Cited by 898Climate variability and modelsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchClimate Change and Environmental Impact

ENSO and greenhouse warming

Open access
Cai, Wenju, Santoso, Agus, Wang, Guojian, Yeh, Sang-Wook, An, Soon-Il, Cobb, Kim M., Collins, Mat, Guilyardi, Eric +9 more·2015·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2743

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies based on CMIP5 models alone, or on a combination of CMIP5 and a smaller set of earlier available CMIP6 models, have found that models better simulating ENSO dynamics tend to generate increased ENSO SST variability.

    “Studies based on CMIP5 models alone, or on a combination of CMIP5 and a smaller set of earlier available CMIP6 models 9,10 , have found that models better simulating ENSO dynamics tend to generate increased ENSO SST variability.”
  • There was a lack of inter-model consensus among CMIP5 models unless model selection was applied on the basis of the realism of the simulated ENSO.

    “There was a lack of inter-model consensus among available models that participated in the previous instalments of CMIP5, unless model selection was applied on the basis of the realism of the simulated ENSO 9,10 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, W., Santoso, A., Wang, G., Yeh, S.-W., An, S.-I., Cobb, K. M., Collins, M., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F.-F., Kug, J.-S., Lengaigne, M., McPhaden, M. J., Takahashi, K., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G., Watanabe, M., & Wu, L.
Affiliations
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Instituto Geofísico del Perú (PE)
  • Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Ocean University of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Cai, Wenju
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2015-08-17
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
849-859
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W1665721417
Cited by
891
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 7
FWCI
54.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (ncas10009, NE/I022841/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26247079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
ENSO, global warming, Walker circulation, extreme El Niño, ocean warming, extreme weather events, climate model bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review