Cited by 330Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols

Rasch, Philip J, Tilmes, Simone, Turco, Richard P, Robock, Alan, Oman, Luke, Chen, Chih-Chieh (Jack), Stenchikov, Georgiy L, Garcia, Rolando R·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

We provide an overview of geoengineering by stratospheric sulphate aerosols. The state of understanding about this topic as of early 2008 is reviewed, summarizing the past 30 years of work in the area, highlighting some very recent studies using climate models, and discussing methods used to deliver sulphur species to the stratosphere. The studies reviewed here suggest that sulphate aerosols can counteract the globally averaged temperature increase associated with increasing greenhouse gases, and reduce changes to some other components of the Earth system. There are likely to be remaining regional climate changes after geoengineering, with some regions experiencing significant changes in temperature or precipitation. The aerosols also serve as surfaces for heterogeneous chemistry resulting in increased ozone depletion. The delivery of sulphur species to the stratosphere in a way that will produce particles of the right size is shown to be a complex and potentially very difficult task. Two simple delivery scenarios are explored, but similar exercises will be needed for other suggested delivery mechanisms. While the introduction of the geoengineering source of sulphate aerosol will perturb the sulphur cycle of the stratosphere signicantly, it is a small perturbation to the total (stratosphere and troposphere) sulphur cycle. The geoengineering source would thus be a small contributor to the total global source of ‘acid rain’ that could be compensated for through improved pollution control of anthropogenic tropospheric sources. Some areas of research remain unexplored. Although ozone may be depleted, with a consequent increase to solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) energy reaching the surface and a potential impact on health and biological populations, the aerosols will also scatter and attenuate this part of the energy spectrum, and this may compensate the UVB enhancement associated with ozone depletion. The aerosol will also change the ratio of diffuse to direct energy reaching the surface, and this may influence ecosystems. The impact of geoengineering on these components of the Earth system has not yet been studied. Representations for the formation, evolution and removal of aerosol and distribution of particle size are still very crude, and more work will be needed to gain confidence in our understanding of the deliberate production of this class of aerosols and their role in the climate system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2008.0131

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary candidate methods for geoengineering are marine cloud brightening, cirrus thinning, and stratospheric aerosol injection.

    “The primary candidate methods for geoengineering are marine cloud brightening [396] (making low-lying clouds more reflective), cirrus thinning [759] (making high-flying clouds trap less heat), and stratospheric aerosol injection [668] (which we discuss below).”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [668]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasch, P. J., Tilmes, S., Turco, R. P., Robock, A., Oman, L., Chen, C.-C. (., Stenchikov, G. L., & Garcia, R. R.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Center for Atmospheric ResearchPO Box 3000-80307, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Corresponding author
Rasch, Philip J
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2008-08-29
Volume
366
Issue
1882
Pages
4007-4037
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2118726619
Cited by
326
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
solar geoengineering, sulphur cycle, climate change mitigation, global warming, ozone depletion, UV-B radiation, acid rain, aerosol particle size, regional climate impacts, precipitation change
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Atmosphere, Climate, Conservation of Natural Resources, Disasters, Engineering, Sulfates, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review