The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On soil moisture–vegetation feedbacks and their possible effects on the dynamics of dryland ecosystems
Abstract
Soil moisture is the environmental variable synthesizing the effect of climate, soil, and vegetation on the dynamics of water‐limited ecosystems. Unlike abiotic factors (e.g., soil texture and rainfall regime), the control exerted by vegetation composition and structure on soil moisture variability remains poorly understood. A number of field studies in dryland landscapes have found higher soil water contents in vegetated soil patches than in adjacent bare soil, providing a convincing explanation for the observed preferential establishment of grasses and seedlings beneath tree canopies. Thus, because water is the limiting factor for vegetation in arid and semiarid ecosystems, a positive feedback could exist between soil moisture and woody vegetation dynamics. It is still unclear how the strength of such a feedback would change under different long‐term rainfall regimes. To this end, we report some field observations from savanna ecosystems located along the south‐north rainfall gradient in the Kalahari, where the presence of relatively uniform sandy soils limits the effects of covarying factors. The data available from our field study suggest that the contrast between the soil moisture in the canopy and intercanopy space increases (with wetter soils under the canopy) with increasing levels of aridity. We hypothesize that this contrast may lead to a positive feedback and explore the implications of such a feedback in a minimalistic model. We found that when the feedback is relatively strong, the system may exhibit two stable states corresponding to conditions with and without tree canopy cover. In this case, even small changes in environmental variables may lead to rapid and largely irreversible shifts to a state with no tree canopy cover. Our data suggest that the tendency of the system to exhibit two (alternative) stable states becomes stronger in the more arid regions. Thus, at the desert margins, vegetation is more likely to be prone to discontinuous and abrupt state changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation.
Scanlon, T. M., Caylor, K. K., Levin, S. A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06060 · Cited by 404
Self-citationLocalized vegetation patches: a self-organized response to resource scarcity.
Lejeune, O., Tlidi, M., & Couteron, P. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.010901 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O., Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G., Lawrence, P. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13910 · Cited by 768
Nicholson, S. E. (2013) · ISRN Meteorology · doi:10.1155/2013/453521 · Cited by 742
Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges
(2017) · Springer Series on Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2 · Cited by 197
Groundwater and Remotely Sensed Phenology Reveal Vulnerability of Riparian Trees to Drought
Mohammadi, R. M., Dawson, T. E., Tiedeman, C. R., Stella, J. C., & Ruhí, A. (2025) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.70564 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Odorico, P., Caylor, K., Okin, G. S., & Scanlon, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- G4
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993908563
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.