Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources

Open access
Xiao, Yaping, Logan, Jennifer A., Jacob, Daniel J., Hudman, Rynda C., Yantosca, Robert, Blake, Donald R.·2008·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We use a 3‐D chemical transport model (the GEOS‐Chem CTM) to evaluate a global emission inventory for ethane (C 2 H 6), with a best estimate for the global source of 13 Tg yr−1, 8.0 Tg yr−1 from fossil fuel production, 2.6 Tg yr−1 from biofuel, and 2.4 Tg yr−1 from biomass burning. About 80% of the source is emitted in the Northern Hemisphere. The model generally provides a reasonable and unbiased simulation of surface air observations, column measurements, and aircraft profiles worldwide, including patterns of geographical and seasonal variability. The main bias is a 20%–30% overestimate at European surface sites. Propagation of the C 2 H 6 seasonal signal from northern midlatitudes to the equatorial western Pacific and the southern tropics demonstrates the dominance of northern midlatitudes as a source of C 2 H 6 worldwide. Interhemispheric transport provides the largest C 2 H 6 source to the Southern Hemisphere (1.7 Tg yr−1), and southern biomass burning provides the other major source (1.0 Tg yr−1). The C 2 H 6 emission inventory for the United States from the Environmental Protection Agency (0.6 Tg yr−1) is considerably lower than our estimate constrained by extensive aircraft observations in the continental boundary layer (2.4 Tg yr−1). This appears to reflect a factor 7 underestimate in the fossil fuel source over the south‐central United States. Our estimate of C 2 H 6 emissions, together with observed ratios of CH 4:C 2 H 6, suggests that CH 4 emissions from energy production in the U.S. may be underestimated by as much as 50%–100%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007jd009415

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, Y., Logan, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Hudman, R. C., Yantosca, R., & Blake, D. R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2008-11-05
Volume
113
Issue
D21
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103747864
Cited by
257
References
1
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd009415
The paper
Xiao, Y., Logan, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Hudman, R. C., Yantosca, R., & Blake, D. R. (2008). Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009415

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.