and climate extremes within and outside the Pacific 6,11,12 , how ENSO SST variability might respond to greenhouse warming is a fundamental issue in climate change science 7,9,13 , with critical societal ramifications.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashok, K., Behera, S. K., Rao, S. A., Weng, H., & Yamagata, T.
Affiliations
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2007-11
Volume
112
Issue
C11
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090029279
Cited by
2,721
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 177 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 198 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 141 · 2014: 158 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 128
FWCI
35.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
El Niño Modoki, ENSO Modoki, sea surface temperature anomalies, Southern Oscillation, teleconnections, precipitation anomalies, equatorial easterlies, ocean-atmosphere interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review