CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues

Air pollution impacts due to petroleum extraction in the Norwegian Sea during the ACCESS aircraft campaign

Open access
Tuccella, P., Thomas, J. L., Law, K. S., Raut, J.-C., Marelle, L., Roiger, A., Weinzierl, B., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C. +2 more·2017·Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
DOI 10.1525/elementa.124
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Emissions from oil/gas extraction activities in the Arctic are already important in certain regions and may increase as global warming opens up new opportunities for industrial development. Emissions from oil/gas extraction are sources of air pollutants, but large uncertainties exist with regard to their amounts and composition. In this study, we focus on detailed investigation of emissions from oil/gas extraction in the Norwegian Sea combining measurements from the EU ACCESS aircraft campaign in July 2012 and regional chemical transport modeling. The goal is to (1) evaluate emissions from petroleum extraction activities and (2) investigate their impact on atmospheric composition over the Norwegian Sea. Numerical simulations include emissions for permanently operating offshore facilities from two datasets: the TNO-MACC inventory and emissions reported by Norwegian Environment Agency (NEA). It was necessary to additionally estimate primary aerosol emissions using reported emission factors since these emissions are not included in the inventories for our sites. Model runs with the TNO-MACC emissions are unable to reproduce observations close to the facilities. Runs using the NEA emissions more closely reproduce the observations although emissions from mobile facilities are missing from this inventory. Measured plumes suggest they are a significant source of pollutants, in particular NOx and aerosols. Sensitivities to NOx and NMVOC emissions show that, close to the platforms, O3 is sensitive to NOx emissions and is much less sensitive to NMVOC emissions. O3 destruction, via reaction with NO, dominates very close to the platforms. Far from the platforms, oil/gas facility emissions result in an average daytime O3 enhancement of +2% at the surface. Larger enhancements are predicted at noon ranging from +7% at the surface to +15% at 600 m. Black carbon is the aerosol species most strongly influenced by petroleum extraction emissions. The results highlight significant uncertainties in emissions related to petroleum extraction emissions in the Arctic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/elementa.124

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data analysis and subsequent modeling show that offshore oil and gas activities produce a range of emissions, linked not only to oil and gas production (flaring, venting) but also from stationary mobile sources, such as storage tankers and drilling rigs, and shuttle tankers, and power generation on the platforms.

    “Data analysis and subsequent modeling show that these activities produce a range of emissions, linked not only to oil and gas production ( fl aring, venting) but also from stationary mobile sources, such as storage tankers and drilling rigs, and shuttle tankers, and power generation on the platforms (Roiger et al., 2015; Tuccella et al., 2017).”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Tuccella et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In a model assessment, Tuccella et al. (2017) showed that background ozone and aerosol concentrations are influenced by emissions downwind of the platforms in the southern Norwegian Sea.

    “In a model assessment, Tuccella et al. (2017) showed that background ozone and aerosol concentrations are in fl uenced by emissions downwind of the platforms in this region.”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Tuccella et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Ackermann, IJ, Hass, H, Memmesheimer, Ebel, A, Binkowski, FS and Shankar, U 1998 Modal aerosol dynamics model for Europe: Development and first allpications, Atmos. Environ., 32(17): 2981-2999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00006-5 · DOI
  2. Ahmadov, R, McKeen, SA, Robinson, A, Bahreini, R, Middlebrook, A, de Gouw, J, Meagher, J, Hsie, E, Edgerton, E, Shaw, S and Trainer, M 2012 A volatility basis set model for summertime secondary organic aerosols over the eastern United States in 2006, J. Geophys. Res., 117(D06): 301. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016831 · DOI
  3. Ahmadov, R, McKeen, S, Trainer, M, Banta, R, Brewer, A, Brown, S, Edwards, PM, de Gouw, JA, Frost, GJ, Gilman, J, Helmig, D, Johnson, B, Karion, A, Koss, A, Langford, A, Lerner, B, Olson, J, Oltmans, S, Peischl, J, Pétron, G, Pichugina, Y, Roberts, JM, Ryerson, T, Schnell, R, Senff, C, Sweeney, C, Thompson, C, Veres, PR, Warneke, C, Wild, R, Williams, EJ, Yuan, B and Zamora, R 2015 Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil-and natural gas-producing region of the western US, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 15: 411-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-411-2015 AMAP: Assessment 2007 Oil and Gas in the Arctic: Effects and Potential effects, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brock, CA, Wagner, NL, Anderson, BE, Beyersdorf, A, Campuzano-Jost, P, Day, DA, Diskin, GS, Gordon, TD, Jimenez, JL, Lack, DA, Liao, J, Markovic, MZ, Middlebrook, AM, Perring, AE, Richardson, MS, Schwarz, JP, Welti, A, Ziemba, LD and Murphy, DM 2016 Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer -Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16: 5009-5019. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016 · DOI
  5. Carter, WPL and Seinfeld, JH 2012 Winter ozone formation and VOC incremental reactivities in the Upper Green River Basin of Wyoming, Atmos. Environ, 50: 255-266. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.025 · DOI
  6. Chen, F and Dudhia, J 2001 Coupling an advanced land- surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system, Part I: Model description and implementation, Mon. Weather Rev, 129: 569-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493 · DOI
  7. Eckhardt, S, Hermansen, O, Grythe, H, Fiebig, M, Stebel, K, Cassiani, M, Baecklund, A and Stohl, A 2013 The influence of cruise ship emissions on air pollution in Svalbard -a harbinger of a more polluted Arctic? Atmos. Chem. Phys, 13: 8401-8409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8401-2013 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Edwards, PM, Young, CJ, Aikin, K, deGouw, J, Dubé, WP, Geiger, F, Gilman, J, Helmig, D, Holloway, JS, Kercher, J, Lerner, B, Martin, R, McLaren, R, Parrish, DD, Peischl, J, Roberts, JM, Ryerson, TB, Thornton, J, Warneke, C, Williams, EJ and Brown, SS 2013 Ozone photochemistry in an oil and natural gas extraction region during winter: simulations of a snow-free season in the Uintah Basin, Utah, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 13: 8955-8971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8955-2013 · DOI
  9. Elleman, RA and Covert, DS 2010 Aerosol size distribution modeling with the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system in the Pacific Northwest: 3. Size distribution of particles emitted into a mesoscale model, J. Geophys. Res, 115: D03204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012401 · DOI
  10. Emmons, LK, Walters, S, Hess, PG, Lamarque, J-F, Pfister, GG, Fillmore, D, Granier, C, Guenther, A, Kinnison, D, Laepple, T, Orlando, J, Tie, X, Tyndall, G, Wiedinmyer, C, Baughcum, SL and Kloster, S 2010 Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev, 3: 43-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010 · DOI
  11. Erisman, JW, Vanpul, A and Wyers, P 1994 Parametri- zation of surfaceresistance for the quantification of atmospheric deposition of acidifying pollutants and ozone, Atmos. Environ, 28(16): 2595-2607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90433-2 · DOI
  12. Flanner, MG, Zender, CS, Hess, PG, Mahowald, NM, Painter, TH, Ramanathan, V and Rasch, PJ 2009 Springtime warming and reduced snow cover from carbonaceous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 9: 2481- 2497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009 · DOI
  13. Flanner, MG, Zender CS, Randerson, JT and Rasch, PJ 2007 Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow, J. Geophys. Res, 112(D11): 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gautier, DL, Bird, KJ, Charpentier, RR, Grantz, A, Houseknecht, DW, Klett, TR, Moore, TE, Pitman, JK, Schenk, CJ, Schuenemeyer, JH, Sorensen, K, Tennyson, ME, Valin, ZC and Wandrey, CJ 2009 Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Arctic, Science, 324: 1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169467 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Grell, GA and Devenyi, D 2002 A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett, 29(14): p. 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311 · DOI
  16. Grell, GA, Peckham, SE, Schmitz, R, McKeen, SA, Frost, G, Skamarock, WC and Eder, B 2005 Fully coupled 'online' chemistry in the WRF model. Atmos. Environ, 39: 6957-6976. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027 · DOI
  17. Hansen, J and Nazarenko, L 2004 Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 423-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2237157100 · DOI
  18. Hirdman, D, Sodemann, H, Eckhardt, S, Burkhart, JF, Jefferson, A, Mefford, T, Quinn, PK, Sharma, S, Ström, J and Stohl, A 2010 Source identification of short-lived air pollutants in the Arctic using statistical analysis of measurement data and particle dispersion model output, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 10: 669-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-10-669-2010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Iacono, MJ, Delamere, JS, Mlawer, EJ, Shephard, MW, Clough, SA and Collins, WD 2008 Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res, 113(D13): 103. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2008JD009944 · DOI
  20. Jacob, DJ, Crawford, JH, Maring, H, Clarke, AD, Dibb, JE, Emmons, LK, Ferrare, RA, Hostetler, CA, Russell, PB, Singh, HB, Thompson, AM, Shaw, GE, McCauley, E, Pederson, JR and Fisher, JA 2010 The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 10: 5191-5212. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5194/acp-10-5191-2010 · DOI
  21. Jiao, C, Flanner, MG, Balkanski, Y, Bauer, SE, Bellouin, N, Berntsen, TK, Bian, H, Carslaw, KS, Chin, M, De Luca, N, Diehl, T, Ghan, SJ, Iversen, T, Kirkevåg, A, Koch, D, Liu, X, Mann, GW, Penner, JE, Pitari, G, Schulz, M, Seland, Ø, Skeie, RB, Steenrod, SD, Stier, P, Takemura, T, Tsigaridis, K, van Noije, T, Yun, Y and Zhang, K 2014 An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 14: 2399-2417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-14-2399-2014 · DOI
  22. Kim, SW, Heckel, A, Frost, GJ, Richter, A, Gleason, J, Burrows, JP, McKeen, S, Hsie, EY, Granier, C and Trainer, M 2009 NO 2 columns in the western United States observed from space and simulated by a regional chemistry model and their implications for NO x emissions, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 114: D11301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011343 · DOI
  23. Kuenen, JJP, Visschedijk, AJH, Jozwicka, M and Denier van der Gon, HAC 2014 TNO-MACC_II emission inventory: a multi-year (2003-2009) consistent high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, 14: 5837-5869. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5194/acpd-14-5837-2014 · DOI
  24. Law, KS, Stohl, A, Quinn, PK, Brock, C, Burkhart, J, Paris, J-D, Ancellet, G, Singh, HB, Roiger, A, Schlager, H, Dibb, J, Jacob, DJ, Arnold, SR, Pelon, J and Thomas, JL 2014 Arctic Air Pollution: New Insights From POLARCAT-I PY, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-13-00017. · DOI
  25. Makkonen, R, Asmi, A, Korhonen, H, Kokkola, H, Järvenoja, S, Räisänen, P, Lehtinen, KEJ, Laaksonen, A, Kerminen, V-M, Järvinen, H, Lohmann, U, Bennartz, R, Feichter, J and Kulmala, M 2009 Sensitivity of aerosol concentrations and cloud properties to nucleation and secondary organic distribution in ECHAM5-HAM global circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 9: 1747-1766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1747-2009 · DOI
  26. Marelle, L, Thomas, JL, Raut, J-C, Law, KS, Jalkanen, J-P, Johansson, L, Roiger, A, Schlager, H, Kim, J, Reiter, A and Weinzierl, B 2016 Air quality and radiative impacts of Arctic shipping emissions in the summertime in northern Norway: from the local to the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16: 2359-2379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-16-2359-2016 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Middleton, P, Stockwell, WR and Carter, WP 1990 Aggregation and analysis of volatile organic compound emissions for regional modelling, Atmos. Environ, 24: 1107-1133. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90077-Z Morrison, H, Thompson, G and Tatarskii, V 2009 Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one-and two-moment scheme, Mon. Weather Rev, 137: 991-1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556. · DOI
  28. Nakanishi, M and Niino, H 2006 An improved Mellor- Yamada Level-3 Model: its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol, 119: 397-407. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8 · DOI
  29. Ødemark, K, Dalsøren, SB, Samset, BH, Berntsen, TK, Fuglestvedt, JS and Myhre, G 2012 Short-lived climate forcers from current shipping and petroleum activities in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 12: 1979-1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12- 1979-2012 · DOI
  30. Peters, GP, Nilssen, TB, Lindholt, L, Eide, MS, Glomsrød, S, Eide, LI and Fuglestvedt, JS 2011 Future emissions from shipping and petroleum activities in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 11: 5305-5320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-11-5305-2011 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pétron, G, Frost, G, Miller, BR, Hirsch, AI, Montzka, AE, Karion, A, Trainer, M, Sweeney, C, Andrews, AE, Miller, L, Kofler, J, Bar-Ilan, A, Dlugokencky, EJ, Patrik, L, Moore Jr, CT, Ryerson, TB, Siso, C, Kolodzey, W, Lang, PM, Conway, T, Novelli, P, Masarie, K, Hall, B, Guenther, D, Kitzis, DF, Miller, J, Welsh, D, Wolfe, D, Neff, W and Tans, P 2012 Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study, J. Geophys. Res, 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016360 · DOI
  32. Prank, M, Sofiev, M, Denier van der Gon, HAC, Kaasik, M, Ruuskanen, TM and Kukkonen, J 2010 A refinement of the emission data for Kola Peninsula based on inverse dispersion modelling. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 10: 10849-10865. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10849-2010 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Quinn, PK, Bates, TS, Baum, E, Doubleday, N, Fiore, AM, Flanner, M, Fridlind, A, Garrett, TJ, Koch, D, Menon, S, Shindell, D, Stohl, A and Warren, SG 2008 Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8: 1723-1735. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5194/acp-8-1723-2008 · DOI
  34. Roiger, A, Thomas, J-L, Schlager, H, Law, K, Kim, J, Schafler, A, Marelle, L, Raut, J-C, Weinzierl, B, Reiter, A, Rose, M, Dahlkotter, F, Minikin, A, Krisch, I, Scheibe, M, Stock, P, Baumann, R, Bouarar, I, Clerbeaux, C, George, M, Onishi, T and Flemming, J 2015 Quantifyng emerging local anthropogenic emissions in the Arctic region: the ACCESS aircraft campaign experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-13-00169. · DOI
  35. Serreze, MC and Barry, RC 2011 Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis, Global Planet. Change, 77: 85-96. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.03.004 · DOI
  36. Shindell, DT, Chin, M, Dentener, F, Doherty, RM, Faluvegi, G, Fiore, AM, Hess, P, Koch, DM, MacKenzie, IA, Sanderson, MG, Schultz, MG, Schulz, M, Stevenson, DS, Teich, H, Textor, C, Wild, O, Bergmann, DJ, Bey, I, Bian, H, Cuvelier, C, Duncan, BN, Folberth, G, Horowitz, LW, Jonson, J, Kaminski, JW, Marmer, E, Park, R, Pringle, KJ, Schroeder, S, Szopa, S, Takemura, T, Zeng, G, Keating, TJ and Zuber, A 2008 A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8: 5353-5372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-8-5353-2008 · DOI
  37. Stephenson, S, Smith, L and Agnew, J 2011 Divergent long-term trajectories of human access to the Arctic, Nature Climate Change, 1: 156-160. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1120. · DOI
  38. Stockwell, WR, Kirchner, F, Kuhn, M and Seefeld, S 1997 A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res, 102(D22): 25,847-25,879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00849. · DOI
  39. Tuccella, P, Curci, G, Visconti, G, Bessagnet, B, Menut, L and Park, RJ 2012 Modeling of gas and aerosol with WRF-Chem over Europe: Evaluation and sensitivity study, J. Geophys. Res, 117(D03): 303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016302. · DOI
  40. Walcek, CJ and Taylor, GR 1986 A theoretical method for computing vertical distribution of acidity and sulfate production within clouds, J. Atmos. Sci, 43: 339-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469 · DOI
  41. Wesely, ML and Hicks, BB 2000 A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition, Atmos. Environ, 34(12-14): 2261-2281. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00467-7 · DOI
  42. Wespes, C, Emmons, L, Edwards, DP, Hannigan, J, Hurtmans, D, Saunois, M, Coheur, P-F, Clerbaux, C, Coffey, MT, Batchelor, RL, Lindenmaier, R, Strong, K, Weinheimer, AJ, Nowak, JB, Ryerson, TB, Crounse, JD and Wennberg, PO 2012 Analysis of ozone and nitric acid in spring and summer Arctic pollution using aircraft, ground-based, satellite observations and MOZART-4 model: source attribution and partitioning, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 12: 237-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-237-2012 · DOI
  43. Wild, O, Zhu, X and Prather, MJ 2000 Fast-J: Accurate simulation of in-and below cloud photolysis in tropospheric chemical models, J. Atmos. Chem, 37: 245-282. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1006415919030 · DOI
  44. Xiao, Y, Logan, JA, Jacob, DJ, Hudman, RC, Yantosca, R and Blake, DR 2008 Global budget of ethane and regional constraints on US sources, J. Geophys. Res, 113(D21): 306. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1029/2007JD009415 · DOI
  45. Yang, Q, Bitz, CM and Doherty, SJ 2014 Offsetting effects of aerosols on Arctic and global climate in the late 20th century, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 14: 3969-3975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-14-3969-2014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuccella, P., Thomas, J. L., Law, K. S., Raut, J.-C., Marelle, L., Roiger, A., Weinzierl, B., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Schlager, H., & Onishi, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • TNO Climate, Air and Sustainability, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht, NL
ORCID
Venue
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Publisher
University of California Press
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
5
Pages
25
ISSN
2325-1026 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1525/elementa.124
OpenAlex
W2624155345
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (265863)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Keywords
offshore oil and gas platforms, Arctic air pollution, Norwegian Sea, emission inventory uncertainty, NOx emissions, NMVOC emissions, ozone enhancement, black carbon, chemical transport modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review