The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources
Open accessAbstract
We use a 3‐D chemical transport model (the GEOS‐Chem CTM) to evaluate a global emission inventory for ethane (C 2 H 6), with a best estimate for the global source of 13 Tg yr−1, 8.0 Tg yr−1 from fossil fuel production, 2.6 Tg yr−1 from biofuel, and 2.4 Tg yr−1 from biomass burning. About 80% of the source is emitted in the Northern Hemisphere. The model generally provides a reasonable and unbiased simulation of surface air observations, column measurements, and aircraft profiles worldwide, including patterns of geographical and seasonal variability. The main bias is a 20%–30% overestimate at European surface sites. Propagation of the C 2 H 6 seasonal signal from northern midlatitudes to the equatorial western Pacific and the southern tropics demonstrates the dominance of northern midlatitudes as a source of C 2 H 6 worldwide. Interhemispheric transport provides the largest C 2 H 6 source to the Southern Hemisphere (1.7 Tg yr−1), and southern biomass burning provides the other major source (1.0 Tg yr−1). The C 2 H 6 emission inventory for the United States from the Environmental Protection Agency (0.6 Tg yr−1) is considerably lower than our estimate constrained by extensive aircraft observations in the continental boundary layer (2.4 Tg yr−1). This appears to reflect a factor 7 underestimate in the fossil fuel source over the south‐central United States. Our estimate of C 2 H 6 emissions, together with observed ratios of CH 4:C 2 H 6, suggests that CH 4 emissions from energy production in the U.S. may be underestimated by as much as 50%–100%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Light nonmethane hydrocarbons in seawater
Plass‐Dülmer, C., Koppmann, R., Ratte, M., & Rudolph, J. (1995) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb02416 · Cited by 107
Cited by
The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001882 · Cited by 613
Self-citationAtmospheric peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): A global budget and source attribution
Fischer, E. V., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Millet, D. B., Mao, J., Paulot, F., Singh, H. B., Roiger, A., Ries, L., et al. (2014) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-14-2679-2014 · Cited by 390
Self-citationMonks, S. A., Wilson, C., Emmons, L. K., Hannigan, J. W., Helmig, D., Blake, N. J., & Blake, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2017jd028112 · Cited by 28
Self-citationTuccella, P., Thomas, J. L., Law, K. S., Raut, J.-C., Marelle, L., Roiger, A., Weinzierl, B., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Schlager, H., & Onishi, T. (2017) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.124 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, Y., Logan, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Hudman, R. C., Yantosca, R., & Blake, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-11-05
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- D21
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103747864
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007jd009415
- The paper
- Xiao, Y., Logan, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Hudman, R. C., Yantosca, R., & Blake, D. R. (2008). Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on U.S. sources. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.