Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC)

Zaveri, Rahul A., Easter, Richard C., Fast, Jerome D., Peters, Leonard K.·2008·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

This paper describes and evaluates a new Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), with a special focus on addressing the long‐standing issues in solving the dynamic partitioning of semivolatile inorganic gases (HNO 3, HCl, and NH 3) to size‐distributed atmospheric aerosol particles. The coupled ordinary differential equations (ODE) for dynamic gas‐particle mass transfer are extremely stiff, and the available numerical techniques are either very expensive or produce oscillatory solutions. These limitations are overcome in MOSAIC with a new dynamic gas‐particle partitioning module, which is coupled to an efficient and accurate thermodynamics module. The algorithm includes a new concept of “dynamic pH,” a novel formulation for mass transfer to mixed‐phase and solid particles, and an adaptive time stepping scheme, which together hold the key to smooth, accurate, and efficient solutions of gas‐particle partitioning over the entire relative humidity range. MOSAIC is found to be in excellent agreement with a benchmark version of the model that uses a rigorous solver for integrating the stiff ODEs. The steady‐state MOSAIC results for monodisperse aerosol test cases are also in excellent agreement with those obtained with the benchmark equilibrium model AIM. Moreover, the CPU times required for fully dynamic solutions by MOSAIC per size bin per 5 min intervals (typical 3‐D model time steps) are similar to those for bulk equilibrium solutions by the computationally efficient but relatively less accurate model ISORROPIA. These results show that MOSAIC is extremely efficient without compromising accuracy, and is therefore highly attractive for use in air quality and regional/global aerosol models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jd008782

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,347

Metadata

Authors
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., & Peters, L. K.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2008-07-03
Volume
113
Issue
D13
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072692927
Cited by
1,347
References
3
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd008782
The paper
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., & Peters, L. K. (2008). Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008782

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.