The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2
Abstract
Measurements of carbonyl sulfide (COS) from a global air‐monitoring network over multiple years suggest that atmospheric mixing ratios of COS are strongly influenced by terrestrial vegetation in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and by the oceans in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). The annual mean NH mixing ratio estimated from results at seven surface sites during 2000.2–2005.2 was 476 ± 4 ppt, or slightly less than the mean of 491 ± 2 ppt derived from results at three surface sites in the SH. The lowest annual mean mixing ratios were measured at low‐altitude continental sites in the midlatitude and high‐latitude NH. Mixing ratios undergo substantial seasonal variations at nearly all sites across the globe; the largest seasonal variations are observed at the NH sites having the lowest annual means. There is little coherence in the seasonality in the NH and SH, suggesting that the COS seasonality is driven by different processes in each hemisphere. These seasonal changes cause the NH/SH ratio, as estimated from the available surface data, to vary regularly from 0.91 ± 0.01 to 1.04 ± 0.02 across a year; the annual mean NH/SH ratio was 0.97 ± 0.01. Results from over 160 aircraft profiles regularly collected at eight sites over the continental United States throughout an entire year reveal substantial vertical gradients for COS mixing ratios that vary with season. While similar mixing ratios are observed throughout the NH troposphere during January–April (up to 8 km above sea level (asl)), during the growing season substantially reduced mixing ratios are observed in the boundary layer above the continental United States (defined here as <2 km asl). The surface and aircraft results for COS show strong similarities to atmospheric CO 2, though both the amplitude of seasonal variations measured at Earth's surface and the observed vertical gradients during the growing season are 5–6 times larger for COS than for CO 2 on a relative basis. A qualitative analysis of the results in light of known sources and sinks suggests (1) that terrestrial uptake, most likely due to photosynthetically active vegetation, dominates the seasonality observed throughout the Northern Hemisphere at a rate that is about 5 times greater than estimates based upon scaling net primary production by mean, ambient air mixing ratios of COS to CO 2, (2) the oceans dominate the seasonality observed in the Southern Hemisphere, and (3) biomass burning has a small influence on the seasonality observed for COS in the extratropics of both hemispheres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning
Andreae, M. O., & Merlet, P. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001382 · Cited by 3,902
The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., GOULDEN, M. L., Heimann, M., Jaramillo, V. J., Kheshgi, H. S., Quéré, C. L., Scholes, R. J., Wallace, D. W. R., et al. (2001) · HAL · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationConway, T. J., Tans, P. P., Waterman, L. S., Thoning, K. W., Kitzis, D. R., Masarie, K. A., & Zhang, N. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/94jd01951 · Cited by 787
Self-citationFalge, E., Baldocchi, D., Tenhunen, J., Aubinet, M., Bakwin, P., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Burba, G., Clement, R., Davis, K. J., et al. (2002) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00102-8 · Cited by 710
Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Staudt, A. C., Yevich, R., & Logan, J. A. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002378 · Cited by 698
The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide
Watts, S. F. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00342-8 · Cited by 487
Randerson, J. T., Thompson, M. V., Conway, T. J., Fung, I. Y., & Field, C. B. (1997) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/97gb02268 · Cited by 455
Self-citationVegetation effects on the isotope composition of oxygen in atmospheric CO2
Farquhar, G. D., Lloyd, J., Taylor, J. A., Flanagan, L. B., Syvertsen, J. P., Hubick, K. T., Wong, S. C., & Ehleringer, J. R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363439a0 · Cited by 417
Global sources and sinks of OCS and CS2and their distributions
Chin, M., & Davis, D. D. (1993) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/93gb00568 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Stratospheric aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., et al. (2016) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2015rg000511 · Cited by 578
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols
Rasch, P. J., Tilmes, S., Turco, R. P., Robock, A., Oman, L., Chen, C.-C. (., Stenchikov, G. L., & Garcia, R. R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0131 · Cited by 326
Feinberg, A., Sukhodolov, T., Luo, B.-P., Rozanov, E., Winkel, L. H. E., Peter, T., & Stenke, A. (2019) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-12-3863-2019 · Cited by 84
Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012
Brodowsky, C., Sukhodolov, T., Feinberg, A., Höpfner, M., Peter, T., Stenke, A., & Rozanov, E. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035472 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Montzka, S. A., Calvert, P., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., Conway, T. J., Tans, P. P., & Sweeney, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-05-03
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- D9
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001084454
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2006jd007665
- The paper
- Montzka, S. A., Calvert, P., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., Conway, T. J., Tans, P. P., & Sweeney, C. (2007). On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.